240 likes | 333 Views
Chicago One N Franklin. October 27,2006. Energy Management and Conservation Across a Nationwide Portfolio of Office Buildings. Paul Saccone Vice President – Engineering and Energy Operations. EOP National Platform. Square Feet in Millions. Seattle 9.6. Bo ston 11.9. Portland 3.9.
E N D
Chicago One N Franklin
October 27,2006 Energy Management and Conservation Across a Nationwide Portfolio of Office Buildings Paul Saccone Vice President – Engineering and Energy Operations
EOP National Platform Square Feet in Millions Seattle9.6 Boston11.9 Portland3.9 Stamford1.7 New York6.3 Sacramento2.7 Wash D.C. 6.6 Chicago12.0 Oakland2.6 San Fran10.0 Denver4.0 San Jose5.9 Los Angeles8.4 Atlanta5.3 Orange County5.7 San Diego2.2 Updated as of 10-06-06. Austin3.4 109.6 Million Square Feet As of 10-3-06.
ENERGY REPRESENTS THE SINGLE LARGEST PURCHASED GOOD FOR EQUITY OFFICE 5
Six Focus Areas of Energy Strategy Energy Conservation Energy Procurement Education / Training Energy Monitoring Energy Investment Distributed Generation
Energy Conservation • Established Best Practices database (BP) by system and geographical location • Developed training and measurement parameters to reduce utility consumption without spending capital • Set and enumerated goals (4.5% total savings in 2004 and 2005) • Change mindsets
Energy Investments • Evaluate energy investment projects • Analyze projects for energy cost savings and return • Create performance measurement parameters • Implement projects to reduce utility operating costs
Analysis Program Flowchart BUILDING DESCRIPTION Peak & Hourly Loads LOAD PHASE • Location • Zones • Design Data • By Zones CFM & Supply Air Dry Bulb SYSTEMS DESCRIPTIONS DESIGN PHASE • By Zone WEATHER • System Types • System Details Equipment Loads SYSTEMSIMULATION PHASE • By System • By Hour EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS Energy Consumption EQUIPMENTSIMULATION PHASE • Equipment Types • Equipment Info • By Source ECONOMIC DATA EconomicComparisonsof Alternatives • Mortgage Life • Economic Factors • First Cost • Maintenance Cost EQUIPMENTPERFORMANCE ECONOMICANALYSIS PHASE 11
Two Year Cost vs. Annual Energy Savings Dollars in Millions $
Pollution Power Plant (Remote from Thermal Users) Conventional Thermal Generation 70% Waste Heat Fuel 100% 30% Electricity
Pollution CHP Plants (On Site) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) 34% Waste Heat Electricity Fuel 100% 66% Steam Chilled Water
Energy Monitoring Perform Rate Analysis Energy & Expense Profiles MonitorDistributedGenerators Utility Bill Analysis & Validation ITRON – EMS PerformanceMetrics Weather / Occupancy Compensation Energy Alarms
Positive Energy & Environmental Impact Impact Program Actions 4.5% 3.6% 2.4% 4.5% 15.0% Continue BDP application Continue Investing in efficiency Conservation program Investment Program Energy monitoring Distributed generation Total benefit Refine ITRON monitoringand verification system Continue to improve Cogenoperations 20
What Can You Do? • Create effective and realistic energy efficiency building codes • Provide direct and indirect (through the utilities) energy efficiency incentives • Lobby for competitive access that will promote energy efficiency in the generation sector • Lobby for and require fair interconnection standards and rate structures that will promote CHP and the associated energy and environmental benefits
Q & A 22
Chicago One N Franklin