310 likes | 326 Views
Explore the concept of the tipping point and its relevance to our society today. Find out if our society has reached its tipping point in terms of social behavior and policies. Discover the challenges and evidence that indicate we are moving in the right direction.
E N D
THE TIPPING POINT: Are We There Yet? june 2019
What is a Tipping Point? “The tipping point is that magic moment when an idea, trend, or social behavior crosses a threshold, tips, and spreads like wildfire…” • Author Malcolm Gladwell • “The Tipping Point”
Where is our Tipping Point? • It is not a location on a map • There are no directions, formula, recipe to “discover” it • In fact, it has never been seen
Or does it look like this? • There are no public websites listing people convicted of a sex offense • No one required to wear GPS device • Everyone able to access computers • Social media available to all
Or does it look like this? (cont’d) • Registrants have a safe place to live • No “compliance checks” • Registrants can be active members of their family • Attend family gatherings • Participate in school activities
Or does it look like this? (cont’d) • Registrants have good jobs • Paid according to skills, experience • Without fear of retaliation • From public • From co-workers • Registrants can join the military
Or does it look like this? (cont’d) • Registrants may lawfully visit public places • Libraries and museums • Beaches and parks • Movie theaters and bowling alleys • Fast-food restaurants
Or does it look like this? (cont’d) • Reparations paid to all registrants • Extra funding for those with “sex offender” on driver’s license • Children and spouses of registrants provided free college education or vocational training
Where are we today? • State registries continue to grow • More than 900,000 individuals • Broad scope includes those convicted of non-violent, non-contact offenses - yet all treated equally • Many registrants unemployed, homeless • Some registrants targeted by vigilantes • Registry affects family members, too!
How do we find the Tipping Point? • Education • Families and friends • Public, elected officials, policy makers
How do we find the Tipping Point? • Legislation • Oppose bills that harm • Letters, phone calls, emails • Participate in hearings • Support bills that help
How do we find the Tipping Point? • Litigation • Challenge existing laws • Identify “low hanging fruit” • Establish credibility • Move up the tree to “higher fruit” • Most cases settle
What’s in our way? • U S Supreme Court – Smith v. Doe - 2003 • Registration is administrative requirement, not punishment – like application for Price Club • Annual registration by mail • No presence or residency restrictions • No affirmative disability or restraint • Notification system “passive” • Doesn’t resemble shaming
What’s in our way? (cont’d) • Based upon myth re: re-offense • “Frightening and high” – up to 80 percent • Based on Psychology Today article • Ex Post Facto clause does not apply • New laws can be applied retroactively! • Every level of government (federal, state, local) - residency restrictions, presence restrictions
How do we know we will get there? • U S Supreme Court – Plessy v. Ferguson – 1896 • Separate but equal education acceptable • U S Supreme Court – Brown v. Board of Education – 1954 • Separate but Equal unconstitutional • De Jure Discrimination
Evidence that we are on our way • Michigan laws unconstitutional • 6th Circuit Court of Appeals - Does v. Snyder – Aug. 2016, cert. denied. • Laws violate federal, state ex post facto clauses • Presence and residency restrictions • Smith v. Doe did not give states “blank check” • Burden “substantial”, not minor or indirect
More evidence - Federal • Failure to register • U.S. v. Nichols – April 2016 • Registrant not required to notify state of move to another country • Access to social media • Packingham v. North Carolina – Feb 2017 • Government cannot deny registrants access to social media (but private sector can)
More evidence - Federal • Failure to register • U.S. v. Gundy – 2015 – 2nd Circuit • SORNA requirement and delegation to states • Retroactive application • Gundy v. U.S. – 2018 – U.S. Supreme Court • Oral argument – Oct. 2018 • Friends of the court – many briefs including academics and ACLU
More evidence – States • Library Ban Unconstitutional • 10th Circuit Court of Appeals – Jan 2012 – Doe v. City of Albuquerque • First Amendment rights • Lifetime Registration for Juveniles Unconstitutional • Ohio Supreme Court – Apr 2012 – In re C.P. • “Cruel and unusual punishment”
More evidence - States • Pennsylvania v. Muniz - July 2017 • Defendant convicted prior to effective date of SORNA • SORNA registration requirement applied retroactively • Legislature declared focused upon recidivism rates • Court found SORNA punitive • Lack of fair notice • Disadvantages offender • Decision based upon ex post facto clauses • Distinguishes facts of Smith v. Doe
More evidence - Federal • Millard v. Rankin – Colorado – Aug. 2017 • Decision based on 8th and 14th Amendments • Cruel and unusual punishment • Substantive and procedural due process • Addresses, distinguishes Smith v. Doe • SORNA’s effects “plainly negative” • Exposes registrants to private punishment • Fear generates cruel reactions • Shaming and banishment • On appeal to 10th Circuit Court of Appeals
More evidence - States • Doe v. Sex Offender Board – Mass. – 2018 • Decision based on 14th Amendment • Procedural due process – termination, reclassification • Timely hearing required • Right to legal representation • Significant interests at stake – liberty & privacy • Government needs to avoid erroneous classification • Distracts public attention • Strains law enforcement resources
More evidence - States • North Carolina v. Griffin – North Carolina – 2018 • Decision based upon 4th Amendment • Defendant required to wear GPS for 30 years • GPS requirement is “unreasonable search” • Court shifted burden of proof to state government • State failed to provide evidence that GPS “serves purpose of protecting against recidivism by sex offenders”
More evidence - States • In the matter of Registrants G.H., G.A. • New Jersey - 2018 • Decision based on legislative intent • Retroactive application of requirement to register for life • “Manifestly unfair” • Originally eligible to petition removal • Plaintiffs no longer pose threat to safety of others
Conclusion “I am only one, but I am one. I can’t do everything, but I can do something. What I can do, I ought to do. And what I ought to do, By the Grace of God I will do.” -- Author Eric Butterworth “Spiritual Economics”
Closing • “Show Up – Stand Up – Speak Up” -- Civil Rights Attorney Janice Bellucci