1 / 6

In Irvine we ………….

In Irvine we …………. Agreed that the Governing Board was the final authority when conflicts arose within SCCOOS or policy needed to be established Agreed that SCCOOS was a consortium of ocean observers

rosina
Download Presentation

In Irvine we ………….

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. In Irvine we …………. Agreed that the Governing Board was the final authority when conflicts arose within SCCOOS or policy needed to be established Agreed that SCCOOS was a consortium of ocean observers Agreed to establish an active salesman/client relation with potential users (rather than to be governed by them) Agreed that SCCOOS would have many projects with a broad range of foci Suggested organization around a matrix of Operating Divisions (our specialties) and Projects (and sources of funding)

  2. In Santa Barbara we …… Agreed to have an Executive Committee of the Governing Board for rapid decision-making as needed Agreed to have Operating Divisions (representing our specialties) and Projects (e.g COCMP, E & O, NOOA Pilot) Established an Operating Board (at least for COCMP) for technical planning and asset allocation. Members were selected Appointed COCMP Executive Committee members Agreed that the SCCOOS Executive Committee would arbitrate any unresolved debates in he Operating Board Agreed on ground rules for what collaborative work belongs in SCCOOS Agreed to set aside a couple of days as a retreat to develop a longer range plan and priorities

  3. A Possible SCCOOS Organization • Reflect present SCCOOS organization around Operating Divisions with fluid & broad membership and Projects with distinct requirements. • Provide flexibility for a wide range of projects with potentially different needs for decision making and external interfacing • Provide for central functions are (like soliciting/accepting projects, organizing projects, providing a national face, planning, oversight of data dissemination, product development, contracting) under the Governing Board & Executive Committee. • Show the Operating Board as a COCMP Op Board – only COCMP has its decision-making structure

  4. SCCOOS Organization Chart California Ocean Science Trust Users Governing Board Executive Comm COO Agencies Business Customer Service Product Distrib Users’ Board OOI Orion Cal Conserv II Educ & Outreach NOAA Pilot IOOS RA COCMP ? Projects Remote Sensing Near Shore HF Radar Ocean Obs Data Manage Fish Habitat Modeling Operating Divisions

  5. COCMP Structure Cal Coastal Conservancy SCCOOS Executive Committee COCMP Executive Committee Moline, Chao, Terrill SCCOOS COCMP Operating Board (Davis Chr) Terrill Jones HF Radar Special Sites McWilliams Di Giacamo Ocean Observations Remote Sense Chao Guza Nearshore & Transition Zone Assim & Modeling

  6. Things To Do (Russ’ version) • Establish a way to get long-range planning done without prejudicing the range of future SCCOOS projects • Establish a way to do medium-range planning for the Orion/OOI opportunity • Flesh out structures for the projects we will be involved in and pick people to be responsible • NOAA Pilot and Orion/OOI have decisions looming • Flesh out Operating Divisions and energize their planning • Establish the equivalent of by-laws or a charter for: • the Governing Board; • individual and SCCOOS projects; • any other entities that make decisions

More Related