330 likes | 808 Views
Basis of triple assessment". Clinical examinationImaging: mammogram, ultrasoundCellular or tissue diagnosis. History: Presenting complaint. LumpPainNipple dischargeSkin or nipple changeAlteration in size or shape of breast . Breast lump. SiteDurationMobilityVariationPain/tenderness. Brea
E N D
1. The symptomatic breast patient – revision of history, examination and basic investigations Roger Watkins,
Consultant Surgeon,
Derriford Hospital, Plymouth
2. Basis of “triple assessment” Clinical examination
Imaging: mammogram, ultrasound
Cellular or tissue diagnosis
3. History: Presenting complaint Lump
Pain
Nipple discharge
Skin or nipple change
Alteration in size or shape of breast
4. Breast lump Site
Duration
Mobility
Variation
Pain/tenderness
5. Breast pain (mastalgia) Site
Description
Radiation
Variation including cyclical changes
Exacerbating and relieving factors
6. Nipple discharge Spontaneous - expressible
Single duct –multi-duct
Colour
Amount
7. Relevant past history Age at menarche and menopause
Oral contraceptive and HRT usage
Pregnancies and breast feeding
Previous breast disease
Family history breast and ovarian cancer
8. Breast examination Skin and nipple - Dimpling or nipple inversion
Ulceration
Erythema
Oedema
Discrepancy in size
9. Examination of the axillary and supra-clavicular lymph nodes Number
Size
Consistency
Position
Mobility
10. Investigations Standard investigations:
Mammogram, ultrasound
Additional investigations:
MR1, PET, thermograms, scintigraphy
11. Mammograms: Indications Patient aged over 40 years with significant symptoms or signs
Recent nipple inversion
Blood stained discharge
Mass lesion
Axillary lymphadenopathy
Family history
12. Mammograms: Standard views Medio-lateral oblique
Cranio-caudal
13. Mammograms: medio-lateral oblique
14. Mammograms: cranio-caudal
15. Mammograms: additional views Extended cranio-caudal (medial or lateral extension)
True lateral (medio-lateral)
Spot views with compression +magnification
Eklund technique to displace prostheses
16. Magnification mammograms; spot views
17. Mammographic features Technical quality
General appearance
(density of tissue - Wolfe pattern)
Abnormalities
Asymmetry
Abnormal density
Stromal distortion
Mass lesion
Calcification
18. Ultrasound: Indications Discrete mass v diffuse nodularity?
Mass lesion: solid versus cystic?
Solid mass lesion: benign versus malignant?
19. Ultrasound
20. Breast ultra-sound Standard images
characteristics of discrete lesions
outline, echogenicity, shape, shadowing
or attenuation
Colour flow Doppler
blood flow
21. Cytology versus HistologyFNAC versus WBCNB Ease
Speed of procedure and diagnosis
Patient acceptability
Accuracy of diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity
Diagnosis of invasion?
Repeat procedure?
22. Evolution of Core Biopsy Needles Manual - TruCut
Semi-automatic – SuperCore (spring loaded)
Automatic – Bard Gun – UltraCore, TruCore
Vacuum assisted – Vacora
23. FNAC v WBCNB Results FNAC
C1 inadequate
C2 benign
C3 probably benign
C4 suspicious of malignancy
C5 malignant WBCNB
B1 normal tissue
B2 benign lesion
B3 probably benign
B4 suspicious of malignancy
B5 malignant
B5a in situ
B5b invasive
B5c indeterminate
24. WB CNB: Additional information In situ versus invasive tumour
Histological grade and type of tumour
ER and PR status
HER2 status
Marker placement
25. Special problems (1)– Paget’s disease Nipple inflammation, erosion, ulceration, bleeding
Paget’s disease versus eczema
Nipple sparing, areola only affected
Unilateral versus bilateral?
Other lesions?
27. Paget’s disease – punch or wedge biopsy
28. Paget’s disease – exfoliative cytology
29. Special problems (2) – inflammatory carcinoma Generalised enlargement of breast but no discrete mass
Oedema of overlying skin (peau d’orange)
Erythema
Nodal enlargement
Negative imaging
Skin biopsy: tumour cells in dermal lymphatics
30. Special problems (3) –Augmentation mammoplasty
32. Special problems (3) –Augmentation mammoplasty Careful mammography
Very careful FNAC and CB (ultrasound control)
33. Conclusions: Diagnosis Accurate history
Careful examination
Appropriate investigations – not every patient requires full triple assessment
34. Conclusions: Diagnosis Unequivocal diagnosis: benign v. malignant
Plan treatment
Equivocal diagnosis (discordant results)
Assume most suspicious result(s) to be accurate:
repeat initial investigations
plan further investigations
open biopsy but not frozen section