1 / 36

Targeting Learning Learning Objectives: A Tool in the Formative Assessment Process

Targeting Learning Learning Objectives: A Tool in the Formative Assessment Process. CVUHSD 2013-14.

rozene
Download Presentation

Targeting Learning Learning Objectives: A Tool in the Formative Assessment Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Targeting LearningLearning Objectives:A Tool in the Formative Assessment Process CVUHSD 2013-14

  2. Targeting Learning & Direct Interactive Instruction (DII)Standards and Measurable ObjectivesWhen teachers ground their lessons in explicit standards and measurable objectives that define what students will know and be able to do at the end of—the lesson, the chapter, the course, the semester—clarity of focus is assured for students. When the teacher is focused on what “the end” looks like and what students will demonstrate to “show they know,” much more effective and targeted instruction is possible.1. Standards and Measurable Objectives2. Lesson Structure and Sequence3. Student Engagement, Feedback, and Correctives4. Proactive Classroom Management. CVUHSD 2013-14

  3. Targeting LearningTerminal Learning Objective:Given two primary types of learning objectives and their components, I will demonstrate mastery of writing both types of learning objectives by constructing appropriately specific objectives and implementing the practice in my classroom starting tomorrow. CVUHSD 2013-14

  4. Targeting LearningEnabling Learning Objective 1:Given a theoretical framework for targeted learning, I will challenge my preconceived knowledge related to learning objectives (cognitive dissonance) by examining the elements of writing evidence-based learning objectives through discussion and reflection. CVUHSD 2013-14

  5. Cognitive DissonanceA psychological phenomenon which refers to the discomfort felt at a discrepancy between what you already know or believe, and new information or interpretation. It therefore occurs when there is a need to accommodate new ideas, and it may be necessary for it to develop so that we become "open" to them. Drive an intellectual wedge between learners' current beliefs and "reality“. CVUHSD 2013-14

  6. Targeting LearningEnabling Learning Objective 2:Given the components of evidence-based learning objectives, I will evaluate my understanding of each component by categorizing a series of examples as either effective or not effective. CVUHSD 2013-14

  7. Targeting LearningEnabling Learning Objective 3:Given the theoretical framework, the learning objective components, and practice identifying the elements of a evidence-based learning objective, I will demonstrate mastery by writing an effective learning objective. CVUHSD 2013-14

  8. Thus, the two primary types of learning objectives are terminal and enabling. CVUHSD 2013-14

  9. COMPONENTS OF THE OBJECTIVES Content/Knowledge Condition Level of Cognition Proving Behavior CVUHSD 2013-14

  10. Level of Cognition ACTION VERB THE CONTENT OR THE “WHAT” IS EXPECTED OF THE LEARNER Conditions of Learning Environment CVUHSD 2013-14 Proving Behavior & Measureable Criteria

  11. UNDERSTAND THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKConstructivismis a philosophical view on how we come to understand or know. It is, in our mind, attuned to pragmatism (If everything that can be known must be first learned, and if knowledge aims at truth, then the method of learning should aim at the truth). John Dewey, The American Pragmatist CVUHSD 2013-14

  12. UNDERSTAND THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKUnderstanding is in our interactions with the environment. This is the core concept of constructivism. We cannot talk about what is learned separately from how it is learned, as if a variety of experiences all lead to the same understanding. Rather, what we understand is a function of the content, the context, the activity of the learner, and, perhaps most importantly, the goals of the learner. CVUHSD 2013-14

  13. UNDERSTAND THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKCognitive conflict or puzzlement is the stimulus for learning and determines the organization and nature of what is learned. When we are in a learning environment, there is some stimulus or goal for learning -- the learner has a purpose for being there. That goal is not only the stimulus for learning, but it is a primary factor in determining what the learner attends to, what prior experience the learner brings to bear in constructing an understanding, and, basically, what understanding is eventually constructed. CVUHSD 2013-14

  14. UNDERSTAND THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKCognitive conflict or puzzlement is the stimulus for learning and determines the organization and nature of what is learned. In Dewey's terms it is the "problematic" that leads to and is the organizer for learning. In Piaget’s terms it is the need for accommodation when current experience cannot be assimilated in existing schema. The important point, however, is that it is the goal of the learner that is central in considering what is learned. CVUHSD 2013-14

  15. UNDERSTAND THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKKnowledge evolves through social negotiation and through the evaluation of the viability of individual understandings. Learners test their own understanding and examine the understanding of others as a mechanism for enriching, interweaving, and expanding our understanding of particular issues or phenomena. Collaborating with other people who challenge our current views create the cognitive dissonance critical to the learning process (this is also true for teachers who collaborate with each other to analyze the impact of their teaching practices). CVUHSD 2013-14

  16. HANDOUT 1Targeting the Target – Finding Appropriate Specificity

  17. LEARNING OBJECTIVE: Given 9 examples of a learning objective, I will test my prior knowledge of writing appropriately specific learning objectives by categorizing each example as either too general, too specific, or appropriately specific and completing the chart above.

  18. CVUHSD 2013-14

  19. CVUHSD 2013-14

  20. CVUHSD 2013-14

  21. CVUHSD 2013-14

  22. LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND THE CCSS While the CCSS focus on what is most essential, they do not describe all that can or should be taught. A great deal is left to the discretion of teachers and curriculum developers. The aim of the CCSS is to articulate the fundamentals, not to set out an exhaustive list or a set of restrictions that limits what can be taught beyond what is specified herein. Therefore, unpacking the standards has never been more important than now. CVUHSD 2013-14

  23. Graph exponential and logarithmic functions, showing intercepts and end behavior, and trigonometric functions, showing period, midline, and amplitude.Fit a linear function for a scatter plot that suggests a linear association.Correctly use frequently confused words (e.g., to/too/two; there/their).Place phrases and clauses within a sentence, recognizing and correcting misplaced and dangling modifiers. CVUHSD 2013-14

  24. Graph exponential and logarithmic functions, showing intercepts and end behavior, and trigonometric functions, showing period, midline, and amplitude.Fit a linear function for a scatter plot that suggests a linear association.Correctly use frequently confused words (e.g., to/too/two; there/their).Place phrases and clauses within a sentence, recognizing and correcting misplaced and dangling modifiers. CVUHSD 2013-14

  25. What type of learning objective is this CCSS?Correctly use frequently confused words (e.g., to/too/two; there/their). CVUHSD 2013-14

  26. What type of learning objective is this CCSS?Correctly use frequently confused words (e.g., to/too/two; there/their). TERMINAL CVUHSD 2013-14

  27. Correctly use frequently confused words (e.g., to/too/two; there/their, etc…). What do I want students to be able to do? I will DEMONSTRATE correct word usage when using frequently confused words in my writing Given 10 frequently confused words By constructing sentences using the correct form of the word and present my answers to the class.

  28. STANDARD: Correctly use frequently confused words (e.g., to/too/two; there/their, etc…). Given 10 frequently confused words, I will demonstrate correct word usage by constructing sentences using the correct form of the word and present my answers to the class. CVUHSD 2013-14

  29. Writing an Enabling Objective OVERARCHING OR TERMINAL OBJECTIVE Correctly use frequently confused words (e.g., to/too/two; there/their, etc…).

  30. What do I want students to be able to do? Correctly identify frequently confused words (e.g., to/too/two; there/their, etc…).

  31. What are the learning conditions? Groups of students will be given a list of sentences which contain examples of correct and incorrect word usage.

  32. What is the expected level of cognition? Students will IDENTIFY sentences that use the words correctly and those that use the words incorrectly

  33. What will the proving behavior be? Present their answers to the class.

  34. Content/Knowledge Condition Level of Cognition Proving Behavior CVUHSD 2013-14

  35. STANDARD: Correctly use frequently confused words (e.g., to/too/two; there/their, etc…). Given a series of sentences containing frequently confused words, students will identify the examples of correct or incorrect usage and present their answers to the class. CVUHSD 2013-14

  36. HANDOUT 2 Writing Learning Objectives Using CCSS

More Related