1 / 3

V rf =2.55 MV

CLIC e+ damping ring. layout. performance with 0.5% coupling & wiggler period l w =10 cm. equilibrium emittances. V rf =3.03 MV. V rf =2.55 MV. beam-based tuning & tolerances being studied. M. Korostelev, CERN & U Lausanne. why is CLIC emittance smaller than NLC value?.

rosa
Download Presentation

V rf =2.55 MV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CLIC e+ damping ring layout performance with 0.5% coupling & wiggler period lw=10 cm equilibrium emittances Vrf=3.03 MV Vrf=2.55 MV beam-based tuning & tolerances being studied M. Korostelev, CERN & U Lausanne

  2. why is CLIC emittance smaller than NLC value? *smaller emittance due to smaller bend angle / arc cell, less emittance detuning, more damping, smaller Hx in wiggler *higher energy reduces intrabeam-scattering effect

  3. e- cloud in CLIC e+ damping ring R. Wanzenberg D. Schulte F. Zimmermann ECLOUD’04 problem at B factories & concern for all LCs: photoelectrons and secondary electrons e- build up in arc dipole 1010 m-1 incident photons CLIC study profits from LHC efforts and SPS/PS experiments 10m-1 photons per meter per e+ with antechamber 1 m-1 assuming 0.06e-/m/e+ pessimistic; insensitive to dmax (1) antechamber not efficient in wiggler (2) e- build up in arcs can reach 1010 m-1, less with antechamber, independent of dmax (3) e- build up in wiggler ~5x109 m-1, depends on dmax (4) beam is stable for line densities of a few 109 m-1 (5) usual remedies work ~4 /m/e+ in wiggler ~0 /m/e+ in arcs note: l=1010 m-1 ~ r=8x1012 m-3 (simulated by ECLOUD code) (simulated by PHOTON code) e- cloud instability e- build up in wiggler 2x1010 m-1 20 kicks/turn preliminary! assuming 0.11e-/m/e+ sensitive to dmax l=2x1010 m-1 ~ r=3.5x1013 m-3 (simulated by ECLOUD code) further studies in EUROTeV (simulated by HEADTAIL code)

More Related