1 / 32

Metacomputing and Solving Einstein s Equations for Black Holes, Neutron Stars, and Gravitational Waves

Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de. This work results from many great collaborations:. AEI-PotsdamG. Allen, B. Brgmann, T. Goodale, J. Mass, T. Radke, W. Benger, many physicists contributing to scientific parts of code...ZIB-BerlinChristian Hege, Andre Merzky, ...RZG-Garc

rusty
Download Presentation

Metacomputing and Solving Einstein s Equations for Black Holes, Neutron Stars, and Gravitational Waves

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Metacomputing and Solving Einstein’s Equations for Black Holes, Neutron Stars, and Gravitational Waves Solving Einstein’s Equations and Impact on Computation Large collaborations essential and difficult! Code becomes the collaborating Tool. Cactus, a new community code for 3D GR-Astrophysics Toolkit for many PDE systems Suite of solvers for Einstein system Metacomputing for the general user: what a scientist really wants and needs Distributed Computing Experiments with Cactus/Globus

    2. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de This work results from many great collaborations: AEI-Potsdam G. Allen, B. Brügmann, T. Goodale, J. Massó, T. Radke, W. Benger, + many physicists contributing to scientific parts of code... ZIB-Berlin Christian Hege, Andre Merzky, ... RZG-Garching Ulli Schwenn, Herman Lederer, Manuel Panea, ... Network providers DTelekom, DFN-Verein, Canarie/Teleglobe, Star Tap/vBNS NCSA John Shalf, Jason Novotny, Meghan Thornton, ... Washington University Wai-Mo Suen, Mark Miller, Malcolm Tobias, ... Argonne Ian Foster, Warren Smith, ...

    3. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Einstein’s Equations and Gravitational Waves Einstein’s General Relativity Fundamental theory of Physics (Gravity) Among most complex equations of physics Dozens of coupled, nonlinear hyperbolic-elliptic equations with 1000’s of terms Barely have capability to solve after a century Predict black holes, gravitational waves, etc. Exciting new field about to be born: Gravitational Wave Astronomy Fundamentally new information about Universe What are gravitational waves??: Ripples in spacetime curvature, caused by matter motion, causing distances to change: A last major test of Einstein’s theory: do the exist? Eddington: “Gravitational waves propagate at the speed of thought”

    4. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Detecting Gravitational Gravitational Waves

    5. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Computational Needs for 3D Numerical Relativity Explicit Finite Difference Codes ~ 104 Flops/zone/time step ~ 100 3D arrays Require 10003 zones or more ~1000 Gbytes Double resolution: 8x memory, 16x Flops TFlop, Tbyte machine required Parallel AMR, I/O essential Etc...

    6. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Example simulation: gravitational waves forming a BH in 3D (First such simulation!) Better quality underway right now at NCSA...

    7. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de (A Single) Such Large Scale Computation Requires Incredible Mix of Varied Technologies and Expertise! Many Scientific/Engineering Components formulation of EE’s, equation of state, astrophysics, hydrodynamics, etc. Many Numerical Algorithm Components Finite differences? Finite elements? Structured meshes? Hyperbolic equations: implicit vs implicit, shock treatments, dozens of methods (and presently nothing is fully satisfactory!) Elliptic equations: multigrid, Krylov subspace, spectral, preconditioners Mesh Refinement? Many Different Computational Components Parallelism (HPF, MPI, PVM, ???) Architecture Efficiency (MPP, DSM, Vector, NOW, ???) I/O Bottlenecks (generate gigabytes per simulation, checkpointing…) Visualization of all that comes out!

    8. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de This is fundamental question addressed by Cactus. Clearly need huge teams, with huge expertise base to attack such problems... In fact, need collections of communities to solve such problems... But how can they work together effectively? We need a simulation code environment that encourages this...

    9. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de NSF Black Hole Grand Challenge Alliance (1993-1998) University of Texas (Matzner, Browne) NCSA/Illinois/AEI (Seidel, Saylor, Smarr, Shapiro, Saied) North Carolina (Evans, York) Syracuse (G. Fox) Cornell (Teukolsky) Pittsburgh (Winicour) Penn State (Laguna, Finn)

    10. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de NASA Neutron Star Grand Challenge (1996-present) NCSA/Illinois/AEI (Saylor, Seidel, Swesty, Norman) Argonne (Foster) Washington U (Suen) Livermore (Ashby) Stony Brook (Lattimer)

    11. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de What we learn from Grand Challenges Successful, but also problematic… No existing infrastructure to support collaborative HPC Most scientists are bad Fortran programmers, and NOT computer scientists (especially physicists…like me…); suspicious of PSE’s, want complete control/access to their source code Many sociological issues of large collaborations and different cultures Many language barriers... Applied mathematicians, computational scientists, physicists have very different concepts and vocabularies… Code fragments, styles, routines often clash Successfully merged code (after years) often impossible to transplant into more modern infrastructure (e.g., add AMR or switch to MPI…) Many serious problems...

    12. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Large Scale Scientific/Engineering Collaboration

    13. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Cactus: new concept in community developed simulation code infrastructure Generally: Numerical/computational infrastructure to solve PDE’s Specifically: Modular Code for Solving Einstein Equations Over two dozen developers in an international collaboration in numerical relativity working through flexible, open, modular code infrastructure Cactus Divided in “Flesh” (core) and “Thorns” (modules or collections of subroutines) Parallelism largely automatic and hidden (if desired) from user Very modular, but with fixed interface between flesh and thorns User specifies flow: when to call thorns; code switches memory on and off User choice between Fortran and C; automated interface between them Freely available, open community source code: spirit of gnu/linux The code becomes the collaborating tool, just an accelerator is the focus of high energy physics experiment.

    14. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Cactus Computational Tool Kit (Allen, Massó, Goodale, Walker) Flesh (core) written in C Thorns (modules) grouped in packages written in F77, F90, C, C++ Thorn-Flesh interface fixed in 3 files written in CCL (Cactus Configuration Language): interface.ccl: Grid Functions, Arrays, Scalars (integer, real, logical, complex) param.ccl: Parameters and their allowed values schedule.ccl: Entry point of routines, dynamic memory and communication allocations Object oriented features for thorns (public, private, protected variables, inheritance) for clearer interfaces

    15. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Toolkits

    16. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Computational Toolkit: provides parallel utilities (thorns) for computational scientist Choice of parallel library layers (presently MPI-based) Portable, efficient (T3E, SGI, Dec Alpha, Linux, NT Clusters…) 3 mesh refinement schemes: Nested Boxes, DAGH, HLL (coming…) Parallel I/O (Panda, FlexIO, HDF5, etc…) Parameter Parsing Elliptic solvers (Petsc, Multigrid, SOR, etc…) Visualization Tools Globus INSERT YOUR CS MODULE HERE... To be maintained by AEI and NCSA

    17. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de How to use Cactus: Avoiding the MONSTER code syndrome... [Optional: Develop thorns, according to some rules e.g. specify variables through interface.ccl) Specify calling sequence of the thorns for given problem and algorithm (schedule.ccl)] Specify which thorns are desired for simulation (ADM+leapfrog +HRSC hydro+AH finder+wave extraction+AMR+…) Specified code is then created, with only those modules, those variables, those I/O routines, that AMR system,…, needed Subroutine calling lists generated automatically Automatically created for desired computer architecture Run it… Training/Tutorial at NCSA Aug 16-21 this summer...

    18. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de It works: dozens of people in “seed” community, with different backgrounds, personalities, on different continents, work together effectively. Connected modules actually work together, largely without collisions. Test suites used to ensure integrity of physics. Basis for various CS Research Projects I/O, AMR, Scaling, Elliptic Solvers, Distributed Computing, Etc… http://cactus.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Current Cactus Picture: Preparing for Public Release

    19. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Excellent scaling on many architectures Origin up to 256 processors T3E up to 1024 NCSA NT cluster up to 128 processors Achieved 142 Gflops/s on 1024 node T3E-1200 (benchmarked for NASA NS Grand Challenge) But, of course, we want much more…metacomputing...

    20. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de

    21. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de

    22. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Metacomputing: harnessing power when and where it is needed Einstein equations require extreme memory, speed Largest supercomputers too small! Networks very fast! DFN Gigabit testbed: 622 Mbits Potsdam-Berlin-Garching, connect multiple supercomputers Gigabit networking to US possible Connect workstations to make supercomputer Acquire resources dynamically during simulation! Seamless computing and visualization from anywhere Many metacomputing experiments in progress connecting Globus + Cactus...

    23. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de What we need and want : I. Exploration Got an idea? Write cactus module, link to other exisiting modules, and… Find Resources for interactive use: Garching? ZIB? NCSA? SDSC? Launch simulation. How? Watch simulation as it progresses... Need live visualization Limited bandwidth: compute viz. inline with simulation High bandwidth: ship data to be visualized locally Call in an expert colleague…let her watch it too Sharing data space Remote collaboration tools

    24. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Distributing Spacetime: SC’97 Intercontinental Metacomputing at AEI/Argonne/Garching/NCSA 1999: about to become part of production code!

    25. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de What we need and want: II. Production Find resources: Where? How many computers? Big jobs: “Fermilab” at disposal: must get it right while the beam is on! Launch Simulation How do get executable there? How to store data? What are local queue structure/OS idiosyncracies? Monitor the simulation Remote Visualization live while running Visualization server: all privileged users can login and check status/adjust if necessary...Interactive Steering Are parameters screwed up? Very complex? Is memory running low? AMR! What to do? Refine selectively or acquire additional resources via Globus? Delete unecessary grids? Postprocessing and analysis

    26. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Metacomputing the Einstein Equations: Connecting T3E’s in Berlin, Garching, San Diego

    27. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Details of our experiments... Different modalities of live visualization Viz computed in parallel with simulation: can save factors of 100 in data to be transferred, while adding minimal amount to simulation time... Data shipped and processed elsewhere: if bandwidth is sufficient, or algorithm prefers it, ship it all and process viz. locally... Scaling on multiple machines Tradeoffs between memory and performance Optimizations can be done to make it efficient enough to justify doing it...

    28. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de

    29. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Scaling of Cactus on two T3Es on different continents

    30. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Analysis of metacomputing experiments It works! (That’s the main thing we wanted at SC98…) … Cactus not optimized for metacomputing: messages too small, lower MPI bandwidth, could be better: ANL-NCSA Measured bandwidth 17Kbits/sec (small) --- 25Mbits/sec (large) Latency 4ms Munich-Berlin Measured bandwidth 1.5Kbits/sec (small) --- 4.2Mbits/sec (large) Latency 42.5ms Within single machine: Order of magnitude better Bottom Line: Expect to improve performance significantly with work Can run much larger jobs on multiple machines

    31. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Colliding Black Holes and MetaComputing: German Project supported by DFN-Verein Solving Einstein’s Equations Developing Techniques to Exploit High Speed Networks Remote Visualization Distributed Computing Across OC-12 Networks between AEI (Potsdam), Konrad-Zuse-Institut (Berlin), and RZG (Garching-bei-München)

    32. Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de

More Related