1 / 11

Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635. Eyal Neistein TMoX group, MPE Garching Collaborators: Sadegh Khochfar , Claudio Dalla-Vecchia , Joop Schaye. Hydrodynamic simulations (HYDs). Typical questions:.

robin-mitchell
Download Presentation

Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coinarXiv:1109.4635 EyalNeistein TMoX group, MPE Garching Collaborators: SadeghKhochfar, Claudio Dalla-Vecchia, JoopSchaye

  2. Hydrodynamic simulations (HYDs) Typical questions: • How each process affects the galaxy mass? (feedback, SF, Cooling) • Why changing the parameters of a given process (e.g. SF) do not affect the galaxies? What is `self-regulation’? • What is the physics missing in order to reproduce the observational results (e.g. the LF)? • Can we extrapolate the results of one zoom simulation into a large volume easily? • Can we easily quantify the differences between different codes/parameters? We need a tool to post-process a HYD !

  3. Semi-analytic models (SAMs) Can we use a SAM in order to interpret HYDs? • What is a SAM? • Each galaxy is described by only 3 numbers • Use the same underlying DM merger trees as in the HYD fs – star formation fc – cooling; fd – feedback fa - accretion Is this description accurate? Unique? Do we need only hot & cold gas? Is it the right tool ??

  4. Project outline HYD 1. We take a HYD that was run over a cosmological box (OWLS, Schaye+10) 2. We extract the rates of: accretion, cooling, feedback, and SF directly from the HYD 3. We save these rates as function of halo mass and redshift only 4. We run our SAM using the above recipes over the merger trees that are extracted from the HYD Recipes: fs, fc, fd, fa Dark matter merger trees SAM

  5. The history of one galaxy We follow all the particles, and check which got heated/cooled/SF/accreted fs – star formation fc – cooling; fd – feedback fa - accretion

  6. How similar are the galaxies? Galaxies are compared on an object-by-object basis: The HYD & SAM are similar at a level of ~0.1 dex

  7. Star-formation rates The SFR includes more scatter than integrated properties (like stellar mass)

  8. Efficiency values The HYD physics is different from typical SAMs

  9. One-phase model Assume that each galaxy is composed from ‘gas’ and ‘stars’ only: Works well!! Bouche +(2010), Krumholz & Dekel (2011); Khochfar & Silk (2011); Dave+ (2011)

  10. SAM based on only one galaxy? We chose 3 random galaxies from the box ( ) The SAM recipes are extracted from one galaxy only The SAM runs over the entire volume Works well!!

  11. Summary • HYD and SAM agreequite well, once efficiencies are matched on average • The SAM can be very simple, even one phase model is enough • All the recipes are summarized as a function of the host halo mass and redshift • The evolution of one galaxyincludes enough information to extract the baryonic behavior • We have a common language for both SAMs & HYDs Happy birthday Avishai !

More Related