1 / 101

management of vestibular disorders

management of vestibular disorders Herman Kingma, d epartment of ORL, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht Research Institute Mental Health and Neuroscience

rufina
Download Presentation

management of vestibular disorders

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. management of vestibular disorders Herman Kingma, department of ORL, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht Research Institute Mental Health and Neuroscience Faculty of Biomedical Technology, Technical University Eindhoven

  2. problems in management of dizziness • complex history • which complaints relate to vestibular deficits ? • - vestibular tests • low sensitivity - low specificity: new tests? • - vestibular diseases • pathophysiological mechanisms: new insights? • - therapy • causal versus symptomatic • medication: indication area ? mode of action ? • ablation • labyrinthine substitution systems - vestibular implants

  3. which complaints are related to vestibular deficits ? • VERTIGO ?

  4. acute but transient symptoms • acute unilateral loss or fluctuating function (neuritis, Ménière…) • - acute severe vertigo, severe nausea, falling and imbalance • (the classical leading symptoms for diagnosis) • acute bilateral loss • acute severe intolerance to head movements, nausea and • imbalance (no vertigo: so the diagnosis is often missed)

  5. remaining peripheral vestibular function loss • with: • - reduced automatisation of balance • reduced dynamic visual acuity • reduced perception of self motion • hypersensitivity for optokinetic stimuli • enhanced neuro-vegetative sensitivity • secondary: fear and fatigue

  6. somatosensory e.g. foot sole pressure gravitoreceptors blood pressure sensors in large blood vessels vision CNS interpretation learning adaptation compensation labyrinths hearing autonomic processes fast blood pressure regulation heart beat frequency nausea / vomiting image stabilisation spatial orientation balance control

  7. complaints related to vestibular dysfunction • acute loss or fluctuating function • transient: vertigo, nausea, falling / imbalance • remaining peripheral vestibular function loss • sustained: • - enhanced neuro-vegetative sensitivity

  8. somatosensory e.g. foot sole pressure gravitoreceptors blood pressure sensors in large blood vessels vision CNS interpretation learning adaptation compensation labyrinths hearing autonomic processes fast blood pressure regulation heart beat frequency nausea / vomiting image stabilisation spatial orientation balance control

  9. complaints related to vestibular dysfunction • acute loss or fluctuating function • transient: vertigo, nausea, falling / imbalance • remaining peripheral vestibular function loss • sustained: • - enhanced neuro-vegetative sensitivity • reduced ability to discriminate between • self-motion and environmental motion

  10. vestibular impact • upon postural control • regulation of muscle tone • relative to gravity • regulation of COM • relative to base of support • balancing • correction steps • - labyrinths important for • balance at low speed • learning motor activities • → automatisation Centre Of Mass base of support

  11. visual cortex cer hippocampus basal ganglia spinal pattern generator vn

  12. otolith function especially relevant for: motor learning (retardation in congenital areflexia) maintaining complex postures standing or slow walking on a soft surface (wind-surfing) in darkness in presence of misleading visual stimuli labyrinths less relevant for: walking at normal speed or running (visual anticipation) bilateral areflexia leads to degeneration of “head direction” and head “place” cells in the hippocampus

  13. patient with severe bilateral vestibular hyporeflexia slow tandem walk fast tandem walk

  14. complaints related to vestibular dysfunction • acute loss or fluctuating function • transient: vertigo, nausea, falling / imbalance • remaining peripheral vestibular function loss • sustained: • - enhanced neuro-vegetative sensitivity • - reduced ability to discriminate between • self-motion and environmental motion • reduced automatisation of balance

  15. somatosensory e.g. foot sole pressure gravitoreceptors blood pressure sensors in large blood vessels vision CNS interpretation learning adaptation compensation labyrinths hearing autonomic processes fast blood pressure regulation heart beat frequency nausea / vomiting image stabilisation spatial orientation balance control

  16. cortex c mes cer cgl thal pons omn vn VOR: 8 msec OKR and Smooth pursuit: >75 msec

  17. head impulse test in unilateral loss standard video (50 Hz)

  18. the Germanexperience loss of gaze stabilisation (towards bad-side) especially for fast head movements

  19. VOR 3D: nystagmus 3D • direction = fast phase • magnitude = slow phase • horizontal (left – right) • vertical (up – down) • torsional (in- and extorsion)

  20. in-torsion ex-torsion up nose down left right

  21. simulation of oscillopsia  reduced dynamic visual acuity in case of bilateral vestibular areflexia

  22. Dynamic Visual Acuity (VA) measurement treadmill: 2, 4 and 6 km/h

  23. decrease of VA during walking normalvalues

  24. which complaints are related to vestibular deficits ?

  25. acute but transient symptoms • acute unilateral loss or fluctuating function (neuritis, Ménière…) • - acute severe vertigo, severe nausea, falling and imbalance • (the classical leading symptoms for diagnosis) • acute bilateral loss • acute severe intolerance to head movements, nausea and • imbalance (no vertigo: so the diagnosis is often missed)

  26. remaining peripheral vestibular function loss • with: • - reduced automatisation of balance • reduced dynamic visual acuity • reduced perception of self motion • hypersensitivity for optokinetic stimuli • enhanced neuro-vegetative sensitivity • secondary: fear and fatigue

  27. a vestibular function loss implies • permanent impairment • analogue to hearing and visual losses examples - Meniere’s disease when attacks are absent or disappeared - neuritis vestibularis after central compensation - bilateral vestibulopathy after central compensation - vestibular loss schwannoma (also after extirpation)

  28. many vestibular syndromes where vertigo is the leading symptom • Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo and Nystagmus • vestibular neuritis or labyrinthitis / peripheral vestibular ischemia • pseudo vestibular neuritis: vestibular TIA or infarction • motion sickness / mal de debarquement • Meniere’s disease (MD) • recurrent vestibulopathy (vestibular Meniere? no early stage of MD ? • vestibular migraine (benign paroxysmal vertigo of childhood?) • vestibular paroxysms (neuro-vascular compression vestibular nerve, • analogon trigeminus neuralgia) • vestibular epilepsia • fistula / superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) • - central vestibular vertigo

  29. labyrinth canals: rotations statoliths: translations + tilt clinical relevant knowledge of function and compensation of peripheral lesions

  30. AC PC HC sacculus utriculus labyrinth type of movements rotations canals HC+PC+AC translations + tilt statoliths: utriculus + sacculus speed of movements frequencydependence

  31. frequency dependence semicircular canals ?

  32. frequency dependence canals: gain 0.1 Hz 10 Hz sensitivity frequency (Hz) calorics chair head impulses

  33. ageing (>60) frequency dependence canals presbyo-vertigo general population sensitivity elderly > 65 yo 0.01 Hz 0.1 Hz 10 Hz frequency (Hz)

  34. AC PC HC sacculus utriculus labyrinth type of movements rotations canals HC+PC+AC translations + tilt statoliths: utriculus + sacculus speed of movements frequencydependence

  35. statoliths statoconia supporting cells haircells nerve • labyrinth • rotations: canal system • translations + tilt: statolith systems • utriculus + sacculus • accelerometers • function based on inertia of statoconia mass • multi-directional symmetrical sensitivity • frequency dependence

  36. velocity constant velocity deceleration acceleration 0 Fg Fg no discrimination between translation and tilt possible

  37. frequency dependence semicircular statolith systems ?

  38. sensitivity statolith 0.2 Hz 2 Hz 20 Hz frequency (Hz)

  39. sensitivity statolith 0.2 Hz 2 Hz 20 Hz frequency (Hz) tilt or translation

  40. sensitivity canals statolith 0.2 Hz 2 Hz 20 Hz frequency (Hz) correct tilt or translation

  41. sensitivity canals vision and/or propriocepsis statolith 0.2 Hz 2 Hz 20 Hz frequency (Hz) correct tilt or translation

  42. some nasty facts and findings that need to be explained • - divers under water can’t orient themselves without vision ! • submersion in water: • principle of inertia of mass in labyrinth remains • → normal detection of accelerations should be possible • no detection of orientation when covered by an avalanche • conclusion: statolith input needs to be confirmed by • other senses, otherwise it will be neglected

  43. which complaints are related to natural limitations ? motion sickness !

  44. no pathology: motion sickness = natural limitation + neuro-vegetative sensitivity multi-sensory reference stored in the brain based on learning for fast detection of spatial orientation multi-sensory input: no movement detection of gravity vector no problem comparison detection: no movement

  45. self motion stationary reference voluntary self motion • voluntary control • feed back • anticipation • detection of gravity vector no problem fast detection

  46. boat = passive motion stationary reference boat movement • passive movement • only feed back • impact upon motor control • anticipation ? • detection of gravity vector • can be a problem fast detection requires learning

  47. inadequate stationary reference boat + self motion • passive movement • only feed back • gravity vector ? learned motor patterns do not apply anymore before learning problem with selection of right reference for motor activity: motion sickness built up of new reference and motor learning anticipation boat + self motion after learning fast identification, more automatic but not easy for everybody

More Related