1 / 41

WS/FCS Polling Site Report

WS/FCS Polling Site Report . Sam Mills, Staff Attorney Dionne Jenkins, Staff Attorney April 15, 2014. WHAT WE WILL COVER . Overview Reporting Factors Conclusions and Recommendations Next Steps . Overview. Overview .

ronny
Download Presentation

WS/FCS Polling Site Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WS/FCS Polling Site Report Sam Mills, Staff Attorney Dionne Jenkins, Staff Attorney April 15, 2014

  2. WHAT WE WILL COVER • Overview • Reporting Factors • Conclusions and Recommendations • Next Steps

  3. Overview

  4. Overview • North Carolina General Statutes specifically delegate authority to local Board of Elections to provide for a suitable structure for voting. • Local Board of Elections shall be entitled to demand and use any school or other State, county, or municipal building which is supported or maintained through tax revenues. • It is the responsibility of those in control of the building to provide adequate parking.

  5. Overview • Of the 101 county precincts, 36 polling sites are located in WS/FCS public schools. • 22 elementary schools • In November 2013 municipal elections, approximately 7,000 people cast their votes at our public schools. • 32% of all votes cast

  6. overview • High voter turnout: • Glenn High School • Sedge Garden Elementary • Cash Elementary School • Lewisville Elementary School • Southwest Elementary School • East Forsyth High School • Jefferson Middle School • Meadowlark Middle School

  7. OVERVIEW • Staff Attorneys visited all 36 polling sites • Met with school administrators • Followed voter routes • Identified safety concerns • Identified alternative polling sites • Not concerned with Presidential Elections(school is closed) • Primaries and mid-term elections – Tuesday after first Monday in May and November

  8. Overview • This was a collaborative effort with the local Board of Elections. • Our “team” consisted of: • Staff Attorneys • Darrell Walker, Asst. Superintendent of Operations • Bill Powell, Construction Specialist • Patrick Merrill, Security • Lamar Joyner, Interim Director of Forsyth County Board of Elections

  9. Overview Staff Attorneys’ observations from the school visits are detailed in the confidential school summaries that have been provided to the Board of Education members. The individual school summaries are not being made a part of the public board book because the contain recommendations for inclusions to school improvement plans as well as contain detailed plans and drawings of public school buildings, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §115C-105.27 and 132-1.7(a).

  10. Poll site reporting factors

  11. REPORTING FACTORS • Level of Sequestration • Security Risks • Registered Sex Offenders • On-Campus Alternatives • Off-Campus Alternatives

  12. REPORTING FACTORS: Sequestration • Level of interaction between students and voters • Location of polling site in relation to student areas: • Classrooms • Student restrooms • Common areas • Concern: Potential for unsupervised direct contact between students and voters

  13. Reporting factors: Sequestration • At most schools, voting occurs in the gymnasium, media center, or auditorium. • For some schools, the polling site is located in the “heart” of the school. • For others, the polling site has separate entrance/exit which requires no contact with students. • Examples: • Not sequestered: Forest Park Elementary School • Sequestered: Lewisville Elementary School

  14. REPORTING FACTORS: Security Risks • We have never had an incident reported involving a student and voter on election day. • In the summaries, we identify ways to reduce potential liability by offering “best practices” on election days. • Most common security concerns: • Traffic/Parking Lot Safety • Improving Supervision

  15. Reporting factors: Security Risks • Traffic/Parking Lot Safety • At many schools, traffic is problematic on any given day, but especially in high turnout precincts on election day. • Not aware of any major incidents in the past

  16. Reporting factors: Security Risks • Traffic/Parking Lot Safety (cont’d) • Concerns: • Significant delays • Harder to control traffic flow • Students walking through parking lot • Elections officials walking through parking lot • This past November, an elections official was nearly struck by a vehicle at one of the elementary schools.

  17. Reporting factors: Security Risks • Improving Supervision • The most common concern among school administrators was the potential for voters to wander the halls and have direct, unsupervised contact with students. • We are not aware this has ever happened.

  18. Reporting factors: Security Risks • Improving Supervision (cont’d) • For schools where the voting is not sequestered, voters walk through the hallways past student areas to access the polling site. • Many schools do not have additional staff on-hand to escort voters to the polling site and, therefore, voters are left to walk the halls unsupervised.

  19. Reporting factors: Security Risks • Improving Supervision (cont’d) • Concerns: • Classrooms – In many of the schools, classrooms, at least on elementary school level, are locked from the outside. • Cafeteria – In many cases, voters walk past the cafeteria to access the polling site or, conversely, students walk past the polling site to access the cafeteria.

  20. Reporting factors: Security Risks • Improving Supervision (cont’d) • Concerns: • Hallways – Most elementary school children will be supervised in hallways by a teacher, but may be in hallways unsupervised at times (i.e. called to Principal’s office, using the restroom). Middle and high school students more likely to walk the hallway unsupervised. • Bathrooms – In some cases, student restrooms located directly across from polling site. However, restroom provisions are not required for polling sites.

  21. Reporting factors: Registered Sex Offenders • Each school report identifies the number of registered sex offenders within one and three miles of the school. • Current as of April 10, 2014

  22. Reporting factors: Registered Sex Offenders • Pursuant to NC General Statutes and AR 1500, registered sex offenders who are registered to vote may be on school property: • For the limited purpose of voting and are not allowed outside of the voting enclosure except for entering/exiting the voting place. • Must notify the Principal that they are a registered sex offender and are there for the purpose of voting.

  23. Reporting factors: Registered Sex Offenders • Each school Principal is required to subscribe to the NC Sex Offender Registry alert system, which generates an email whenever a registered sex offender moves within one mile of the school. • The School Attorney’s Office notifies the registered sex offender of their requirements under the law. • We are not aware of any incidents involving a student and a registered sex offender on election day.

  24. Reporting factors: On-campus Alternatives • Where possible, potential liability may be reduced by moving the polling site from the current location to another location on the school grounds. • Any alternative polling site must meet the State Board of Elections accessibility standards and have adequate facilities to accommodate voters.

  25. Reporting factors: On-campus Alternatives • Accessibility Standards: • Must be handicap accessible • Must have room to accommodate the number of voters • Must have adequate power access • Must be in vicinity of parking

  26. Reporting factors: On-campus Alternatives • In addition, our local Board of Elections prefers: • That it be located in vicinity of parking and entrance so that voters, especially the elderly and disabled, are not required to walk long distances • That curbside voting can be maintained

  27. Reporting factors: On-campus Alternatives • Examples of recommendations: • Piney Grove Elementary School – Move from gymnasium to media center • Brunson Elementary School – Move from gymnasium to external mobile unit • Whitaker Elementary School – Move from stage to media center • If there is no other suitable on-campus alternative, the School Attorney’s Office will work with school administration to make changes internally to reduce potential liability.

  28. Reporting factors: Off-campus Alternatives • It is unlikely that the Board of Elections will stop using schools as polling sites. • Schools are ADA-accessible, tend to be centrally-located in relation to the population they serve, and offer sufficient parking. • In some of the individual school summaries, we made suggestions for off-campus alternatives for your consideration. • In three instances, we did recommend moving the voting location from one school to another school within the same precinct.

  29. Conclusions & recommendations

  30. conclusions & recommendations • 1). Move polling sites from one school to another within the same precinct. • 2). Increase the number of volunteers at voting sites on election days. • 3). Develop “best practices” for all voting sites. • 4). Implement site-specific changes for voting sites. • 5). Develop a plan to reduce/eliminate liability in parking and high traffic areas.

  31. Conclusions & recommendations • Moving polling sites from one school to another within the same precinct. • Cash Elementary School to East Forsyth Middle School • Paisley Middle School to Cook Elementary School • Mineral Springs Elementary School to Mineral Springs Middle School In none of our summaries did we recommend moving voting from a school to a non-school facility.

  32. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS • Increase the number of volunteers at voting sites on election days. • Up to 2 additional volunteers, in addition to the poll workers provided by board of elections. • Volunteers should be recruited from parent organizations, school system staff, and members of the community. • Volunteers are important to help identify voters as they arrive, direct them to the polling site and designated restrooms, and supervise the area in/around the polling site.

  33. Conclusions & recommendations • Develop “best practices” for all voting sites. • The School Attorney’s Office will assist the administration at all polling sites to develop “best practices” on election days. • Examples: • Recruitment of volunteers • Re-routing students and/or staggering release times between classes to minimize direct, unsupervised contact between students and voters

  34. Conclusions & recommendations • Develop “best practices” for all voting sites (cont’d): • Examples: • Increasing staff “rounds” in the voting area through the day • Adopt a policy that no student walks unsupervised in hallways around voting area on election days • Adding signage to direct voter traffic

  35. Conclusions & recommendations • Implement site-specific changes for election days. • The School Attorney’s Office will assist the administration at certain schools to develop a plan to better meet the needs of their individual school. • Many of these changes can be made in time for the May primary elections.

  36. Conclusions & recommendations • Implement site-specific changes for election days (cont’d). • Examples: • Move polling to a better location on campus (i.e. gymnasium to media center) • If restrooms are in vicinity of polling site, designate staff restrooms to be used for voters and/or post signs discouraging use of student restrooms • At some schools, re-route voters on a more direct path to the polling site (i.e. through an outside door to the polling site)

  37. Conclusions & recommendations • Develop a plan to reduce/eliminate potential liability in parking/high traffic areas. • The School Attorney’s Office will assist the administration at all polling sites to develop a plan to improve traffic flow and parking lot safety issues.

  38. Conclusions & recommendations • Develop a plan to reduce/eliminate potential liability in parking/high traffic areas. (cont’d). • Examples: • Where appropriate, re-route bus drop-off location so that does not interfere with voter traffic • Reserve staff/visitor parking spaces for voters • Coordinate alternate arrival/dismissal locations and facilitate communication with parents regarding same

  39. Next steps

  40. Next Steps • We are scheduled to speak at upcoming level meetings to give a forecast of these changes • Although we have a general sense that the Board of Elections will not oppose our internal changes, the Board of Elections has not yet voted to adopt the “school exchange” recommendations. • The next Board of Elections meeting is scheduled for April 15, 2014.

  41. Questions? School Attorney’s Office Allison Tomberlin, General Counsel Sam Mills, Staff Attorney Dionne Jenkins, Staff Attorney

More Related