70 likes | 173 Views
Theme 1: GNC’s role in relation to country clusters Issue C: GNC’s role in providing technical/ programming guidelines. Recommended option for providing technical guidance where gaps exist. Caution with word “harmonizing” – can GCN do it? Collating? Extracting relevant info?
E N D
Theme 1: GNC’s role in relation to country clustersIssue C: GNC’s role in providing technical/ programming guidelines
Recommended option for providing technical guidance where gaps exist • Caution with word “harmonizing” – can GCN do it? Collating? Extracting relevant info? • Need to clarify mechanism for making sure demands /gaps from countries are identified and fed to GNC and its members • Keep all options open, see what can work in a given situation, BUT: • Prefer options a) strategic partnership & b) outsourcing • Option d) avoid if possible because heavier commitment for GNC • Option c) UNICEF as provider as last resort? Last option - Mixed feelings
Implications for partners & the GNC-CT in providing tech guidance/guidelines • Options a) Strategic Partnership and b) outsource: Need transparency in choice of partner and terms of partnership / sharing of responsibilities, and how decisions are made . • Non bureaucratic mechanism for decision-making • Need to draw upon existing expertise / capacity of members to a maximum – encourage partner involvement + partner responsibility to be involved • Option d) Task force only if necessary because heavy • Option c) Need to see if feasible (need to see UNICEF appetite / ability to be involved in this kind of “last resort”)
Next steps to ensure relevant tech guidance is available for NCCs Need to define a clear process – Proposition: • GNC (secretariat and members) to identify and communicate needs • GCN secretariat to communicate with members to see if anybody can respond to the identified need (either with existing materials / capacity or in pipeline) • If not possible, GNC / partners can fund raise • Options for filling gap to be defined (a, b, d) with clear TOR / mechanisms / outputs / timelines by GCN secretariat or lead partner for clearance by SAG then clearance by GNC CT
Feedback from country level • Coordinator needs technical background to do the work to coordinate + represent nutrition in inter-cluster group • Who is best able to pinpoint technical guidance need: GNC or NCC? What is mechanism of communication need clear process for communicating needs to GNC (currently more ad hoc) and establishing priorities • Where are strategic priorities? – sometimes considered secondary? • Recap on background: GNC has spent a lot of time and resources on developing technical materials - HTP, MAM task force
(Susan) Example of partnership: Susn seconded by Save UK to Sphere funded by UNICEF to contribute to Sphere process – good experience because clearly defined process. Formed a group from beginning, outlined expected outputs and timeline • Example of potential collaboration with IPC for assessment? • Question of capacity of GCN secretariat to manage? • Which of 4 options – for each, there is a process • Option 3 – fair ? Possible? Biasness and time taken? • Identifying gaps ; then developing guidelines or harmonizing what role GCN? Identifying gap? Developing? Harmonizing? Then liaising with others to do it…