400 likes | 529 Views
Internet2, Abilene, and GigaPoPs: Una vista de los EE UU. Steve Corbató corbato@internet2.edu Director, Backbone Network Infrastructure University Corp. for Advanced Internet Development. Jornadas Técnicas RedIRIS 2000 Murcia, Espa ña 15 de noviembre, 2000.
E N D
Internet2, Abilene, and GigaPoPs:Una vista de los EE UU Steve Corbató corbato@internet2.edu Director, Backbone Network Infrastructure University Corp. for Advanced Internet Development Jornadas Técnicas RedIRIS 2000 Murcia, España 15 de noviembre, 2000
Advanced U.S. research university connectivity requirements • Research testbed • configurable, breakable, measurable infrastructure • serving computer science research and advanced engineering • traditional province of DARPA • Advanced service/application deployment network • standards based, 7x24 operation expectation (vBNSAbilene) • National education intranet • interconnecting all K-20 educational institutions/networks to enable applications and services unavailable over the commercial Internet • Commercial entities (high performance connectivity) • providers of content of value to EDU (e.g., Nexis-Lexis, Akamai) • EDU-related startups (genomics, IP networking)
Unique features of Internet2 environment • Per capita available bandwidth O(10-100) higher than over the commercial Internet • TCP flows of 0.4 Gbps and higher possible • Active advanced service deployment efforts • Native multicast most widely deployed • Commitment to open network management and active measurement • Emphasis on end-to-end (e2e) performance measurment and assurance • Collaborative relationship with GigaPoPs and research university campus technical communities
Outline • Internet2 project status • Abilene network status • Advanced services • International Transit Network (ITN) • Changes to the Abilene Program • Future infrastructure plans • New technologies • Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative – e2e • Campus networks
Membership update • 179+ universities • 70+ corporations • 40+ affiliated research organizations • 30+ International MoU partners
Internet2 Activities • Applications • Advanced applications with focus on research and education • Middleware • Interoperability across Internet2 institutions • Network Technologies • New network technologies across Internet2 networks • Network Infrastructure • Pre-commercial, production network infrastructure • Partnerships/Tech Transfer • Ensure this technology becomes available beyond Internet2
Applications • Discipline focus • Health Sciences • Arts & Humanities • Support • Portable MPEG2 video conferencing • Portable SGI O2 for other demos • Portable Access Grid Node • Workshops • Survivors of the Shoah/Visual History Foundation: digital media • www.internet2.edu/apps
High Definition Television/IP • Studio grade (200 Mbps UDP/stream) • Collaboration of University of Washington (Research Channel and Pacific/Northwest GigaPoP) and Sony • Raw HDTV/IP (1.5 Gbps) coming soon (Tektronix)…
Middleware • Applications Needs: • Scalable, interoperable authentication and authorization (digital libraries) • Grid computation resources using Globus security, location and allocation of resources, scheduling etc. plugged into campus middleware infrastructures • Common authentication and storage (next generation portals) • www.internet2.edu/middleware
Abilene – November, 2000 • Inflection point in network development • OC-48c (2.5 Gbps) IP-over-SONET backbone • 53 current and pending connections in 32 states • OC-48c connections: Seattle, Atlanta, SC2000 • 175 participants in 47 states and D.C. • Ongoing strong partnership • Cisco, Nortel, Qwest, Indiana Univ., ITECs (NC and OH) • Increasing backbone utilization • Characteristic exponential growth • O(OC-12c) peak utilization on some links • Traffic doubling time: 7 months
Abilene Backbone – autumn 2000 Seattle New York Cleveland Indianapolis Sacramento Washington Denver Denver Kansas City Los Angeles Atlanta Houston
Backbone developments • New router node (#11) in Washington DC • Northern California router node is moving from Sacramento to Sunnvyale • Houston-Atlanta link upgraded to OC-48c • Only one link (Seattle-Sacramento) remains at OC-12c • Increasingly distributed international peering • Peering with CUDI in Los Angeles (CENIC) and soon in El Paso (UTEP) • Abilene International Transit Network (ITN) in production • Collaboration with STARTAP and CA*NET3 • Backbone and connections were unaffected by Qwest’s acquisition of USWEST this summer
OC12 OC3-12 STTL CA*net3, (AARnet) Abilene International Peering APAN/TransPAC, Ca*net3, CERN, CERnet, IUCC, NORDUnet, RENATER, REUNA2, SURFnet, SingAREN, SINET, TAnet2 , (ANSP, HARnet?) NYCM TEN-155*, JANET, NORDUnet, SURFnet CA*net3 (HEAnet) SNVA (SINET, GEMNET) LOSA SingAREN, SINET (HARNET?) AmPATH (REUNA2, RNP2, RETINA?) CALREN2 CUDI UT El Paso (CUDI) * ARNES, BELNET, CESnet, DFN, GRNET, HEAnet, RESTENA, SWITCH, HUNGARNET, GARR-B, POL-34, RCCN, RedIRIS
Abilene International Transit Network • ITN concept developed as some international NRNs moved their U.S. circuit terminations closer to the landing points • By default, Abilene international peers are ITN participants • Non-participating international peers must indicate this intent to UCAID • Abilene ITN service commenced October 23, 2000 • ITN service currently does not extend to U.S. federal research and education networks • ESnet, NISN, NREN, DREN, DARPA Supernet • As an Internet2 backbone, vBNS has become an ITN participant
CA*Net3 CERNET CUDI DFN (via DANTE) IUCC JANET NORDUnet RENATER REUNA2 SINET SingAREN SURFnet TANET2 TransPAC vBNS Current Abilene ITN participants (15)
Abilene ITN implementation • BGP communities for international peers • 11537:2501 – ITN participants • 11537:2500 – non-ITN participants • Abilene ITN participants are tagged with ITN community on ingress (route map: TRANSIT-in) • Abilene ITN participants receive all routes with 11537:2501 community (route map: TRANSIT-out)
ITN collaboration • Abilene, CA*Net3, and STARTAP are actively collaborating on international peering and transit issues in North America • In particular, Abilene and CA*Net3 have agreed to provide transit among their respective ITN participants • Abilene requires a Memorandum of Agreement and an Interconnection Agreement with the foreign NRN directly connected to CA*Net3
Abilene program changes • General end of new OC-3c Abilene backbone connections • Existing and pending OC-3c connections will be unaffected • Revised fee structure for OC-12c and OC-48c connections • Objective is to incent bandwidth upgrades for existing connectors • Overall price reduction is ~15% • Encourage Packet-over-SONET (POS) connections • Expansion to serve the broader educational community
Sponsored Education Group Participation • Effective January 15, 2001, a networked aggregate of educational institutions may gain access to Abilene as a Sponsored Education Group Participant. • designed primarily to accommodate existing and emerging state-based education networks • reflects modified Abilene CoU • This new class of Abilene participation supplements the existing classes of Member Participant, Collaboration Site, and SponsoredParticipant • Applications will be accepted commencing 1/12/2000
Advanced service deployment • Multicast • fully native deployment using current inter-domain protocols • PIM-Sparse, MBGP, MSDP • support for source specific multicast (SSM) in place • IPv6 • overlay testbed in production • Quality of Service (QoS) • QBONE via IETF Differentiated Services protocols • Abilene premium service testing starting • Measurement and Network Management • active probes (Surveyor) deployed in all nodes • open network management stance
Building the Network of the Future – I • Upgrade Abilene to a leading-edge optical transport capability • Transition to OC-192c (10 Gbps) over DWDM backbone • Explore optical interconnection options with international networks (e.g., CA*Net4) & leading GigaPoPs • Establish a rapidly configurable, breakable Internet2 national testbed for the computer science research and the advanced network engineering communities • Interconnection and limited peering with the DARPA Supernet • Overlay networks (server-based) • Option of limited-term dedicated capacity via MPLS tunnels or DWDM λ’s
Network of the Future – II • Continue the vital role of Abilene as a reliable platform for the development of innovative applications and the deployment of advanced services • IP remains the common bearer service • Position Abilene as a critical component of the Internet2 End-to-End (e2e) Initiative – in particular, its vital role within the U.S. research infrastructure • Emphasis on pro-active measurement and open network management • Increasing dependence on Abilene for next generation science
Network of the Future - III • Collaborate with the GigaPoPs on higher bandwidth attachments and the facilitation of international peering • Creative, localized solutions often required above OC-3c • Increasingly distributed set of international landing points and termination options
GigaPoPs • Gigabit-per-second Point of Presence • OC-12 connectivity or greater (GbEth) • Regional aggregation point • high performance (HPNSPs) • commodity (NSPs) • Economies of scale • Member sites • Value added services shared by members • Not limited to research universities • (High-speed) local traffic stays local
MREN (Chicago) CalREN2 (California) SoX (Atlanta/Southeast) Great Plains Network (Kansas City) P/NW Gigapop (Seattle) NYSERNET (New York) MAX (Washington D.C.) NOX (Boston) Front Range (Denver) Leading Regional Gigapops
CalREN-2 Topology Plan (5/98) With thanks to David Wasley
Importance of carrier hotels • Facilities where multiple telecommunications carriers have presences • Orginally exchanged just voice traffic • Often attract other related businesses – ISPs, Web hosting • Westin Bldg (Seattle), One Wilshire (LA), 60 Hudson (NYC) • Very active area of capital investment in the U.S. • Leading GigaPoPs establishing presences • Essential distinguishing factors • Riser capacity • Fiber interconnection room (‘meet-me room’) • Power – production and backup • Ease and speed of construction for tenant buildout • Local exchange point for peering among ISP tenants • Dark fiber from the local campuses is very enabling
Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative • Extending focus from connectivity to performance experienced by end user • e2e will address all obstacles to performance • Application readiness and tuning • End system operating systems and networking support • Local Area Network and campus backbone upgrades • Outreach to end users and campus support teams • Widely distributed, pro-active measurement • Performance Evaluation and Response Teams (PERTs) • Hybrid of Network Operations Center and Applications Support Team • Phased approach • 10-15 campuses and GigaPoPs self-select for first stage • Campus network/applications workshop – UCSD – December, 2000
End-to-End (e2e) PerformanceInitiative • Human to Human Collaboration Experience • Application • Operating system • Host IP stack • Network card • Local Area Network (LAN) • Campus backbone network • Campus connection to regional network/GigaPoP • GigaPoP connection to Internet2 national backbone
Defining E2E Success Metrics • Selecting set of appropriate core applications and services • TCP applications – e.g., Web, file transfer • Internet-based telephony (VoIP) • Internet-based videoconferencing • Multiple technologies with distinct service levels • Pervasive multicast for multimedia and data distribution • Scope • How broadly across the campus network should e2e be supported? • Timing • How quickly can these goals be met? • End user expectation management essential
Summary • Second wave of backbone development concluding • Advanced service deployment proceeding • Utilization growing • Moving to develop next generation backbone and to incent GigaPoP/campus connectivity upgrades • Focusing on assuring e2e performance • www.internet2.edu/abilene
Upcoming Meetings • APAN/Internet2/NLANR/TransPAC • 28-31 January 2001, Hawaii • Internet2 Member Meeting • 7-10 March 2001, Washington, DC