60 likes | 260 Views
McCulloch Vs Maryland. Alek Henningsgard. Participants. Maryland James W. McCulloch Second bank of the United States. Problems. Maryland passed a law that would allow them to tax all out of state banks operating in Maryland. It was specifically targeted at Second Bank of the United states
E N D
McCulloch Vs Maryland Alek Henningsgard
Participants • Maryland • James W. McCulloch • Second bank of the United States
Problems • Maryland passed a law that would allow them to tax all out of state banks operating in Maryland. • It was specifically targeted at Second Bank of the United states • Only out of state bank • James W. McCulloch operator of the Baltimore branch refused to pay.
More Problems • Maryland believed the Bank was unconstitutional and should be shut down.
Outcome • The Supreme Court voted unanimously with the Bank. • Chief Justice John Marshall stated that “the constitution and the laws made in pursuance thereof are supreme . . . they control the constitution and laws of the respective states, and cannot be controlled by them.”
Significance • This case established the following principles: • The Constitution grants Congress implied powers to implement the Constitution's powers. • State action may not impede valid constitutional exercises of power by the Federal government.