370 likes | 558 Views
Electronic stopping power of ions in insulator as calculated by TD-DFT. Emilio Artacho. Department of Earth Sciences University of Cambridge. Miguel Pruneda Physics, UC Berkeley. Collaborators . Donostia International Physics Centre Daniel Sanchez-Portal (implementation) Andres Arnau
E N D
Electronic stopping power of ions in insulator as calculated by TD-DFT Emilio Artacho Department of Earth Sciences University of Cambridge
Miguel Pruneda Physics, UC Berkeley Collaborators Donostia International Physics Centre Daniel Sanchez-Portal (implementation) Andres Arnau Inaki Juaristi Pedro Echenique & Discussions with Txema Pitarke & Thanks to Peter Bauer(Linz, Austria) Thanks to the Miller Institute at UCB
Immobilisation of nuclear waste by dilution in ceramics SYNtheticROCkswith appropriate “minerals” to host high level nuclear waste Research in durability: We need them to last for ~ 1My Resistance to radiation damage Zircons have contained uranium for billions of years
Durability: Radiation damage α-particle ~ 5 MeV α-decay process • It causes: • Amorphisation • (metamict) • Swelling • Cracks • Leaching Recoil ~ 100 keV Zircon: model study: old natural samples
Recoil damage: amorphisation zircon K. Trachenko & M. T. Dove, with empirical potentials
Electrons heat up: effect on the material? Effect on the simulations? The ion moving in the solid transmits energy to electrons. How much? How? Where? What consequences does it have? Coupled dynamics of both electrons & nuclei (realistic simulation demands ~ 2M atoms)
Multiscale: Different timescales • this study (electronic excitation) • electron-phonon coupling + • heat conductivities for the electron • and phonon subsystems • Continuum description of excess energy • Eel ( r,t) First: how much energy is it pumped to the electrons per unit time
High v: Bethe Low (and intermediate) v: Fine underst. Metals, P.T. Energy transfered to electrons: Measured by electronic stopping power dE/dx (eV/Ang) v (atomic units) 100 keV Recoiling Th nucleus: v = 0.1 a.u.
Electronic versus nuclear stopping Metals: S ~ v for v -> 0 Nuclear stopping dominates at low velocities
Stopping in noble gases Scattering cross section of H+ on He and Ne Experiments: JT Park & EJ Zimmerman, Phys. Rev.131, 1611 (1963) A Schiefermuller et al. Phys. Rev. A48, 4467 (1993) Calculations:R Cabrera-Trujillo et al., PRL 84, 5300 (2000) Nuclear stopping
Electronic stopping in insulators: different? C Auth et a. PRL 81, 4831 (1998) Protons onto LiF: (5 keV ~ v = 1 a.u.) Grazing angle (on the surface) Threshold
Electronic stopping power in LiF Across thin films H V = 0.4 a.u. dE/dx = 0.12 a.u. = 6.2 eV/Ang (But 1.6 error) = 3.9 eV/Ang Juaristi et al, PRL 84, 2124 (2000) No threshold
Protons and antiprotons into LiF thin films “Antiproton Stopping at Low Energies: Confirmation of Velocity-Proportional Stopping Power” SP Møller et al. PRL 88, 193201 (2002) & PRL 93, 042512 (2004) No threshold
Protons into LiF thin films again M. Draxler et al, PRL95,113201 (2005) Scale: v = 0.1 a.u. => Stopping ~ 1 eV/Ang Threshold
Strict threshold: 1/2 (me +mh)vc2 = Egap Threshold: what to expect? TD Pertub. Th. (weak projectile potential) e-h excitations such that / k = v Exc: V(q=k)
TD-DFT: Our approach • Supercell of insulator’s bulk • Periodic boundary conditions • Density functional theory • Add external charge (potential) • Move it and follow electron wave-functions with Time-Dependent DFT
The SIESTA method Linear-scaling DFT based on NAOs (Numerical Atomic Orbitals) P. Ordejon, E. Artacho & J. M. Soler , Phys. Rev. B 53, R10441 (1996) • Born-Oppenheimer (relaxations, mol. dynamics) • DFT (LDA, GGA) • Pseudopotentials (norm conserving, factorised) • Numerical atomic orbitals as basis (finite range) • Numerical evaluation of matrix elements (3D grid) Implemented in the SIESTA program J. M. Soler, E. Artacho, J. D. Gale, A. Garcia, J. Junquera, P. Ordejon & D. Sanchez-Portal, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter14, 2745 (2002)
Time dependent DFT Usual (stationary) DFT: Time-dependent DFT: Neither forces on atoms (no MD), nor moving basis
Real time evolution of the density • SIESTA (LCAO) • Evolution of the TD-KS equations: Crank-Nicholson
Energy as a function of distance: LiF Quite stationary!Short transient, no obvious oscillation
Rate of energy transfer: electronic stopping power Protons and antiprotons through LiF Threshold ~ 0.2 a.u. (exp ~ 0.1) Ratio SPp/SPa ~ 2.4 (exp ~ 2.1)
Rate of energy transfer: electronic stopping power Protons and antiprotons through LiF Threshold ~ 0.2 a.u. (exp ~ 0.1) Ratio SPp/SPa ~ 2.4 (exp ~ 2.1) Absolute value: improve basis; sp basis along trajectory (for p)
Rate of energy transfer: electronic stopping power Protons and antiprotons through LiF Threshold ~ 0.2 a.u. (exp ~ 0.1) Ratio SPp/SPa ~ 2.4 (exp ~ 2.1) Absolute value ~ 20-50% too small as compared to experiment But: Th is channelling, exp is average
Stopping power dependence on charge For small positive charges,the linear regime is recovered. dE/dx ~ q2 v (small perturbation)
Evolution of the charge on nearby Li atoms v = 1 au Nearest neighb. v = 0 2nd nearest neighb. Position of projectile along trajectory (x=0 closest to nearest Li) Screening of charge enhanced at finite v Extremely short-ranged mechanism
Locality in the electronic stopping power Protons in LiF Compare bulk with small cluster Li6F5+
Further Channeling vs average trajectories: Electronic stopping power in channels ~ average/2 JJ Dorado & F Flores, PRA 47, 3062 (1993) Combine nuclear & electron stopping Requires simultaneous dynamics. Hard technically and computationally (time scales) Charge states (momentum) Interesting. Right question to pose.
Summary • Using TD-DFT for obtaining the energy transfer from moving ions to electrons in insulators. • New approach, complementary • Offers new kinds of information • Lots to do! Important: Recoiling velocity around threshold
Atomic Energies“Hamiltonian Population” Mulliken Atomic/Overlap Population Hamiltonian Atomic/Overlap Population: a way of defining “local energy” in our problem LCAO simplest version of energy density – R.M. Martin PRB-(‘92)
Flat-band limit: Simple model Gaussian perturbation as V0
Dependence on basis set & other approx Dependence on technicalities (supercell size, numerical integrations, pseudos) But also on more fundamental aspects (Charge state, DFT kernel: instantaneous LDA)