1 / 9

Performance Evaluation of Ad-hoc Routing Protocols using a Testbed

This project aims to evaluate the performance of ad-hoc routing protocols using a testbed, comparing table-driven and on-demand protocols and IPv4-based and IPv6-based protocols. The methodology includes measuring packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, scalability, and path optimality. The expected results and deliverables include insights into the protocols' performance and a term project report.

rrodney
Download Presentation

Performance Evaluation of Ad-hoc Routing Protocols using a Testbed

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CS492 Term Project 이두영

  2. Contents • Motivation • Goal & Scope • Methodology • Expected Results & Deliverable • Conclude • Reference

  3. Motivation • Testbed를 통한 measurements • 각각의 ad-hoc routing protocol 성능 평가 • 시뮬레이션 결과와 실험결과 분석 • 차이점/문제점 파악 및 개선점 확인 • 통계적 접근 모델 확인

  4. Goal & Scope • Ad-hoc 라우팅 프로토콜의 성능 평가 • Table-driven vs On-demand • Table-driven(Proactive) • OLSR, TBRFE, etc. • On-demand(Reactive) • AODV, TORA, DSR, etc. • IPv4-based vs IPv6-based • Linux-based vs Widows-based

  5. Technical problem • Testing computer configuration • To make scenario choreography • Adding a new routing protocol

  6. Methodology • Packet delivery ratio • Application layer packets originated at source to received packets • Characterizes completeness and correctness of the routing protocol • Routing overhead • Total # of packets sent during transmission • Scalability • Path optimality • Difference between number of hops a packet took and the shortest path measured • Measures the ability to efficiently use network resources

  7. Expected Result & Deliverable • Proactive routing protocol performs predictably, not good when mobility increases • DSR was good at all speeds and rates • AODV does almost as good, but more overhead makes it more expensive then DSR • Collected data through various Test • Measurement results • Demo • Term project report

  8. Schedule • Routing Protocols Study • Testing 환경 설정 : ~ 11.12 (1 week) • Testing : ~ 11.26 (2 weeks)

  9. Reference • APE • http://apetestbed.sourceforge.net • Paper • A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols (MobiCom ’98)

More Related