1 / 24

Do Institutions Cause Growth?

Do Institutions Cause Growth?. Edward Glaeser, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer. Context of Paper. Recent literature: good institutions are important necessary conditions for growth

rosalyn-sweet
Download Presentation

Do Institutions Cause Growth?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Do Institutions Cause Growth? Edward Glaeser, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer

  2. Context of Paper • Recent literature: good institutions are important necessary conditions for growth • This paper brings us back to human capital and questions some basic assumptions made in such literature

  3. Policies, a choice or consequence? • 2 ways of thinking about growth and its relation to institutions/democracy 1)Democracy as a necessary condition to growth • Democracy secures property rights • More investments in capital, human capital, etc. • Economic growth!! 2)Democracy as a result of growth • Capital and human capital increase (through policies, not institutions) • even dictators can secure property rights by choice  More negotiation/voting and less violence to resolve conflicts because of education • Education is necessary for courts to operate, public engagement in politics  Eventually democracy because increased education and wealth

  4. Case study: N. Korea vs. S. Korea

  5. Order of presentation • Critique of measures of “institutions” • Discuss OLS evidence on relationship between institutions, human capital, and growth. • Examine universe of poor countries in 1960 to find education level and institutional environment • Discuss AJR and their instruments • Revisit human capital accumulation vs. institutional quality by looking at timing • Conclusion

  6. II. Measurement of Institutions • Institutions: • “a set of rules, compliance procedures, and moral and ethical behavioral norms designed to constrain the behavior of individuals in the interests of maximizing the wealth or utility of principals.” (North, 1981) • Need permanent/durable constraints Are measures of institutions used in recent literature valid measures with this definition in mind?

  7. Measures of Institutions • International Country Risk Guide • Kaufmann et al. (2003) • Polity IV dataset • Measures of outcomes and not of permanent constraints • First two measures: dictators choosing “good” policies = governments who must • Uncorrelated with other available constitutional measures of constraints on government

  8. Measures of Institutions:International Country Risk Guide • Survey of risk assessment for international investors • Measures “law and order,” “bureaucratic quality,” “corruption, “risk of expropriation by gov’t,” etc.  Clearly not a measure of durable institutions providing constraints

  9. Measures of Institutions: Kaufmann et al. (2003) • Measures “government effectiveness” by combining “perceptions of the quality of public service provision, the quality of the bureaucracy, the competence of civil servants, the independence of the civil service from political pressures, and the credibility of the government’s commitment to policies into a single grouping.”  again, clearly ex post outcomes

  10. Measures of Institutions: Polity IV - 1 • “Constraints on the executive” measures “the extent of institutionalized constraints on the decision-making powers of chief executives, whether individuals or collectivities.” • “Democracy” measures “the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preference about alternative policies and leaders, the existence of institutional constraints of the exercise of power by the executive, and the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation.” • But is volatile according to electoral outcomes

  11. Measures of Institutions Polity IV - 2

  12. Measures of Institutions Polity IV - 3

  13. Measures of Institutions other options • “plurality” • “proportional representation” • “judicial independence”: permanency in office of supreme court judges • “constitutional review”: extent of judicial review of the constitution

  14. Measures of Institutions

  15. III. OLS on institutions, human capital, and growth

  16. OLS

  17. IV. Poor countries in 1960

  18. V. Instrumental Variables • Use instrumental variables to try and address problem of reverse causality • “distance from the equator and the extent to which the primary languages of Western Europe are spoken today” (Hall and Jones, 1999) • Legal transplantation (La Porta et al, 1997, 1998, 1999) • Mortality of European settlers (AJR, 2001)

  19. Instrumental Variables Validity of AJR’s instrument? • Did the Europeans bring institutions or their know-how and human capital? • Weak correlation between settler mortality and plurality and proportional representation • Correlation between early settler mortality and modern disease environment

  20. Instrumental Variablescorrelation with schooling in 1960

  21. VI. Schooling or institutions first? • By using lagged values of variables, should be able to predict outcome.

  22. Schooling then Institutions

  23. Conclusion • The human capital of the society, as well as efficiency, history, and politics, largely determine institutional opportunities • Institutional outcomes tend to improve with economic growth as opportunities improve • Current strategies to measure “institutions” are flawed • Do not support view that democratization and constraints on government must come first • More likely that countries can accumulate human and physical capital under dictators and then improve institutions as they become richer

More Related