1 / 4

RBridge Architecture Status Update: Editorial Changes and IS-IS Integration

This update includes editorial changes based on feedback, alignment with the protocol specification, and reorganization to improve readability. It reflects current issues, consensus, and RBridge operations. The document is now more acceptable for IEEE reviewers and accessible to readers.

rtweed
Download Presentation

RBridge Architecture Status Update: Editorial Changes and IS-IS Integration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RBridge Architecture Status Update Eric Gray, Ericsson

  2. Summary of Changes • Mostly editorial, some minor, some not so minor • Modified to reflect use of IS-IS as assumed • Added figure from Protocol Design Team (Section 3) • Removed a lot of detailed text based on feedback • Added clarifications to section 4 • align with protocol specification • reflect current issues/resolutions and consensus • improve flow of the text after • removal of many details • terminology changes • Separated/reorganized section 4 and 5 • Section 5 is more of a RBridge operation tutorial • Minor editing cleanup to abstract, introduction, other places

  3. Next • In spite of removal of detailed text, re-alignment with the protocol specification and reorganization, the total changes were • relatively few, • consisted of • no fundamental architectural changes • very few substantive text changes • Now believe the document should be • much more acceptable to IEEE reviewers • more accessible to readers • ready for WG last call?

More Related