430 likes | 549 Views
Nuclear Power – fact and fiction. Many genuine concerns. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/waste/doc/2005_06_nuclear_waste_en.pdf. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_297_en.pdf. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_297_en.pdf. Objections in Ireland.
E N D
http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/waste/doc/2005_06_nuclear_waste_en.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/waste/doc/2005_06_nuclear_waste_en.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_297_en.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_297_en.pdf
Objections in Ireland It’s not safe No solution for waste Doesn’t help emissions Use in nuclear weapons Risk of terrorism Fuel will run out They’re too big They’re too expensive Use renewables instead
Fact or Fiction? “We are not going nuclear because we are going down the renewables route.“ Minister for Energy (Eamon Ryan), Late Debate, RTE radio
Joint Committee on Climate Change and Energy SecurityCER submission “… gasand wind generation must be supplemented by other sources, whether coal with carbon capture and storage, nuclear or non-intermittent renewables.”
EirGrid “concerns that the portfolio … dominated by wind … supported by gas ... exposes Ireland to risks both in terms of supply and price volatility.”
Airtricity “a sustainable electricity system is the sum of a portfolio of interdependent technological solutions including renewables” “Should competitive, flexible, smaller scale reactors be proven, then this is an option that Ireland should consider in the longer term.”
Capacity Credit of Wind http://www.eirgrid.com/media/Generation%20Adequacy%20Report%202010-2016.pdf
Realistic contribution of some renewables - global Maximum additional (thermal equivalent) amounts: Wind x 50 Hydro x 2 Biomass x 3 Geothermal x 70 Marine x 500
Realistic contribution of some renewables - global Maximum additional (thermal equivalent) amounts: Wind x 50 (~ 3 TW) Hydro x 2 (~ 1 TW) Biomass x 3 (~ 1 TW) total < 6 TW Geothermal x 70 (~ 100 GW) (need 15 TW) Marine x 500 (~ 100 GW) Remainder from solar, fission, fusion and new technology
Objections in Ireland It’s not safe No solution for waste Doesn’t help emissions Use in nuclear weapons Risk of terrorism Fuel will run out They’re too big They’re too expensive Use renewables instead ……….. Fiction
Fact or Fiction? “Any reasonable cost-benefit analysis concludes that nuclear energy has no future“ Oisin Coghlan, Friends of the Earth OR “..our electricity is more expensive … because they have nuclear energy, which is cheaper.” Mary Coughlan, Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment
SEI shows nuclear cheaper than wind http://www.seai.ie/Publications/Low_Carbon_Opportunity_Study/Technical_Appendix.pdf
DIT/BERR: nuclear cheapest new option http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/tna/+/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files /file31938.pdf
Objections in Ireland It’s not safe No solution for waste Doesn’t help emissions Use in nuclear weapons Risk of terrorism Fuel will run out They’re too big They’re too expensive ….……….. Fiction Use renewables instead ……….. Fiction
Fact or Fiction? “Too big for the Irish Grid” “Plant size is 1600 MW”
New nuclear plants by 2015-20 • Toshiba 4S 10 MW • Hyperion 25 MW • PBMR 165 MW • Babcock & Wilcox SMR 185 MW • Westinghouse SMR 225 MW 10 new plants <= 700 MW will begin operation by 2012 Opportunity, not a threat!
Objections in Ireland It’s not safe No solution for waste Doesn’t help emissions Use in nuclear weapons Risk of terrorism Fuel will run out They’re too big …………………...... Fiction They’re too expensive ….……….. Fiction Use renewables instead ……….. Fiction
Not enough fuel? Known Recoverable Resources of Uranium 2009 @ US$130 /kgU > 70 years at 70,000 tU p.a.
Objections in Ireland It’s not safe No solution for waste Doesn’t help emissions Use in nuclear weapons Risk of terrorism Fuel will run out ……………………. Fiction They’re too big …………………...... Fiction They’re too expensive ….……….. Fiction Use renewables instead ……….. Fiction
Target for terrorists? Segregated + protected + shielded Jet crash test Small target Underground Auto SCRAM Easier targets (chemical, biological) No history https://share.sandia.gov/news/resources/video-gallery/index.html#rocketsled
Objections in Ireland It’s not safe No solution for waste Doesn’t help emissions Use in nuclear weapons Risk of terrorism ……….............. Fiction Fuel will run out ……………………. Fiction They’re too big …………………...... Fiction They’re too expensive ….……….. Fiction Use renewables instead ……….. Fiction
Use in weapon? • Fuel: Low Enriched Uranium (< 5%) • Weapon: Highly Enriched Uranium (>20%) • State-run enrichment facilities • Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty • IFNEC (GNEP)? • Cannot operate as a nuclear weapon
Objections in Ireland It’s not safe No solution for waste Doesn’t help emissions Use in nuclear weapons ………… Fiction Risk of terrorism ……….............. Fiction Fuel will run out ……………………. Fiction They’re too big …………………...... Fiction They’re too expensive ….……….. Fiction Use renewables instead ……….. Fiction
Fact or fiction? “nuclear energy is just as polluting in terms of carbon emissions as gas-fired power.” Oisin Coghlan, Friends of the Earth
IPCC are unequivocal… Figure 4.19 in Climate Change 2007: Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change
Future Irish emissions http://www.eirgrid.com/media/Low%20Carbon%20Generation%20Options%20for%20the%20All%20Island%20Market%20%282%29.pdf (POYRY)
Objections in Ireland It’s not safe No solution for waste Doesn’t help emissions …………. Fiction Use in nuclear weapons ………… Fiction Risk of terrorism ……….............. Fiction Fuel will run out ……………………. Fiction They’re too big …………………...... Fiction They’re too expensive ….……….. Fiction Use renewables instead ……….. Fiction
“Waste remains dangerous for hundreds of thousands of years” – fact or fiction? "What is remarkable about nuclear waste is that it fades away. In 600 years the high-level waste from a nuclear power station is no more radioactive or dangerous than the uranium ore from which it originated.”James Lovelock
Waste issues Small quantities (500 m3 HLW vs 1 bn m3 ind pa) Retained 50-year waiting period Long life = low radioactivity Geological storage (Finland, Sweden, UK, Switzerland) Natural reactors (Oklo, 3 billion years ago) Valuable resource - use as fuel?
Objections in Ireland It’s not safe No solution for waste ………….... Fiction Doesn’t help emissions …………. Fiction Use in nuclear weapons ………… Fiction Risk of terrorism ……….............. Fiction Fuel will run out ……………………. Fiction They’re too big …………………...... Fiction They’re too expensive ….……….. Fiction Use renewables instead ……….. Fiction
U.S. Industrial Safety Accident Rate2007 ISAR = Number of accidents resulting in lost work, restricted work, or fatalities per 200,000 worker hours. Electric utilities and manufacturing do not include fatality data. Sources: Nuclear (World Association of Nuclear Operators), 2006 Data for Electric Utilities and Manufacturing (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). Updated: 4/08
U.S. Nuclear Industrial Safety Accident Rate One-Year Industry Values ISAR = Number of accidents resulting in lost work, restricted work, or fatalities per 200,000 worker hours. Note: Starting in 2008, data includes supplemental personnel. Source: World Association of Nuclear Operators Updated: 4/11
Objections in Ireland It’s not safe ………….................... Fiction No solution for waste ………….... Fiction Doesn’t help emissions …………. Fiction Use in nuclear weapons ………… Fiction Risk of terrorism ……….............. Fiction Fuel will run out ……………………. Fiction They’re too big …………………...... Fiction They’re too expensive ….……….. Fiction Use renewables instead ……….. Fiction
Summary • Whirlwind guide • Many fallacies circulating • Efficiency paramount • Serious topic, serious consideration • Going gets tough….facts, not fiction!