1 / 34

National Science Foundation Grant

This National Science Foundation grant of $350,000 supports research on problem-solving methods in chemical engineering. Undergraduate and graduate students collaborate with industry professionals, visiting companies like Dow, DuPont, and Shell to learn about problem-solving approaches and challenges. The research focuses on elevator speed, solvent improvement, oil recovery, printing ink quality, Darfur cookstove design, and agricultural production in Australia.

rosellab
Download Presentation

National Science Foundation Grant

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Science Foundation Grant • $350,000 Grant to Research Problem Solving • Teams of Undergraduate and Graduate Students interacted with Industry • Summers visiting Industries around the US Dow, DuPont, Dow Corning, Amaco, Shell General Mills, Eli Lilly, Proctor and Gamble Monsanto, Chevron,etc. To learn how they went about solving problems and what was the greatest hurtle they faced in Problem Solving Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  2. What’s the Problem? Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  3. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  4. The Annoying Wait Shortly after the upper floors of a hotel got renovated, guests started to complain that the elevators were too slow. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  5. The Annoying Wait The manager’s instructions to solve the perceived problem: “Find a way to speed up the elevators.” Next, the manager’s directions were: “Find a location and design a shaft to install another elevator.” Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  6. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  7. Find a Better Solvent A few years ago a major oil company was developing a process for the Department of Energy to produce liquid petroleum products from coal in order to reduce the U.S. dependence on foreign oil. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  8. Find a Better Solvent In this process, solid coal particles were ground up, mixed with solvent and hydrogen, then passed through a furnace heater to a reactor that would convert the coal to gasoline. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  9. The Better Solvent Sometime after installation excessive amounts of a tar-like material were being deposited on the pipes in the furnace, causing fouling and plugging. Management told its engineers “Find a better solvent” Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  10. The Better Solvent • Why is the Deposit Forming? • Brainstorm and List all the Possible Causes. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  11. Improving Oil Recovery Perceived Problem Statement: “Find ways to improve oil recovery” Real Problem Statement “Learn why the well is not producing as expected” Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  12. New Bills Perceived Problem Statement: “Find a Better Printing Ink” Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  13. Better Problem Statement. Brainstorm and List all the things that could cause the ink to smear. New Bills Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  14. Darfur Cookstoves Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  15. Real vs. Perceived Problem: Darfur Perceived Problem Statement: “Design a screw press for Darfurians to turn garbage into biofuel pellets ” Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  16. Real vs. Perceived Problem: Darfur Perceived Problem Statement: “Design a screw press for Darfurians to turn garbage into biofuel pellets ” Not sufficient solid waste to meet the demands. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  17. Real vs. Perceived Problem: Darfur Perceived Problem Statement: “Design a screw press for Darfurians to turn garbage into biofuel pellets ” Real Problem Statement: “Redesign the cooking stove to obtain higher temperatures and make it more fuel efficient.” Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  18. Murray River Dams Right Problem Definition BUT Wrong Solution Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  19. Dam the Torpedo or Torpedo the Dam? The Australian government wanted to increase agricultural production by finding ways to grow crops on wastelands. It was decided to cultivate land in the New South Wales region of southeastern Australia, which is very arid. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  20. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  21. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  22. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  23. Dam the Torpedo or Torpedo the Dam? The following solution was chosen by the Australian government: “Design and build a dam to divert the river water inland to irrigate the land.” Unfortunately, no new vegetation grew. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  24. KT Potential Problem Analysis Unfortunately they did not apply The Kepner-Tregoe Strategy Potential Problem Analysis to learn what could go wrong Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  25. London Underground Right Problem Definition BUT Wrong Solution Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  26. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  27. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  28. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  29. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  30. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  31. Define Generate Implement Evaluate Decide A Heuristic Find Out Where the Problem Came From Explore the Problem PS/DS-Duncker Diagram Statement-Restatement Blockbusting Osborn’s Checklist Random Stimulation/Other People’s Views Analogy Situation (Timing, Trend, Impact) K.T. Analyses Problem (Is/Is Not) Decision (Musts/Wants) Potential Problem Gantt Chart Plan Deployment Chart Critical Path Carry Through Experimental Design Satisfy Objectives Ethical Considerations Safety Considerations Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  32. Improving Oil Recovery Perceived Problem Statement: “Find ways to improve oil recovery” Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  33. The Five Steps of the Heuristic Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  34. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

More Related