1 / 18

Implementation progress – second stage

Implementation progress – second stage. Transmission Transparency Workshop London, 14 November 2008. Outline. Background Project scope Implementation by data type Successful TSOs Work still required Conclusions and feedback. Project background.

rodd
Download Presentation

Implementation progress – second stage

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementation progress – second stage Transmission Transparency Workshop London, 14 November 2008

  2. Outline • Background • Project scope • Implementation by data type • Successful TSOs • Work still required • Conclusions and feedback

  3. Project background • TSO agreement on release new data during 2008 • Focus on a priority subset of information • Three stages of implementation • Transparency key for market developments

  4. Project scope: non-confidential IPs

  5. Data types released where < 3 rule applied

  6. TSOs that report new information release

  7. October 2008: overview of progress

  8. Impact of delays

  9. Overall Implementation Progress

  10. December 2008 – Final Stage

  11. Late implementation - 2009 ?

  12. Conclusions and recommendations • Positive progress made to date • But significant work remains to be done • Some companies ahead of the game, others significantly delayed • Delays in key data: daily flows (F1) and day-ahead nominations (F3) • Knock-on effect of delays • 2009 overruns need to specific on dates • TSOs commitment is crucial for remaining data • Completion of the project is starting point for further work • Final implementation report to be published February 2009

  13. Your feedback matters All stakeholders • Accessibility and usefulness of the data • Quality and consistency of the data published • Are the definitions for each data type appropriate? • Improvements to project management and reporting • Any other key issues?

  14. Transparency project 2009 Transmission Transparency Workshop London, 14 November 2008

  15. Where is the discussion at? • Initial views on the need for a “phase 2” transparency project were discussed at workshop with stakeholders in July 2008 • A second phase should be based on real benefits for users and take into account additional costs for TSOs • Starting point should be full completion of “phase I” • The (potential) second phase should keep up with increased transparency requirements in 3rd package, as well as other GRI projects • User views have been presented on project priorities

  16. Consensus needs to be build solidly

  17. Our suggested approach Any future work to based on clear roles and responsibilities, sufficient resources, and commitment to timelines

More Related