1 / 25

Evolution of Life Histories

Evolution of Life Histories . Life Histories. Concerned with 1. Size at reproductive maturity 2. Age at reproductive maturity 3. Number of offspring produced 4. Size of offspring produced Variation from two sources: 1. Epigenetic factors Phenotypic plasticity 2. Adaptations

roch
Download Presentation

Evolution of Life Histories

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evolution of Life Histories

  2. Life Histories • Concerned with • 1. Size at reproductive maturity • 2. Age at reproductive maturity • 3. Number of offspring produced • 4. Size of offspring produced • Variation from two sources: • 1. Epigenetic factors • Phenotypic plasticity • 2. Adaptations • Set by genotypes

  3. Conceptual Problems • 1. Life history characteristics have low heritability. • Relationship between life history characteristics and fitness • But, fitness usually has a large, variable, environmental component. • Genetic variation for life history characteristics is maintained by shifting selection pressures. • 2. Principles summarizing the diversity of life history strategies are rare.

  4. Life histories and reproductive mode • Two principles: • 1. Small genetic component in life history variation. • Flexibility is important • 2. Life history characteristics have not evolved in order to perpetuate a species. • Shaped by natural selection increasing fitness of individuals.

  5. Energy allocation principle • Energy available to an individual is finite • A constraint on r (per capita rate of increase) • Energy shunts: • 1. maintenance • 2. growth • 3. reproduction • Energy constraints on reproduction results in two fundamental strategies: • 1. Large number of small young • 2. Small number of large young

  6. New Zealand LS: 20 years Huge reproductive investment in a few individuals • LH strategy example:Kiwis Chicken-size 6 lbs Proportionately largest eggs of any bird (1 lb) Incubation by male (c. 11 wks.) Loses 20% BW Chicks not fed by adult Self reliant

  7. LS: 4 days • LH example: Thrip egg mites

  8. Life History Principles • Generally begin with birds • Reproductive output is accessible. • Reproductive output can be easily manipulated and adjusted. • Individuals can be marked for identification.

  9. The evolution of clutch size • Optimal clutch size • ? How much energy should an individual allocate to an episode of reproduction; e.g., how many eggs? • Trade-off: The more offspring produced, the fewer resources available for each individual. • Lack’s prediction: Selection should favor a clutch size that maximizes the number of surviving offspring. • Clutch size should be a reproductive strategy.

  10. Starting hypotheses Assumptions: 1. eggs are all the same size 2. current reproductive effort does not affect subsequent performance Tradeoff: Probability of individual survival < with > clutch size Prediction: Number of surviving offspring = clutch size x probability of individual survival Optimal clutch size = 5

  11. Number of Clutches N = 4489 Mean clutch size = 8.5 A test of the prediction: 1960-1982 Number surviving as a function of clutch size Parental lifetime fitness can decrease from care necessitated by large broods.

  12. Future effects of clutch size on daughters’ performance Collared Flycatchers

  13. Effect of age at first reproduction on size of subsequent clutches • e.g. Collared Flycatchers Begin at different ages Begin with extra eggs

  14. How large should offspring be? • Trade-off between number and size of offspring. • Produce many small OR few large? • The determining factor can be based on the size of the individuals produced; a size with adaptive value.

  15. A fitness enigma • Aspidoscelis tesselata (2n) • SVL = 92.1 mm • Clutch size = 3.9 eggs • neotesselata (3n) • SVL = 84.8 mm • Clutch size = 2.6 eggs • sexlineata (2n) • SVL = 67.6 mmk • Clutch size = 2.8 eggs

  16. Taylor, H. L., B. A. Droll, and J. M. Walker. 2006. Proximate causes of a phylogenetic constraint on clutch size in parthenogenetic Aspidoscelis neotesselata (Squamata: Teiidae) and range expansion opportunities provided by hybridity. Journal of Herpetology 40:294-304.

  17. Intraspecific divergence in life histories in A. tesselata (a parthenogenetic species)

  18. Fort Sumner

  19. Aspidoscelis tesselata Pattern class E Pattern class C

  20. Taylor, H. L., J. M. Walker, J. E. Cordes, and G. J. Manning. 2005. Application of the evolutionary species concept to parthenogenetic entities: comparison of postformational divergence in two clones of Aspidoscelis tesselata and between Aspidoscelis cozumela and Aspidoscelis maslini (Squamata: Teiidae). Journal of Herpetology 39:266-277.

More Related