280 likes | 395 Views
Slides available online at http://loki.stockton.edu/intech/aug25.pdf. Concepts and Practical Tools for Online Courses. Linda Feeney, Ed.D . Director Computer Services. R ita Mulholland, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Teacher Education. Before We Start….
E N D
Slides available online at http://loki.stockton.edu/intech/aug25.pdf Concepts and Practical Tools for Online Courses Linda Feeney, Ed.D. Director Computer Services Rita Mulholland, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Teacher Education
Before We Start… • First a brief poll so you can tell us about your experience with online meeting environments
Overview • Introduction to Wimba Live Classroom features • Exploring the possibilities of the Blackboard CE6 Discussion Tool • Using Wimba Live Classroom for Discussion • Managing group projects • Using Wimba Live Classroom in group projects • Applying Bloom’s Taxonomy to Assignments , Assessments, Goals, and Grading Forms • Consolidating the learning experience with ePortfolios • Incorporating publishers’ e-pack content
Wimba ClassroomParticipant Screen Areas Content Frame Media Bar Text Chat Area Participant Area
Wimba ClassroomPresenter Screen Presenter Panel
Checking in Again… • Another quick poll. Tell us about the tools that you use in your instruction
DiscussionCommunity Building • Ice Breaker – open-ended • Introduction • Content Preview • Personal experience with topic (level setting) • Keep in Touch • Who am I? (20 questions to identify fellow students) • Housekeeping/Support • How do I? Where is? Etc.
DiscussionQuick Check • Integrated – Online Survey Widget – Vizu.com for opinion overview.
DiscussionGeneral Roles • Initiator – proposes topic(s) for discussion • Facilitator – middle man, invites contributions, mediates disagreements • Contributor – adds relevant commentary • Lurker – reads discussion but does not participate • N/A in instructional setting • Elicitor -- asks questions, seeks additional information or clarification • Acknowledger – “Me, too” agreement with discussion • Complicator – Reframes discussion, may pull discussion off track • Closer – summarizes and synthesizes discussion, draws conclusions
Using Discussion Rolesin Instruction • Assign specific roles to individual students or groups of students • Use roles for evaluation • Grading Form (i.e., rubric) • Peer Evaluation • Self Evaluation • Faculty generally take on the roles of initiator and facilitator – be sure to perform or assign summary function
DiscussionDebate • Choose an issue (e.g., government administered health care) assign students to three groups – for, against, judge • Debaters back up responses by referring to text or additional resources • Judges evaluate debaters’ responses to scenario, justifying with references to text or additional resources
DiscussionRole Playing • Based on narrative text, auto/biography, historical or current event • Assign “characters” to individual students • Assign evaluator role to student(s) • Pose questions or scenario to the actors • Actors back up responses by referring to text or additional resources • Evaluators judge actors response to scenario, justifying with references to text or additional resources • Example – Students are reading Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar; • Assign roles of Brutus, Cassius, Marc Antony, Portia, and Calpurnia, and evaluators • Pose questions like: How has your life changed since his death? Would your life have been better had he lived, why or why not? etc. Evaluators pose additional questions to actors
DiscussionSimulation • Choose a relevant scenario • Divide students into groups responsible for a variety of functions appropriate to the scenario • Instructor acts as outside force informing groups of various actions beyond their control that affect their virtual world • Example – Preparing for an Influenza Pandemic http://www.pandemicflu.gov/plan/states/tr319.html#gen
Group ProjectsManagement • Assign functional roles • Coordinator, Scribe, Manager, Illustrator, Editor • Other roles project specific (e.g., data analyst, interviewer) • Don’t assume students have teamwork skills • Emphasize process as important as product • Provide direction – input/feedback with each role as project progresses; require early submission of group project analysis and timeline • Alert student to pitfalls – conflict resolution, procrastination
Group Project PlanningMapping • Mind map – a diagram representing ideas, tasks, processes • Enhanced method of brainstorming -- generate, visualize, and organize ideas. • http://www.wisemapping.com • Free (for now, at least) • Collaborative • Export to multiple formats
Another Check… • Using the Yes () or No () button at the bottom of the Participant Area: Are you familiar with Bloom’s Taxonomy? • Using the Yes () or No () button at the bottom of the Participant Area: Do you use Bloom’s Taxonomy in planning your instructional activities, assignments, and assessments?
Bloom’s Taxonomy 1956 2001 Evaluation Create Synthesis Evaluate Noun Verb http://www.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/curric/newtaxonomy.htm
Learning Dynamics • Environment/ • Tools • Interaction • Process/ • Style • Evidence/Artifacts
Learning Evidence/Artifacts • Test/quiz scores • Verbal Literacy (e.g., case study, lab report, essay, research paper, discussion postings, debate) • Quantitative Literacy (e.g., spreadsheets, calculations, projections, statistical analysis) • Visual Literacy (e.g., graphs, tables, maps, charts, photographs, illustrations, movies, animations) • Interpersonal Skills (e.g., group projects, discussion postings, video of presentation) • Share artifacts with others using ePortfolio
ePortfolio Rubric • Organization • Topical or Chronological • Related to Goals • Representative • Illustrates full scope of expertise • Varied artifacts – • Demonstrate verbal, quantitative, visual, and interpersonal skills • Demonstrate higher level cognitive achievement – application, analysis, synthesis, evaluation (Bloom’s Taxonomy) • Reflections on artifacts included in portfolio • Selective • Enough, but not too much content • Best work
ePortfolio Reflections • Who I am? • Qualities, experiences (successes and failures), and characteristics that shape my professional interests • What do I believe? • How I see and relate to the world and my profession • How I see my profession’s function in the world • What I see for the future of my profession • How do I practice (or intend to practice) my profession? • How do my artifacts relate to these factors?
PublisherePack Content • Many publishers generate online content that duplicates and/or supplements textbooks. • Free to faculty, students pay for access code (cost varies by complexity of content) • Always review thoroughly before use • Request development section for testing/modification at http://compserv.stockton.edu • http://www.blackboard.com/Support/Extensions.aspx Click on e-Packs
Wrap Up • Archive • Follow up session – August 31 • Questions?
Resources Survey Widget • http://www.vizu.com/index.html Mind Mapping • http://wisemapping.com/c/home.htm • http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Download Bloom’s Taxonomy • http://www.teachers.ash.org.au/researchskills/dalton.htm • http://www.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/curric/newtaxonomy.htm • http://www.scribd.com/doc/933640/Bloom-Revised Textbook e-Packs • http://www.blackboard.com/Support/Extensions.aspx Group Project Management • http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/teach/instructionalstrategies/groupprojects/structuring.html