200 likes | 1.02k Views
Clinical Application. Use: Is the goal stimulation of the peripheral nerve OR some other tissue?For NMES PN stim is the goal; best for mild to moderate contractions and areas not covered with excess adipose.For TENS - PN stim is the goal; portable HVPC devices do exist*Wound healing - chronic,
E N D
1. High Volt Pulsed Current (HVPC) Almost 60 yrs old, popular last 25 years with numerous uses.
Review of the waveform:
Twin-peak monophasic pulse
phase duration: 25?s, sometimes adjustable
comfortable but weak current; polarity present but electrochemical (net DC) effect not harmful. Typical stimulation time does not exceed 1 hour.
2. Clinical Application Use: Is the goal stimulation of the peripheral nerve OR some other tissue?
For NMES – PN stim is the goal; best for mild to moderate contractions and areas not covered with excess adipose.
For TENS - PN stim is the goal; portable HVPC devices do exist
*Wound healing - chronic, slow healing wounds
Acute edema formation – based in animal research
Iontophoresis - cutting edge; not widely supported
PN stim is NOT the goal on the last 3, but it still happens
3. Factors in using HVPC for NMES or TENS: Amplitude (based on desired excitatory response)
Pulse Rate (related to pain control theory or motor response needed)
Mode - Continuous, Ramp-Surge, Alternate
Placement of Electrodes:
nothing new
4. Wound Healing: E-stim for Tissue Repair (ESTR) Robert Becker – 1962
Theory - “Current of Injury”
normal bioelectric system, nonexcitable tissues have a charge
skin -----
deeper tissues +++++
neuraxis ++++++
periphery -------
Wounds - system is disturbed & creates a “current of injury” that initiates tissue healing . . . inflammatory process, migration of cells, etc..
Use of E-stim magnifies the “current of injury” to initiate, maintain, or speed the process.
5. “Current of Injury” cont... Further research established
Wound tissue is (+) & skin around is (-); this difference is the “skin battery” or “current of injury” and must exist for proper healing; if it fails or is disrupted, then slow/no healing can occur. E -stim can help restore the “skin battery”.
Further supported by evidence that many chronic wounds lost (+) polarity; e-stim w/ the anode (+) over the wound enhanced healing. (using DC)
If healing plateaued, switching polarity = good outcome
Kloth & Feedar, Phys Ther, April 88
6. Phys Ther 1988 methodfor e-stim of wounds Monophasic twin-pulse current (HVPC)
105 pps
Amplitude: submotor
Time - 45 min, 5 days a week
Wound packed with soaked gauze and anode (+) placed over wound
Cathode placed 15 cm away, proximal
Rationale: Done to amplify the “current of injury”
7. Contemporary Theory: Galvanotaxis A naturally occurring process whereby signaling/messenger systems work via bioelectrical mechanisms. (Does not contradict the chemical model of human physiology; “chemotaxis”).
8. Contemporary Theory: Galvanotaxis Process can be corrected and/or enhanced by attraction of cells to the wound thru use of anode (+) or cathode (-)
Leukocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial & epithelial cells, etc.. all have polarity and can be electrically attracted.
Treatment polarity depends on stage of the wound
READ THE ARTICLE: Kloth & McCulloch (1996)
9. Kloth Advances in Wound Care 1996 method Monophasic twin-pulse current (HVPC)
100 pps, no mention of pulse width
Amplitude - just below motor
Time - 60 min, 5 days a week
Wound packed with soaked gauze
Polarity - based on wound state
Other electrode placed 15 - 20 cm away (proximal) to complete the circuit
Done to amplify the “injury potential” or “current of injury” and produce “galvanotaxic attraction”
10. Electrode Placement Options
Directly over the wound
Directly in the wound *
Straddle the wound
More information FYI:
http://medicaledu.com/estim.htm
11. Some Hx of ESTR Why not use LIDC ??: Studies have shown it to be effective
Much longer Rx time and greater frequency of Rx
electrochemical changes more pronounced & potentially harmful (due to pH changes in tissue)
HVPC has a shorter Rx time and less frequent, no harmful electrochemical changes in the tissue
Mechanisms by which biphasic or AC may enhance healing are not well-understood.
12. ESTR Treatment Tid-bits ESTR usually not used on well-healing wounds, more for chronic wounds
DOES NOT replace typical wound care
Suggest physician cooperation/agreement
Patient tolerance or refusal a potential issue based on the way you describe it.
Suggest continuing education to become more competent.
13. Contraindications Osteomyelitis
Malignancies / neoplasms
Carotid sinus / laryngeal ms.
Thru the thorax
Demand-type pacemakers
Over topical agents containing metal ions (iodine, mercurochrome)
Others as previously learned; except for open tissue
15. Reimbursement IssuesCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Electrical stimulation for the treatment of wounds will only be covered for chronic Stage III or Stage IV pressure ulcers, arterial ulcers, diabetic ulcers and venous stasis ulcers.
All other uses of electrical stimulation for the treatment of wounds are non-covered.
Chronic ulcers are defined as ulcers that have not healed within 30 days of occurrence.
Electrical stimulation will not be covered as an initial treatment modality.
16. Reimbursement Issues . . . Electrical stimulation will be covered only after appropriate standard wound therapy has been tried for at least 30-days and there are no measurable signs of healing. This 30-day period can begin while the wound is acute.
Measurable signs of improved healing include a decrease in wound size, either surface area or volume, decrease in amount of exudates and decrease in amount of necrotic tissue. Standard wound care includes: optimization of nutritional status; debridement by any means to remove devitalized tissue; maintenance of a clean, moist bed of granulation tissue with appropriate moist dressings; and necessary treatment to resolve any infection that may be present.
17. Reimbursement Issues . . . Continued treatment with electrical stimulation is not covered if measurable signs of healing have not been demonstrated within any 30-day period of treatment.
Electrical stimulation must be discontinued when the wound demonstrates 100 per-cent epithelialzed wound bed.
This service can only be covered when performed by a physician, physical therapist, or incident to a physician service.
18. HVPC for Acute Edema control Based on the results from animal studies, HVPC may have an effect upon acute edema FORMATION but the effect is short-lived (several hours); therefore, treatment is recommended for 30 minutes every 4 hours for the period of time that bleeding/swelling is expected to occur. This treatment duration and frequency fits well with the RICE protocol but may often be too frequent for an individual needing/trying to function (work or school). A portable HVPC unit is essential (and available)
19. This treatment is indicated for acute trauma (sprain, strain, contusion) or post-surgery. The situation must be an ACUTE TRAUMATIC CONDITION where bleeding, swelling & inflammation are actively developing. The underlying physiological effect is largely unknown but studies often point toward an effect upon capillary permeability - related to histamine release.
20. ELECTROTHERAPY TREATMENT OF SWELLING I EDEMA