1 / 7

RFA-RM-04-011

RFA-RM-04-011. Dynamic Assessment of Patient-Reported Chronic Disease Outcomes Peer Review Issues Michael Micklin Center for Scientific Review. The Review Task. U01 Mechanism Two Types of Applications Individual Research Proposals

rrandall
Download Presentation

RFA-RM-04-011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RFA-RM-04-011 Dynamic Assessment of Patient-Reported Chronic Disease Outcomes Peer Review Issues Michael Micklin Center for Scientific Review

  2. The Review Task • U01 Mechanism • Two Types of Applications • Individual Research Proposals • With added concept proposals for network-wide collection of self-report data • Proposals for a statistical coordination center • Funding Guidelines • 3-6 Primary Research Sites • 1 Statistical Coordinating Center

  3. The Review Task (continued) • Standard Review Criteria • Significance • Approach • Innovation • Investigator • Environment • Human Subjects Inclusion and Protection

  4. The Review Task (continued) • Additional Review Criteria • PRS Independent Projects • Relevance to measurement of patient-report outcomes • Fit with specific objectives of the RFA • PRS Network Concepts • Fit with RFA objectives • Diverse patient population available • Protection of patient information and confidentiality • Supportive institutional environment • Potential to work collaboratively

  5. The Review Task (continued) • Additional Review Criteria (continued) • Statistical Coordinating Center • Record of interdisciplinary collaboration • Appropriate information technology and its utility in a clinical setting • Protection of patient information and confidentiality • Dissemination plans for the CAT tool • Is CAT tool user friendly? • Data Sharing and Data access Plan

  6. Obstacles and Challenges • September council date, July review meeting • Additional review criteria • How to weight and sum? • Reviewer Recruitment • Conflicts • Study section responsibilities • Summer date (vacations, travel) • Specialized expertise required, limited supply?

  7. How Program Staff Can Help • Provide names and contact information of potential reviewers • Help identify and list names and institutions of conflicts • Help contact and recruit potential reviewers

More Related