350 likes | 596 Views
Ch. 5 Equal Employment and Diversity Management. Equal Employment Opportunity Affirmative Action Non-discriminatory practices. Potential HR Issues. English-Only Requirements and Bilingual Employees. Requirements for Immigrants and Foreign-Born Workers.
E N D
Ch. 5 Equal Employment and Diversity Management • Equal Employment Opportunity • Affirmative Action • Non-discriminatory practices
Potential HR Issues English-Only Requirements and Bilingual Employees Requirements for Immigrants and Foreign-Born Workers Racial/Ethnic Discrimination and Harassment Race, National Origin, and Citizenship Issues
2006 Charge Statistics from EEOC Note: Because individuals often file charges claiming multiple types of discrimination, the total percentages may exceed 100%. Total charges = 75,428. Source: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2006, www.eeoc.gov/stats/charges.html.
Sex/Gender Issues • Avoiding Pay Inequity: • Include benefits and other items of remuneration to calculate pay • Inform employees of pay practices • Base pay on the value of performance and job-related factors • Benchmark pay against local and national markets • Conduct internal audits to detect gender-based inequities and ensure that pay is fair.
Female Annual Earnings as Percentage of Male Earnings Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2006, www.bls.gov.
Women as Percentage of Total Employees by Selected Industries Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Employed Persons by Detailed Industry and Sex,” 2006, www.bls.gov.
Sex/Gender Issues • Women in the workforce • Nontraditional jobs • Glass ceilings, walls and elevators • Nepotism • Communication
Sex/Gender Issues: Breaking the Glass • Alternative work arrangements • Organizational diversity goals • Mentoring • Increase top management diversity
Sex/Gender Issues • Sexual Orientation • Courts and EEOC have ruled that sex discrimination under CRA Title VII applies to a person’s gender at birth. • Claims include hiring, firing, promotion processes
Sexual Harassment and Workplace Relationships • Consensual Relationships and Romance at Work • Workplace romances are risky • Policies prohibiting them are up substantially
Quid Pro Quo Hostile Environment Linking employment outcomes to the harassed individual’s granting of sexual favors. Allowing intimidating or offensive working conditionsto unreasonably affect an individual’s performance or psychological well-being. Types of Sexual Harassment
Potential Sexual Harassers • Supervisors • Coworkers • Other employees • Former employees • Customers • Vendors
Addressing the Issue of Sexual Harassment • Sexual harassment policy • Communicated • Consistently enforced • Training for awareness, behavior changes • Enabling complaints • Taking them seriously • Taking action
Sexual Harassment Liability Determination Source: Virginia Collins, PhD, SPHR, and Robert L. Mathis, PhD, SPHR, Omaha, Nebraska.
Age Issues and EEO • Discrimination against older “overqualified” workers • Age discrimination in workforce reductions • Attracting, retaining, managing older workers (protected class)
Consequences • Health care usage • Heath care costs • More training/retraining • Employee stress OlderWorkers • Advantages • Will work different schedules • Serve as mentors • Have invaluable experience • Have a strong work ethic • Are more reliable • Disadvantages • Are weak on new technology • Cause expenses to rise • Are less flexible HR Managers’ Views of Older Workers
Disabled Workers and Applicants • Recruiting and selecting individuals with disability • New disabilities • Mental disabilities • Life-threatening illnesses
Common Means of Reasonable Accommodation • Modified work schedules • Special equipment • Job redesign • Reassignment • Employer-provided assistance
Affirmative Action • Affirmative Action • Employers urged to hire from protected classes to make up for historical discrimination. • Affirmative Action and the Courts • Courts have upheld AA, but recently have limited it somewhat. • Reverse Discrimination • Occurs when a person is denied an opportunity because of preferences given to protected-class individuals who may be less qualified.
Affirmative ActionIs Still Needed Affirmative Action Is No Longer Needed • To overcome and eliminate the effects of past injustices. • To create equality for all persons, even if temporary injustice to some individuals may result. • Employment of protected-class members will benefit society. • Properly used, does not discriminate against males or whites. • Goals indicate progress needed, not quotas. • Penalizes individuals even though they have not been guilty of discrimination. • Creates preferences that result in reverse discrimination. • Results in greater polarization and separatism. • Stigmatizes those it is designed to help. • Forces employers to “play by the numbers” as goals become quotas. Debate on Affirmative Action
Affirmative Action Plan (AAP) • Federal government contractors with more than 50 employees and over $50,000 in government contracts annually • Required to document the inclusion of women and racial minorities in the workforce. • Covered employers must submit plans to narrow gap between the composition of workforce and composition of labor markets where they obtain employees.
Managing Diversity: Tangible Indicators • Age • Marital and family status • Disability • Race/ethnicity • Religion • Gender • Sexual Orientation
Diversity: The Business Case • Allows new talent and new ideas from employees of different backgrounds. • Helps recruiting and retention. • Allows for an increase in market share. • Leads to lower costs because there may be fewer lawsuits. Managing Diversity
Backlash Against Diversity Efforts Protected Groups Non-Protected Groups View diversity efforts as inadequate and nothing more than “corporate public relations” that do not meet expectations. Believe that the emphasis on diversity makes them scapegoats for problems created by increasing diversity. Diversity Training