240 likes | 249 Views
This community meeting agenda outlines the requirements of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, the groundwater conditions in Sonoma Valley, and the proposed governance structure for the Groundwater Sustainability Agency.
E N D
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Sonoma Valley Governance March 27, 2017, Community Meeting
Agenda • Welcome • Meeting Purpose • Summary & Background • Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Requirements • Basin Conditions • Governance in Sonoma Valley • Board, Advisory Committee • Staffing & Funding • Next Steps/Timeline
SGMA Brief Summary • Three medium priority basins must comply with SGMA • Sonoma Valley • Petaluma Valley • Santa Rosa Plain
Required Steps to Groundwater Sustainability Step two Develop Groundwater Sustainability Plan January 31, 2022 Step three Achieve Sustainability 20 years after adoption of plan* Step one Form Groundwater Sustainability Agency June 30, 2017 * DWR may grant up to two, five-year extensions on implementation upon showing of good cause and progress
Management Authorities under SGMA • Groundwater Sustainability Agencies have authority to: • Conduct studies • Register & monitor wells • Set well spacing requirements • Require extraction reporting • Regulate extractions • Implement capital projects • Assess fees to cover costs • Required to Develop Groundwater Sustainability Plan by 2022
Sonoma Valley Water Conditions Estimated Total Water Use: 17,900 Acre-Feet (2012) • Urban demand primarily met through imported Russian River water • Agricultural and rural residential demand primarily met through local groundwater • At least 2,200 permitted groundwater wells Estimated Groundwater Use: 10,500 Acre-Feet (2012)
Forming Groundwater Sustainability Agencies PROPOSED GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE IN SONOMA VALLEY
Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) Framework Structure Sonoma Valley GSA & GSP Petaluma Valley GSA & GSP Santa Rosa Plain GSA & GSP 1 GSA & 1 GSP per basin with formal coordination between basins
Possible Areas of Coordination Between Basins • Development of Groundwater Sustainability Plans • Data framework/management system • Basin boundary adjustments • Funding requests to external entities (such as the state) • Any activities that impact the adjacent basin • Communication with state and federal agencies • Projects that cross basin boundaries • Regulation development • Development of funding mechanisms • Public outreach and stakeholder engagement • Monitoring protocols and coordination with adjacent basins • Staffing
Adopted Principles for DevelopingGSA Governance Options • Build upon existing cooperation and successful water management efforts in Sonoma County • Reinforce “local management” principles in SGMA • Share resources and identify cohesive approach • Costs should be equitably shared • Represent community stakeholders through advisory committees • Conduct robust and transparent outreach
Proposed Governance:Sonoma Valley GSA Board • GSA Eligibility: Determined by State • GSA Board: One rep from each GSA-eligible entity • Representation: Elected/appointed officials from each entity serve on board
Proposed Governance:Sonoma Valley • Voting: One vote per entity • Simple majority for “housekeeping” (contracts, setting meeting dates, etc.) • Super-majority vote (2/3%) needed for fees, regulations, budgets • Unanimous vote needed to assess entities (if additional funds are needed for operating the GSA)
Proposed GovernanceSonoma Valley Advisory Body • Strong advisory body: Created for stakeholder input • Purpose: Advise GSA Board on plan development & implementation • Appointments: Formal application process • Representation: Most entities prefer advisory panel open to community members and staff • Terms: Two-year terms • Transparency: Public process, Brown Act meetings • Decision-making: Charter & protocols
Advisory Body Role Advise GSA Board on: • Development and implementation of Groundwater Sustainability plan • Regulations • Fees • Capital projects • Programs • Communications with stakeholder constituencies
Start-Up Costs • Funding subcommittee formed representing all basins • 3 start-up cost components: • GSP preparation (largest cost component) • Administration & operations • Development of revenue mechanism • Estimates compare well with estimates from other areas • Focusing on coordination & utilization of existing staff to reduce costs • Start-up costs will be covered by commitments from GSA-participating entities
Sonoma Valley Management & Staffing • No new staff during first year • Valley of the Moon Water District will serve as interim administrator until GSA Board determines management structure • Other entities will provide in-kind services for: • Technical services • Monitoring • Fiscal services • Outreach • Staff from all entities will serve as sounding board for contracts and other issues
Final Decision Making on GSA Formation • Decision-makers: Boards and Councils of GSA-eligible agencies • Public Input: Public officials will consider public input • When? Spring 2017 • How? Legal documents will be completed in April-May 2017 for approval by Boards and Councils
What’s Next • April/May: Councils/Boards consider adoption of legal agreement • May/June: GSA holds public hearing to form • June: State notified of formation
Resources & Email List www.sonomacountygroundwater.org Go online and join email list to receive monthly updates
Domestic Wells and SGMA • Referred to as “de minimis” users in SGMA • Use 2 acre-feet per year or less for domestic purposes • De minimis users are subject to SGMA, depending on local needs • GSAs will decide how de minimis users are incorporated • GSAs can decide to exclude or include • GSAs can decide on fees • GSAs cannot require metering • May be subject to reporting and fees to state if intervention occurs • Domestic wells can also be regulated by authorities (countiesand cities, etc.) outside the scope of SGMA