1 / 13

ReBoRK : A Review-based Book Recommender for K-12 Readers

ReBoRK : A Review-based Book Recommender for K-12 Readers. Sole Pera CS 652-2012. Introduction. Existing book recommenders Make suggestions that match readers’ interests Problems:. One-size-fits-all. Required personal historical data may not always be available.

rufina
Download Presentation

ReBoRK : A Review-based Book Recommender for K-12 Readers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ReBoRK:A Review-based Book Recommender for K-12 Readers Sole Pera CS 652-2012

  2. Introduction • Existing book recommenders • Make suggestions that match readers’ interests • Problems: One-size-fits-all Required personal historical data may not always be available Not personalized enough Existing Recommenders Suggest books without considering the reading ability of its users

  3. Proposed Solution • ReBoRK • Review-based book recommender that generates personalized suggestions recommendations tailored towardsK-12students ? ? ? Grade Level Similarity Metadata Similarity Feature/ Opinion Similarity Item-Item Similarity ReBoRK

  4. Information Extraction Extraction Module • Anaphora Resolution • Use Guitar system to replace all discourse referents by their corresponding entities the reviews • Review Summarization • Use [Pera et al, WISE `11] and SentiWordNet to retain the portions of the reviews that express sentiment • Linguistic and Syntactic Analysis • Use Stanford's NLP tools • Part-Of-Speech tagging • Dependency parsing

  5. Information Extraction Extraction Module • Information Extraction Rules • Based on improvements upon the IE rules proposed in [Kamal et al., WIMS `12] • Identify features on reviews • Identify opinions on reviews • Identify relationships between features and opinions • Example “It is written in simplerhyming patterns and illustrated with adorablepictures!” Review for “Bear's New Friend” by Karma Wilson, extracted from Amazon.com

  6. Readability Recommendation Module User profile Averaged Grade Level ? Matched Reading Level Grade Level Potential recommendations

  7. Feature-Opinion Similarity Recommendation Module User profile Feature-Opinion Distribution ? Matched Preferences Feature-Opinion Distribution Potential recommendation

  8. Item-Item Similarity Recommendation Module User profile < …, , , , , , …> ? Matched Bookmarking Patterns <…, , , , , , …> Potential recommendation

  9. Content Similarity Recommendation Module User profile Metadata: titles + descriptions ? Matched Content Metadata: title + description Potential recommendation

  10. Ranking Recommendation Module Readability Item-Item Metadata Fusion Strategies Feature/ Opinion Top-10 Recommendations

  11. Proposed Validation Extraction Module • Dataset • Metrics • Precision • Recall • F-Measure

  12. Proposed Validation Recommendation Module • Datasets • Validation Strategy • N-fold cross-validation • Metrics • Precision@K • Mean Reciprocal Rank • Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG)

  13. Questions

More Related