610 likes | 1.37k Views
Information Systems Planning. Part 2. Information Systems Planning in an organization. Need for planning Improperly planned projects result in systems that cannot be shared across an organization
E N D
Information Systems Planning Part 2
Information Systems Planning in an organization • Need for planning • Improperly planned projects result in systems that cannot be shared across an organization • As business processes change, lack of integration will hamper strategy and business process changes
Advantages of IS planning • Allow to construct ISs that support the whole organisation • Allow integration of different tools • Avoid data redundancy • Reduce maintenance costs because planned system will require less revision • Plans enable communication • To enable and support intra-organizational communication • To create a shared mental image of team members’ role • Plans enable unity of purpose • To specify the objective of IS deployment • Clear responsibilities are agreed upon • Plans simplify decision making over time • To create a context for decision making
Description of three process that play significant role in project selection • Value chain analysis • Information System Planning • Corporate Strategic Planning
Information Systems Planning in an organization • Information system planning” is different from “project planning” • Information System Planning (ISP) is the process by which a company (organisation) analyses its information needs and plan its project carefully • ISP is an orderly means of assessing the information needs of an organisation and defining the systems, databases, and technologies that will best satisfy those needs
Information Systems Planning in an organization • ISP requires support of top management and its commitment to reach desired objectives. • Techniques used to capture information system needs, include • Interviewing managers and executives • Reviewing corporate documents • Analysing competitors, markets and products • Three key activities: • Describe the Current Situation • Describe the Target (or Future) Situation • Develop a Transition Plan and Strategy 5.6
Information Systems Planning in an organization • Information Systems Planning • Describing the Current Situation There are two approaches to describe current situation needs • Top-down Planning • Generic methodology that attempts to gain a broad understanding of the information system needs of the entire organization • Bottom-up Planning • Generic methodology that identifies and defines IS development projects based upon solving operational business problems or taking advantage of some business opportunities 5.7
Information Systems Planning in an organization 1. Describing the Current Situation (Continued) Include : • Planning team is chartered to model existing situation. • Identification of Organizational: • Locations • Units • Functions • Processes • Data • Information Systems 5.8
Information collected about current situation • Locations where the company operates • Business unit that operate within a company • Functions= cross organisational collection of activities used to perform day-to-day business operation. • Processesof a company • Data underlying processes • Information system represent automated and non automated systems used to support business processes.
Information Systems Planning in an organization 2. Describing the Target Situation • Define situation and update list of organizational locations, functions, etc. to reflect desired locations, functions, etc. • Planners focus on differences between current lists and future lists and
Information Systems Planning in an organization 3-Developing a transition strategy and plans • Plans reflect both short-term and long-term organisational development needs • Plans include organisational mission, information inventory, mission and objectives of IS, constraints, long-term plans and short-term plans • Selected projects are those derived from ISP and that fulfil the gap between current and desired situation
Corporate Strategy Planning (CSP) • Effective deployment of resources require clearly understanding of organisational missions, objectives & strategy • Corporate Strategy Planning is a top-down process of three steps • CSP is an ongoing process that defines the mission, objectives and strategies of an organisation • CSP is a process that is frequently subject to change • It requires constant surveillance
Analysis of strategic position: what is the current position? Desired strategic position: what are the objectives Design of the possible strategies to achieve desired goals Process of corporate strategy planning Steps:
Future enterprise • Desired situation for informational needs • Listing of manual & automated processes • Listing of manual & automated data • Technology inventory • Human resources inventory Strategic plan • Schedule of projects to transit from current to desired • Project 1 • Project 2 • ---- ISP and Corporate Strategy Planning Current enterprise • Current situation for informational needs • Listing of manual & automated processes • Listing of manual & automated data • Technology inventory • Human resources inventory
Strategic Alignment • A high degree of fit and consonance between the priorities and activities of the IS function and the strategic direction of the firm • Careful planning is critical for strategic alignments, especially for firms in highly competitive environments.
Six Key IS Decisions • How much should we spend on IT? • What the role of IS and technology should be • Which business processes should receive the IT dollars? • What business processes are most important • Which IT capabilities need to be companywide? • The cost/benefits of standardization and flexibility • How good do our IT services really need to be? • The degree of service the firm needs and are willing to pay for • What security and privacy risks will we accept? • Whom do we blame if an IT initiative fails? • Allocate resources and assign responsibility for IS projects
Strategic IS Planning • A partnership between • Those with technical skills • The information systems group • General and functional managers • Objective: • Define how the firm plans to use and manage IS resources to fulfill its strategic objectives
Strategic IS Planning Process • Gathering information about the current availability and performance of IS resources • Providing a roadmap for decision-making about information systems
Strategic IS Planning Process • Strategic business planning • IS assessment • IS vision • IS Guidelines • Strategic Initiatives An Iterative Process
Strategic Business Planning Know Who You Are • An organization's mission and future direction, performance targets, and strategy. • Effective IS planning can only occur when there is a clear understanding of the firm: • What makes it successful • The business strategy • Its future goals and objectives
Information Systems Assessment Know Where You Start • The process of • Taking stock of the firm’s current IS resources • Evaluating how well they are fulfilling the needs of the organization • IS resources • Technical resources: hardware, software and networking components of the IT infrastructure • Data and information resources: databases and other information repositories • Human resources: skills, attitudes, preconceptions, reporting structures and incentive systems of IS professionals and the user community • Output: a snapshot of the current “state of IS resources” in the organization.
Information Systems Vision Know Where You Want To Go • Based on the role that information systems should play in the organization • Defines the ideal state the firm should strive for, in its use and management of its resources • More IT-intensive firms: IS may play a strategic role • Less IT-intensive firms: IS may be a “necessary evil”
Information Systems Vision The Information Systems Vision The Firm’s Business Strategy • The IS vision is unique and highly specific to a given firm. • Two analytical tools: • Critical Success Factors (CSF) methodology • Strategic impact grid aligned and reflect
Critical Success Factors • The limited number of areas which managers must effectively control to ensure that the firm will survive and thrive • It ensures that the planning team is able to prioritize • It focuses on business objectives, not on information systems
The Strategic Impact Grid • It enables simultaneous evaluation of the firm’s current and future information systems needs.
The Strategic Impact Grid • Current need for reliable information systems • Focuses on current day-to-day operations and the functionalities of the existing systems • Future needs for new information system functionalities • Focuses on the strategic role that new IT capabilities play for the organization • The strategic impact grid defines what the use of information systems resources should be going forward.
Support Quadrant • IS are not mission critical for current operations • New systems promise little strategic differentiation • The firm: • Views IS as a tool to support and enable operations • Considers IS to offer little potential to significantly benefit the organization • Is generally conservative in IS investments
Factory Quadrant • Even a small disruptions to IS infrastructure can endanger the firm’s well-being and future viability. • A limited potential for new systems and functionalities to make a substantial contribution. • The firm: • Closely monitors its current systems • Needs to be willing to fund their maintenance and upgrade. • But takes a conservative stance toward future investments.
Turnaround Quadrant • IS are not mission critical for current operations • New IS or new functionalities of existing systems will be critical for the business’ future viability and success. • The firm: • Is readying to change its information systems posture • Needs to engage in some reorganization
Strategic Quadrant • IS are critical to the firm’s current operations • New IS or new functionalities of existing systems is critical for the future viability and prosperity of the business. • The firm: • should be extremely proactive with respect to information systems and IT investments.
Information Systems Guidelines Know How You Are Going To Get There • Information systems architecture • A set of statements specifying how the firm should use its technical and organizational IS resources to achieve the IS vision • Purposes • Enable communication • Establish responsibility • Guide future decision making
Purposes of IS Guidelines • Communication • To simplify tactical and operational decision-making • To ensure that future decisions are aligned with the information systems vision • Identify responsibilities • To set expectations for behavior • Long range decision support • Must be general enough to provide direction over a number of years • Must be actionable
Technical IS Guidelines • Address future decisions pertaining to • The hardware and software infrastructure • Networking services • The storage and protection of organizational data and information • Do not specify vendor, particular platforms or applications • They are relatively general
Organizational IS Guidelines • Address those decisions that pertain to • Human resources • The organization of the IS function • Reporting and hierarchical structures • Focus on • IT governance issue • Outsourcing and vendors relationships • Human resource decisions
Information Systems SWOT Know How Well Equipped You Are To Get There • SWOT analysis focused on the firm’s current IS resources and capabilities • Remember IS planning is iterative • The IS vision may need to be revised according to the result of the SWOT analysis. • The firm should be clear about what to do during the current planning cycle after • Having read the SWOT analysis • Given the proposed vision and the guidelines
Proposed Strategic Initiatives From Planning To Action • Long-term (three to five year) proposals that identify new systems and new projects or new directions for the IS organization. • These initiatives need to • Identify a set of future avenues for exploitation of the IS resources • Be tightly aligned with the IS vision and the proposed role of IS in the organization