90 likes | 102 Views
Applicability of Existing Solutions to the Problem Space. draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-03.txt. Outline. Purpose of draft expose areas for further work convert to an applicability statement as solutions are completed Basic mode solutions exposure of existing solution for base mode
E N D
Applicability of Existing Solutions to the Problem Space draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-03.txt
Outline • Purpose of draft • expose areas for further work • convert to an applicability statement as solutions are completed • Basic mode solutions • exposure of existing solution for base mode • list of missing functions/capabilities • Open discussion on applicability to the Basic mode
Scope • Shows the applicability of existing GMPLS protocols and mechanisms to L1VPNs • Identifies several areas where additional protocol extensions or modifications are needed to meet the L1VPN service requirements set • applicability of GMPLS protocols and mechanisms for base and extended mode • along with additional work areas needed to fully support the requirements for each model.
Base Mode • No routing exchange between the CE and the PE • Note: routing operates within the provider network and may be used by PEs to exchange information specific to the VPNs supported by the provider network • LSP setup, deletion, etc. by RFC 3473 signaling between the CE and the PE, and then across the provider network
Requirements and Coverage • Signaling: CE-CE LSP setup, deletion, modification: • Shuffling [GVPN]: • information carried in RSVP-TE messages identifying a LSP (i.e. SESSION and SENDER_TEMPLATE objects) is translated by the ingress and egress PE. • single end-to-end session (i.e., CE-CE), but the identifiers of that session change along the path of the LSP. • Stitching (see [Stitching]) • properties of the PE-PE LSP segment are such that exactly one end-to-end LSP can be stitched to the LSP segment i.e., the PE-PE LSP and the CE-CE LSP correspond exactly one to one. • there are two sessions (i.e., CE-CE and PE-PE). • Note: Both can be used in combination with LSP nesting [GMPLS-UNI][LSP HIER]
Requirements and Coverage • VPN membership information exchange • [GVPN] covers VPN membership information exchange by BGP running on the PEs. • Other possibility is to use IGP based VPN membership information exchange • CE-PE TE link information exchange within the provider network • [GVPN] describes potential use of BGP for exchanging CE-PE TE link information. Detailed protocol specifications are needed as additional work. • Other possibility IGP to advertise CE-PE TE links. Since a CE does not participate in routing exchange with the provider network, TE link information must be properly constructed by the PE advertising full CE-PE TE link information
Open Points (CE-PE) CE functionality 1) Status of established CE-CE LSPs L1VPN connections being GMPLS LSPs, re-use of existing GMPLS control mechanisms to monitor the status of these connections. Provide further details for • PathErr/ResvErr message through CE-PE boundary: IF_ID ERROR_SPEC object TLV • Notify message exchange through CE-PE boundary: • IF_ID ERROR_SPEC object TLV; • Notify Request object processing and routing of the Notify message
Open Points (CE-PE) PE functionality 1) How to process incoming CE's signaling requests and translate them into internal (within network) GMPLS LSP requests: detail operations Side question: stitching and/or shuffling ? 2) How to tell CEs about LSP status Same as for CE functionality
Open Points (PE-PE) • Resource management per VPN (signaling of PE-PE LSP) • Centralized (no protocol extensions) • Distributed (routing extensions e.g resource coloring) • VPN membership information exchange within the provider network • Base mode does not support VPN membership exchange between CE and PE and so such information is assumed to be configured within the provider network (usually on the PEs) • Two existing mechanisms for the functional option of exchanging VPN membership information within the provider network (between PEs) • Detailed analysis of options 1 (BGP) and 2 (IGP) is FFS • CE-PE TE link info. exchange within the provider network • To prevent from LSP setup failure due to lack of resources on remote CE-PE TE links, this information may be optionally propagated within the provider network to be used for path computation. • Detailed analysis of options 1 (BGP) and 2 (IGP) is FFS