280 likes | 296 Views
john a. powell Executive Director Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race & Ethnicity, Ohio State University http://www.kirwaninstitute.org. Roger Clay Jr. President National Economic Development & Law Center http://www.nedlc.org. Minority Business Development in Cleveland.
E N D
john a. powell Executive Director Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race & Ethnicity, Ohio State University http://www.kirwaninstitute.org Roger Clay Jr. President National Economic Development & Law Center http://www.nedlc.org Minority Business Developmentin Cleveland Prepared for the Cleveland Foundation August 29, 2005
Purpose of this Study • Identify strategies for The Cleveland Foundation to improve its minority business development approach
Methodology • Analysis of national MBE trends • Identify best practices • Analysis of minority businesses in Cleveland & Cuyahoga County • Interviews with stakeholders
Presentation Overview • MBE development matters • Economic and geographic analysis • What is and what isn’t working in Cleveland? • Community leader perceptions • Best Practices among Intermediaries • Emerging Opportunities • Conclusion
Why Does MBE Development Matter? • MBEs will become an increasingly important factor in local, regional and national economies • Minority businesses tend to hire non-white employees at a higher rate than do majority businesses
National MBE Trends • The number of minority owned businesses is growing faster than the rate for all U.S. firms • 17% of all companies in the U.S. were owned by minorities in 2002
1997-2002 – Sales up nationally for African-American- and Hispanic-owned businesses, but down in Ohio
Description of Cleveland’s MBEs • Sales and receipts of African American-owned businesses grew by 284% from 1992-1997. • Larger MBE's are doing relatively well compared to other metropolitan regions • Most Hispanic or Latino MBEs are non-certified and disengaged from the regional economy
Firm Expansion Rate Number of Employees Number of Years Average Credit Rating
Size by Industry • LARGE: • Wholesale Trade • Manufacturing • SMALL-to-MID-sized: • Retail Trade • Financial Services • Construction • Micro OR SMALL-to-MID-sized: • Professional Services • Growth: Financial Services were the only sector where the proportion of MBEs over $2.5 million in sales grew from 2000 to 2004
Geographic Distribution • Our analysis looked at the geographic location of MBE’s and how they were located in respect to other regional trends
What is Working in Cleveland? • Targeted technical assistance, business networking, mentoring, and supplier diversification efforts • Mainstream lending institutions compete for MBE lending • Cleveland has best practice community development financial institutions and community development venture capital funds • Good support from universities and colleges
What is not working? • Exclusivity • Competition • Informal business networking • Need for more accountability and measurable outcomes • Need for programs to monitor and take advantage of public procurement programs
Community Leader Perceptions • Structural challenges to MBE development • Limited social capital • Racism and weak political environment • Economics • Public education • Institutional based challenges • Difficulty in accessing capital • Need for more cooperation and specialization • Individual based challenges • Limited skill sets; talent; and strategic vision • Tendency toward life-style businesses
Best Practice for foundations funding MBE development – a comprehensive approach • Targeted Business Development Assistance • Well-planned Business Networking • Research, Advocacy & Public Policy formulation • Community development financing • Promotion of regional climate to support MBEs
Emerging Opportunities • Strategic partnerships • National trend toward supplier diversity • Strong and emerging sectors locally • New public sector affirmative procurement programs – especially Cuyahoga County
More Emerging Opportunities • Ohio’s new Minority Business Venture Capital Tax Credit Program • Large land bank of the City of Cleveland • New workforce development strategies • Local market gaps for small-businesses • Retail and Services in the growing Latino community
Recommendations • The Foundation should serve as a funder and convener of intermediaries working to promote and develop MBE • Support for MBE intermediaries serving various parts of Cuyahoga County, in addition to Cleveland • Provide multi-year grants
Recommendations • Fund intermediaries that: • Articulate measurable goals and outcomes • Coordinate and cooperate with other intermediaries funded by the Foundation • Partner with diverse stakeholders to support minority businesses • Develop a tracking system to monitor the health of minority businesses
Recommendation • Support the following: • A clearinghouse intermediary • Technical assistance and professional development grants to intermediaries • Research and evaluation to support the continued refinement of MBE services • Public policy formulation and advocacy
Recommendations • Support for multi-organizational and regional strategies that target specific industry sectors • Support for micro-enterprise and small-business development strategies that target industries with the most potential to grow to the next level
Conclusion • The Cleveland Foundation has a strategic opportunity to take its MBE promotion and development to the next level, with the combination of the intermediaries in place and many exciting, emerging opportunities.