1 / 32

Structuralism

Introduction & Theoretical Applications. Structuralism. Ferdinand de Saussure. 1857-1913 Linguist Granddaddy of semiotics French dude moustache pioneer. 1. Meaning occurs through difference.

robynw
Download Presentation

Structuralism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction & Theoretical Applications Structuralism

  2. Ferdinand de Saussure • 1857-1913 • Linguist • Granddaddy of semiotics • French dude • moustachepioneer

  3. 1. Meaning occurs through difference • “Concepts are purely differential and defined…by their relations with other terms of a system… In language there are only differences.” – Saussure • The meaning we give to signs is always relative: • Woman = NOT • Lady = NOT just or = NOT a gentleman man woman

  4. cave hovel tenement hut Tommy lives in a house. penthouse mansion palace coffin

  5. 3. Binary oppositions • Binary oppositions (pairs of opposites) are particularly common ways we structure the world: • Some theorists (like Claude Levi-Strauss) even suggested that all human thought is structured by binary oppositions… • up/down • good/evil • just/unjust • friend/enemy • nature/nurture • civilized/primitive • life/death • win/lose

  6. Binary Oppositions are everywhere… black / white body / soul pure / corrupted father / son male / female speech / writing sex / gender master / slave Mac / PC truth / fiction philosophy / myth sciences / humanities classical / romantic modern / postmodern poet / critic center / margins normal / deviant natural / unnatural straight / gay self / other high culture / pop culture base / superstructure waking / dreaming the library / the web

  7. 2. Some signs are based on contiguity • Some signs are related somehow to what they signify: • Onomatopoeia: 쨍그랑, crash, boom, tick-tock • Or depend on their relation to other signs: • “The White House announced yesterday…” • “run the gamut” (not walk the gamut) • But even signs with some connection to reality are arbitrary as soon as we express them: Why write 쨍and not jjaengorЖ◊Ω?

  8. 2. Most signs gain meaning by substitution • “The bond between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary,” not “motivated” (by natural resemblance). – Saussure • The meaning of signs is arbitrary • Why do ㄷand Drepresent similar sounds? • Does that sound actually have any ㄷness? D-ness? • Does a have any treeness?

  9. Signifier & Signified

  10. Signs are arbitrary; many signifiers are possible for one signified

  11. Signifiers are ambiguous & polysemic; one signifier can be associated with many things

  12. Signs don’t depend on physical reality “We feel the 8:25 p.m. Geneva-to-Paris Express to be the same train each day, though the locomotive, coaches, and personnel may be different. This is because the 8:25 train is not a substance but a form, defined by its relations to other trains. It remains the 8:25 even though it leaves twenty minutes late, so long as its difference from the 7:25 and the 9:25 is preserved. Although we may be unable to conceive of the train except in its physical manifestations, its identity as a social and psychological fact is independent of those manifestations.” – Saussure

  13. Signs power Obama • All language is signs—all words & letters are signs • Pictures can be signs (“iconic signs”) • ANYTHING can be a sign! • Signs have no inherent meaning; it can shift: • skinny jeans = cool  skinny jeans = stupid • (Remember: cool and stupid only make sense to us because of the usage context & their relation to other signs we know) • Many signs can be mythic: communicating large, often vague cultural meanings patriotism democracy hope greed Bourgeouis imperial capitalism

  14. Signs & Culture • Signs are a product of culture • Meaning is assigned based on context & cultural codes • So the study of texts is actually a study of: • relations between signs • the cultural construction of meaning • Structuralism is the “study of cultural construction or identification of meaning according to the relations of signs that constitute the meaning-spectrum of the culture.” – GérardGenette

  15. Gesture as Sign: Neo’s Finger

  16. Why is it different from this finger?

  17. Anything can be a sign! Do we make signs by mass agreement? By our intuition? By conventions established by those with greater power and influence?

  18. Signs get meaning from culture and difference (relations with other signs) =

  19. ∴ signs construct our reality! • The Iin “I am” is meaningless except as it relates to other signs. • All of those signs are defined by culture • Our sense of who we are is determined by culture • Even our specific desires are determined by culture

  20. I’m hungry… pizza noodles I want to eat kimchi. tacos graham crackers boiled beets

  21. Reality • Your unconscious isn’t your unconscious—it is just culture (and sub-culture) you’ve internalized • Thus, you are defined and constructed by culture • Reality is constructed by language & by culture: • That cross shape – God? Sign of the Infidels? • That raw fish – Something desirable? Something to be avoided? • That skinny girl – Beautiful? Sick-looking?

  22. So Far… • We experience reality based on signs • Signs have no meaning by themselves—no neutral, absolute, or objective meaning • Signs gain meaning in: • the context of a culture • relation to other signs (often binary oppositions) • Our sense of ourselves is also based on signs • If everything is made up of signs (books, words, ourselves, reality)… • …everything can be viewed as a text!!

  23. So what…? • We are surrounded by signs and don’t realize it • We don’t realize how arbitrary our sign systems are • We don’t realize that our sign systems define our reality • We don’t realize that our signs may encode and imprint on us power relations that may be problematic

  24. If everything is a text… • “Literature” is no longer just a bunch of special, privileged works… • But literary methods can now be used to understand everything! • Examples: • Human lives as narratives with shifting, absurd, undetermined meanings • Religious beliefs and rituals as symbol systems that construct concepts of self

  25. Structuralism Applied to Lit • Reality/normality and fantasy/absurdity/abnormality are all defined by cultural codes: Donald told Jenna he loved her. She glared, slapped him, then kissed him on the mouth, a long kiss that caught the attention of everyone in the church. • Structuralist reading: “There is a juxtaposition of cultural codes: a slap and glare, which in our culture tend signify hostility, and a kiss, which tends to signify affection.”

  26. How does the text relate to culture? • In our culture, what are the dominant conventions/codes of behavior that define activity in a church? • Does the text subvert/deviate from or follow those cultural codes? • How does that subversion relate to the other elements in the text—the kiss and the slap? • How do these elements together (cultural codes & textual elements) function to create possible meaning?

  27. Genre is another code • Cultural codes establish expectations in a text • Genre codes likewise establish expectations • Texts may be generic or may subvert expectations: There once was a man from Nantucket who ate all his meals from a bucket when asked ‘bout his style, he replied with a smile, “No more damn limericks. Alcoholism is no joke.”

  28. How can we use this stuff? • To explain how a dominant meaning is created from the elements of a text • To explore the relationships among elements within a text • To explore the relationships between textual elements and expectations created by genre and by culture (or sub-culture) • To find possible polysemy (arising from ambiguity) in the text and in all the elements within

  29. Exercise: Structuralist Reading of a Diet Coke Ad Areas to Focus on: • Cultural expectations as related to: • Gestures • Color codes • Technical codes • Music codes: genre, signification in lyrics • Intertextual readings (other ads) • Paradigmatic analysis • More…?

  30. extras • "Structuralism and Literary Criticism“ • http://www.brocku.ca/english/courses/4F70/genette.php • Semiotics for Beginners • http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/semind.html • Notes on Saussure • http://group249.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-do-you-like-them-apples.html

  31. Stuart Hall Stuart Hall • 1932-

  32. Stuart Hall: Encoding/Decoding • A message is encoded with one meaning but may be decoded as another. • Based on Gramsci’s theory of Hegemony. • The reading of a text may be read (decoded) in three different ways: dominant, negotiated, and oppositional.

More Related