100 likes | 291 Views
Predation Impacts of Round Goby on Zebra Mussels in the Great Lakes. Megan Fencil. Static vs. Dynamic modeling. In fisheries ecology, GIS is mainly used for descriptive mapping . Increased need for visualization of ecological models - spatially and temporally dynamic factors
E N D
Predation Impacts of Round Goby on Zebra Mussels in the Great Lakes Megan Fencil
Static vs. Dynamic modeling • In fisheries ecology, GIS is mainly used for descriptive mapping. • Increased need for visualization of ecological models - spatially and temporally dynamic factors - interaction of species when they meet • I’ll focus on predator-prey interaction of round gobies and zebra mussels • Difficulties: • Large number of assumptions • Too many interaction effects to model • Lack of data
Zebra mussel(Dreissena polymorpha) • Native to Russia • Introduced to U.S. in ballast water • Negative impacts: clog pipes, foul ships, litter beaches, sink buoys, colonize native animals • $5 billion cost in 10 years (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) • Positive impact: improved water clarity from 6 inches to 30 feet!
Zebra mussels spread very rapidly! 1st U.S. appearance in 1988: Lake St. Clair < 10 years: all Great Lakes, Mississippi, Tennessee, Hudson, and Ohio River basins
Round goby(Neogobius melanostomus) • Native to Black & Caspian Seas • Introduced to U.S. in ballast water • Negative impacts: • Aggressively eat eggs & fry of native fishes • Outcompete native species for nest sites • Excellent sensory system gives an advantage (night) • Very robust • Spawn over long time period in summer • Rapid population growth (20/m3 in Calumet Harbor = 20 fish in a bathtub)
Round gobies competitively displace native species Is there room for one more?
The spread of round gobies • 1990: St. Clair River (channel between Lake Huron and Lake St. Clair) • 1994: well-established in Lake Erie • 1995: Lake Superior and Lake Michigan Ohio State University Preventing the spread: electric goby barrier Map modified from USGS website,2001
Gobies eat up to 78 zebra mussels/day Gobies prefer small mussels near the substrate Mussels in goby-free waters are larger Gobies are main predators of mussels BUT, zebra mussels will not disappear due to gobies Negative effect of predation: mussels filter-feed and bioaccumulate toxins Sport fish (bass, walleyes, perch, trout) may be affected Interaction of gobies and zebra mussels
Work in Progress: Clarifying the problem with ArcGIS Apply a population growth model to overlaid distribution maps of mussels and gobies - Where do they interact? - What will be the effect on mussel population size? Population growth for prey (zebra mussels) population (Lotka-Volterra): dH / dt = r H - b1 H P H = number of prey P = number of predators r = rate of growth for prey population b1 = predation rate (coefficient expressing the efficiency of predation)
Predicting the potential spread of invasives • “Hitchhikers” are carried on/in recreational boats • If they arrive at an new site, can they survive? • Potential for invasion requires proper conditions: • Light • Depth • pH • Temperature • Food supply Overlay of layers can predict invasion success - Several currently uncolonized sites will be studied - Can they support zebra mussels and/or round gobies?