180 likes | 198 Views
Analysis of energy levels and interactions in molecular states to understand observed deviations from expectations.
E N D
f3D2 energetics and interaction with V,v´=8 & f3D1 energetics and interaction with V,v´=9 Shifts of levels and peaks(?) agust,www,....january09/PPT-030309ak.ppt
f3D2, f / P,R state; i.e. D- (see 241208;2) J´(higher) J´(higher) agust,heima,...january09/Term values for triplet paper-030309kmak.xls
f3D2, e / O,Q,S state; i.e. D+ (see 241208;2) DE(DE(e)) DE(e) DE(DE(e))
DE J´,J´-1 J´(higher) agust, heima, ...january09/Term values for triplet paper-190209kmak.xls
To be expected: - f3D2 (e) (f D+)(see 241208;2) + + V1S+,v´=8 + 5 - 3 4 5 6 7 - 5 + 4 + - + parities 3 4 5 6 7
Hence observations are not according to expectations • IF anything it seems to be the opposite effect, i.e. the gap between J´= 4 & 5 decreases • instead of increses • Large fluctuations in DE(DE) are observed suggesting that uncertainty is too large and • That insignificant shifts of levels are endeed observed • Let´s now see what shifts the W12 values obtained for f3D2 <-> V,v´=8 interaction will • correspond to
f3D1, f / P,R state; i.e. D- (see 241208;2) J´(higher) J´(higher) agust,heima,...january09/Term values for triplet paper-030309kmak.xls
f3D1, e / O,Q,S state; i.e. D+ (see 241208;2) DE(DE(e)) DE(e) DE(DE(e)) J´(higher) J´(higher) agust,heima,...january09/Term values for triplet paper-030309kmak.xls
DE J´,J´-1 J´(higher) agust, heima, ...january09/Term values for triplet paper-190209kmak.xls
To be expected: - DE(e) f3D1 (e) (fD+)(see 241208;2) V1S+,v´=9 - + 6 6 + - 5 5 - 3 4 5 6 7 4 + DE(DE(e)) - + parities 3 4 5 6 7
Hence observations are not according to expectations • IF anything it seems to be the opposite effect, i.e. the gap between J´= 5 & 6 increases • (see slide 8) instead of decreases • Large fluctuations in DE(DE) are observed suggesting that uncertainty is too large and • That insignificant shifts of levels are endeed observed • NB: according to • agust,heima,....january09/Term values for triplet paper-030309kmak.xls • The same seems to hold for the “New State”, i.e. • IF anything it seems to be the opposite effect, i.e. the gap between J´= 5 & 6 increases • (see slide 12) instead of decreases • g3S+(1) <-> V,v´=9 • See next pages: agust, heima, ...january09/Term values for triplet paper-190209kmak.xls
agust, heima, ...january09/Term values for triplet paper-190209kmak.xls
To be expected: - DE(e) g3S+(1) (e) V1S+,v´=9 - + 6 6 + - 5 5 - 3 4 5 6 7 4 + DE(DE(e)) - + parities 3 4 5 6 7
Let´s now see what shifts the W12 values obtained for f3D2 <-> V,v´=8 interaction will correspond to agust,heima,...january09/Term values for triplet paper-030309kmak.xls • i.e. from D(DE) should be about 3.86 ~ 4 • From above it looks as is the absolut maximum deviations of DE´s (i.e. D(DE)´s) are • Something like: • D(DE) • f3D2: 0.5 • f3D1 1 • g3S+(1) 2 • If i try using D(DE) = 0.5 I obtain: • Now I go back to and calculate corresponding W12´: agust,heima,...january09/Term values for triplet paper-030309kmak.xls agust,heima,...january09/f3D2&Vv8-020309ak:
Exp. I(35Cl+)/I(H35Cl+) Calc. J´ Now let´s make a model including the Gateway mechanism.
Ry1 Ry0 V t3S
Compaired to before