120 likes | 254 Views
Current Affairs Debate Exhibition Workshop. Motion. This house believes that it should be a criminal offence for individuals who work in public services to go on strike. . 3 v 3, 5 minutes. First Proposition. First Opposition. Second Proposition. Second Opposition. Third Proposition.
E N D
Motion This house believes that it should be a criminal offence for individuals who work in public services to go on strike.
3 v 3, 5 minutes First Proposition First Opposition Second Proposition Second Opposition Third Proposition Third Opposition Fourth Opposition Fourth Proposition
First proposition speaker • Definitions • Case stance • Policy • Case division • Argument 1 (PEEL Structure) • Argument 2 (PEEL Structure)
First opposition speaker • Definitions • Case stance • Policy • Case division • Argument 1 (PEEL Structure) • Argument 2(PEEL Structure)
Second proposition speaker • Rebuttals • Definitions • Substantive Arguments • Defend first speaker’s argument, while taking down opponent’s arguments • Argument
Second opposition speaker • Rebuttals • Definitions • Substantive Arguments • Defend first speaker’s argument, while taking down opponent’s arguments • Argument
Third proposition speaker • Summarize debate into 1-3 key issues • Develop team’s arguments to greatest degree of clarity • Conclusively refute opponent’s case
Third opposition speaker • Summarize debate into 1-3 key issues • Develop team’s arguments to greatest degree of clarity • Conclusively refute opponent’s case
Fourth opposition speaker • May add a final point for the team’s case • Attempts to rebut the proposition’s case • Refutes assertions and examples • Backs up the opposition’s main hits on the proposition • Aims to highlight the ineffectiveness of the proposition to deal with the opposition’s arguments • Summarise the merits of the team’s case and the shortcomings of the proposition.
Fourth proposition speaker • May add one final point for the team’s case • Attempts to rebut the opposition’s case • Refutes assertions and examples • Backs up the proposition’s main hits on the opposition • Aims to highlight the ineffectiveness of the opposition • Summarises the merits of the team’s case and the shortcomings of the opposition.