160 likes | 205 Views
Explore a tele-EMS program integrating video conferencing to improve prehospital triage, reduce ambulance transports, and cut costs. Case study in Houston, TX, showed significant benefits.
E N D
Designing a Telehealth-Guided Alternative Delivery Model for Emergency Medical ServicesAmerican Medical Informatics AssociationNov 6, 2018 James Langabeer, PhD Michael Gonzalez, MD Andrew Winburn, MS Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer, PhD
Disclosures • Nothing to disclose and no conflicts of interest
Background • Estimated 30-40% of EMS calls are non-urgent, primary care related • Ambulance and paramedic crews are limited • Telehealth offers a potential solution
Objective • Assess the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of a tele-EMS program integrating video conferencing
Study Setting • Study Setting: Houston Texas (4th largest metropolitan area in US) • One of the largest fire-based EMS crews in the nation (3700 EMS responders/firefighters) • Division of the Houston Fire Department (85% of all incidents involved EMS; 15% fire) • 300,000+ annual medical incidents • 63 Ambulances + 175 engines/ladder trucks/ squad vehicles for response
Study Design • Case control study design • Inclusion criteria: adult patients with non-acute symptoms • Intervention involved an alternative to ‘treat & transport to ED’ model: • Telehealth-guided triage and disposition • Alternative transportation • Network of community-based health centers • Mobile health solutions involving telehealth, clinic scheduling, taxis, and HIE access • Primary outcomes: cost and reduction in ED ambulance transports
Technology • Commercially available telehealth app on all paramedic tablets • Video transmitted (and stored) to EMS base station physicians • Dialogue between patients, medics, and doctors (average of 3 minutes)
The Process Time, Costs
Results • 14,760 patients in 3 full years • Significant reduction in ambulance transports (74% to 12%) • Faster unit turnaround times (44 minutes) • $103 average reduction in cost effectiveness • $1.52 million total benefit over three years
Barriers • Patient education and resistance (shared decision making) • Technology and systems development (costs, interoperability) • Financing and reimbursement (policy issues)
Conclusions • Telehealth can improve prehospital triage and patient navigation • Telehealth offers an alternative to the traditional EMS ‘treat and transport’ model • Telehealth should be explored and adopted in other geographies and municipalities • Barriers exist for widespread adoption
References • Winburn A, Brixey J, Langabeer J, and Champagne-Langabeer T. (2017). A Systematic Review of Prehospital Telehealth Utilization. J Telemedicine Telecare, https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X17713140.
Thank You James.R.Langabeer@uth.tmc.edu