310 likes | 510 Views
Coronal Faraday Rotation: Diagnostics of Current Sheets and MHD Waves. Steven R. Spangler, Laura D. Ingleby, Laura G. Spitler, Catherine A. Whiting. Scope of Talk: Observations of Extragalactic Radio Sources with Radio Interferometers. Very Large Array. Radio interferometer 27 antennas
E N D
Coronal Faraday Rotation: Diagnostics of Current Sheets and MHD Waves Steven R. Spangler, Laura D. Ingleby, Laura G. Spitler, Catherine A. Whiting
Scope of Talk: Observations of Extragalactic Radio Sources with Radio Interferometers
Very Large Array • Radio interferometer • 27 antennas • B or A array • Observations taken at 1465 and 1665 MHz
Advantages of Interferometric Observations of Extragalactic Radio Sources • Simultaneous measurements on a set of lines of sight (pharetra) through the corona • Use of “constellations” of radio sources for tomographic-like analyses
Plasma Contributions to the Faraday Rotation Integral We need enough observations to sort out various contributions to coronal density and magnetic field
New Coronal Faraday Rotation Results from the VLA • Project AS764: August, 2003; 2X10 hour sessions on source 3C228 • Project AS826: March-April 2005; 4X10 hour sessions (plus reference) for coronal “tomography”
Project AS826 • Observations: • March 12 • March 19 • March 28 • April 1 • May 29 (reference) • 19 sources, 20 lines of sight
Results from Project AS764: Continuous Observations of 3C228 on August 16 and 18, 2003 • Measurement of RM(t) to source as a whole • Measurement of “Differential Faraday Rotation”, different rotation measures along different lines of sight (A,B, and C)
Faraday Rotation to 3C228 on August 16, 2003 Remarkably little differential Faraday rotation observed
Spatial Structure Function (no Taylor Hypothesis!) Diff. RM feature
Preliminary and Tentative Rotation Measure Structure Function Results • August 16, 15.77-18.62 UT: DRM < 0.38 rad/m2 • August 16, 20.53-23.22 UT: DRM < 4.8 rad/m2 • August 18, 20 -24 UT: DRM < 0.25 rad/m2
Meaning of Result in Terms of Coronal Plasma Parameters From Minter and Spangler (1996), magnetic field fluctuations only Turbulence properties
Quantitative Significance of Observed RM Structure Functions August 16, 6.2R August 18, 5.2R e=0.5 l=0.1R e=1.0 L=1.0R
How Can Faraday Rotation Observations Probe the Overall Structure of the Coronal Plasma? (AS826)
Global RM Models: How well can synoptic coronal models account for FR Measurements? Mancuso and Spangler 2000 Residuals of ~ 2-3 rad/sq-m
AS826: Use of Synoptic Model for Corona These measurements of magnetic field and density at ~ 3R can be used to estimate B and n at greater distances probed by Faraday Rotation
Estimating the distant coronal plasma from measurements at ~3 R An and AB are arbitrary adjustment factors
Conclusions • Simple synoptic models of the corona roughly reproduce “Pharetrae” of Faraday Rotation measurements, but large residuals. • Measurements consistent with coronal field of 30-80mG at r=6R. (Paetzold 1987) • Rotation measure changes substantially on timescales of a few hours; too slow to be turbulence. Thus “Mesoscale Plasma Structures”. • Smaller, faster fluctuations attributable to waves seen in spacecraft beacon data. • Spatial variations in RM (differential Faraday Rotation) are small; constraints on coronal turbulence are reasonable but not decisive
Future Developments • EVLA (Expanded VLA): Enormous increase in sensitivity of the VLA, in progress. But only if feed design prevents system temperature increase due to Sun. • VLA at 5 GHz: Could make measurements closer to the Sun, observations have more impact.