1 / 22

Ongoing activities in the Czech Republic Jana Chladná National Coordination Authority

Ongoing activities in the Czech Republic Jana Chladná National Coordination Authority The Ministry for Regional Development 7. May 2010, Budapest. Presentation outline. Structure of NSRF Activities of Evaluation plan of NSRF Periodical monitoring – financial, physical (indicators)

rumor
Download Presentation

Ongoing activities in the Czech Republic Jana Chladná National Coordination Authority

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ongoing activities in the Czech Republic Jana Chladná National Coordination Authority The Ministry for Regional Development 7. May 2010, Budapest 1

  2. Presentation outline • Structure of NSRF • Activities of Evaluation plan of NSRF • Periodical monitoring – financial, physical (indicators) • Concept of evaluating physical progress • Illustration of selected outputs • Conclusion

  3. Czech OPs 2007-2013

  4. Evaluation activities • 2004-2008 • - realized 70 evaluations (in value of 1,3 mil €) • 2009 • - 9 external evaluations were completed (437,5 tis. €) • Presently: created by NCA • - Monthly monitoring of implementation state • - Quarterly analyses fullfiling rules n+2/n+3 • - Physical monitoring

  5. Thematic focus of evaluations and analyses 2004-2008

  6. Evaluation activities • 2004-2008 • - realized 70 evaluations (in value of 1,3 mil €) • 2009 • - 9 external evaluations were completed (437,5 tis. €) • Presently: created by NCA • - Monthly monitoring of implementation state • - Quarterly analyses fullfiling rules n+2/n+3 • - Physical monitoring

  7. The State of Implementation

  8. State of thematic OPs drawing Data source: MSC2007, 6.4.2010

  9. State of regional OPs drawing Data source: MSC2007, 6.4.2010

  10. Physical monitoring

  11. Thematic Evaluations 07-15 11

  12. Sustainable development • Evaluation of int. on environmental impacts • The system of bonification for projects with positive environmental impacts was established • In context of SEA NSRF a list of 21 environmental indicators was created • Evaluation is divided into 3 phases: • - evaluation of the systém - 2010 • - evaluation of short-term results • - final evaluation of positive environmental impacts • Evaluation of int. on equal chances • Purposely targeted projects (ESF) • Projects with positive impacts (other OPs)

  13. Selected Environmental indicators

  14. Sustainable development • Evaluation of int. on environmental impacts • The system of bonification for projects with positive environmental impacts was established • In context of SEA NSRF a list of 21 environmental indicators was created • Evaluation is divided into 3 phases: • - evaluation of the systém - 2010 • - evaluation of short-term results • - final evaluation of positive environmental impacts • Evaluation of int. on equal chances • Purposely targeted projects (ESF) • Projects with positive impacts (other OPs)

  15. Physical monitoring - Indicators • Improvement of physical monitoring • National sourcebook of indicators • Obligatory rules for creation and using indicators • List of aggregation • Technical solution of aggregation • Automatical daily aggregation of indicators from project level has already started for 16 OPs of 17 • Indicators – evaluation of interventions efficiency

  16. Concept of regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations • Recently a concept of possible regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations was set up. • 2 vertical levels • - 1. level of NSRF • - evaluation of fulfilling the objectives of NSRF • - evaluation according to priorite themes • - evaluation according to the geographical location (comparision of NUTS III units) – GIS data base tools • - 2. level of Operational programmes • - Evaluation of physical progress • - individual indicators • - summary evaluation of individual programmes priorite axis

  17. Comparision of funding accordingto priority themes Data source: MSC2007, 31.3.2010

  18. Concept of regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations • Recently a concept of possible regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations was set up. • 2 vertical levels • - 1. level of NSRF • - evaluation of fulfilling the objectives of NSRF • - evaluation according to priorite themes • - evaluation according to the geographical location (comparision of NUTS III units) – GIS data base tools • - 2. level of Operational programmes • - Evaluation of physical progress • - individual indicators • - summary evaluation of individual programmes priorite axis

  19. Comparision of funding accordingto geographical location Data source: MSC2007, 6.4.2010

  20. Concept of regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations • Recently a concept of possible regularly provided on-going analyses/evaluations was set up. • 2 vertical levels • - 1. level of NSRF • - evaluation of fulfilling the objectives of NSRF • - evaluation according to priorite themes • - evaluation according to the geographical location (comparision of NUTS III units) – GIS data base tools • - 2. level of Operational programmes • - Evaluation of physical progress • - individual indicators • - summary evaluation of individual programmes priorite axis

  21. Conclusion • Analyses are used for following objectives: • Identification of risks • - of individual OP objectives underflow • - allocation undraw (unfilling the rule n+2, n+3) • Recommendation for aiming the Proposal Calls to certain activity • Tools for assesment of proposed revisions of OPs • Monitoring • Highly developed in comparision with last programming period • Centralized and determined by obligatory rules • Better quality monitoring data for following evaluations

  22. Thank you for your attention! Contact: Ministry for Regional Development National Coordination Authority jana.chladna@mmr.cz 22

More Related