180 likes | 472 Views
5 February 2004. 2. Hep Tx Steering Committee. The DRAFT QA Analysis. Retrospective analysis outlining the amount and type of hepatotoxic-predictive data available in reviews of selected NDAs 26 drugs selected Identified by Clinical Subcommittee of HepTox SC13 ?Hepatotoxic" and 13 ?Non-hepatotoxi
E N D
1. 5 February 2004 Hep Tx Steering Committee 1 Can We Predict Hepatotoxicity Based on MO Reviews of Submitted Data? A Review of Selected NDAs
Lana Pauls, MPH
Director, Quality Assurance Staff
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
2. 5 February 2004 2 Hep Tx Steering Committee The DRAFT QA Analysis Retrospective analysis outlining the amount and type of hepatotoxic-predictive data available in reviews of selected NDAs
26 drugs selected
Identified by Clinical Subcommittee of HepTox SC
13 “Hepatotoxic” and 13 “Non-hepatotoxic”
3. 5 February 2004 3 Hep Tx Steering Committee Variables Assessed Hy’s Law (working version):
AST or ALT = 3 x ULN and bilirubin = 2x ULN
Usually on a background of increased rate of high serum transaminase elevations, compared to control
Other
Various degrees of transaminase elevations (TA), e.g.: 3x, 5x, 8x) in drug and control groups
overall increased rate of TA elevation compared to control
For uncontrolled studies, a rate of = 3%
4. 5 February 2004 4 Hep Tx Steering Committee Selected drugs Selacryn (ticrynafen)
Duract (bromfenac)
Rezulin (bromfenac)
Tasmar (tolcapone)
Felbatol (felbamate)
Unicard (dilevalol)
Normozide (labetolol)
Trovan (trovafloxacin)
Zyflo Filmtab (zileuton)
Isoniazid (isoniazide)
Depacon (valproic acid)
Pexid (perhexilene)
Cognex (tacrine) Glucophage (metformin)
Avandia (rosiglitizone)
Comtran (entacapone)
Avelox (moxifloxacin)
Vioxx (rofecoxib)
Celebrex (celecoxib)
Avepro (irbesartan)
Ambien (zolpidem)
Trileptal (oxcarbazepine)
Topomax (topiramate)
Geodon (ziprasadone)
Protonix (pantoprazole)
Accolate (zafirkulast)
5. 5 February 2004 5 Hep Tx Steering Committee Data Examined Integrated Summary of Safety (ISS) provided by sponsor
Not required till 1985
Medical Review (MOR) conducted by FDA for original application and any amendments PRIOR to original FDA action
6. 5 February 2004 6 Hep Tx Steering Committee Data Examined Presence/absence of the variables in question
Applications/reviews were counted as containing data if the variable was examined, not necessarily if the analysis had patients/subjects meeting the criteria
7. 5 February 2004 7 Hep Tx Steering Committee Data Found or Not Found No data were available (either ISS or MOR) for two applications
4 applications were submitted before an ISS was required (data from MOR only)
labetolol
ticrynafen
isoniazide
perhexilene
8. 5 February 2004 8 Hep Tx Steering Committee Hepatotoxic: Where Were Data ?
9. 5 February 2004 9 Hep Tx Steering Committee Non-Hepatotoxic: Where Were Data?
10. 5 February 2004 10 Hep Tx Steering Committee Existence of Documented Data When I say documented data, I mean that at least it was mentioned, regardless of whether no patients met the criteriaWhen I say documented data, I mean that at least it was mentioned, regardless of whether no patients met the criteria
11. 5 February 2004 11 Hep Tx Steering Committee Hepatotoxic:AST = 3 x ULN tolcapone
Only application that listed multiple transaminase elevation levels (3x, 5x, 8x)
dilevalol
zileuton
Very little focus on AST alone; sponsor indicated AST not sufficiently specific
bromfenac
No data on AST only, only in combo with ALT and/or bilirubin
valproic acid
tacrine
perhexilene
65/872 “clinically meaningful elevations in serum enzymes which assess liver function”
12. 5 February 2004 12 Hep Tx Steering Committee Non-Hepatotoxic:AST = 3 x ULN metformin
rosiglitazone
Listed multiple TA elevations (> 3x, 5-8x)
entacapone
moxifloxacin
irbesartan
addressed parameter; no patients
zolpidem
addressed parameter; no patients
oxcarbazepine
topiramate
ziprasadone
13. 5 February 2004 13 Hep Tx Steering Committee HepatotoxicALT = 3x ULN tolcapone
Listed multiple TA elevations (3x, 5x, 8x)
zileuton
bromfenac
no info on ALT only; 4/830 had both AST and ALT = 3
tacrine
dilevalol
identified patients with 2x
perhexilene
22/872 “clinically important drug related changes in serum enzyme values (SGOT and SGPT)”
14. 5 February 2004 14 Hep Tx Steering Committee Non-Hepatotoxic ALT = 3x ULN metformin
rosiglitazone
identified various TA elevations (3 x, 5- >8x)
entacapone
moxifloxacin
irbesartan
zolpidem
topiramate
ziprasadone
15. 5 February 2004 15 Hep Tx Steering Committee Cases Meeting Hy’s Law tacrine (hepatotoxic)
1/1061; 0/1061 placebo
metformin (non)
1/357; 0/174 glyburide; 0/192 metformin + glyburide
topiramate (non)
criteria addressed, no patients
16. 5 February 2004 16 Hep Tx Steering Committee Unclear Documentation; Common Themes AST and/or ALT listed as “increased” – no numbers or rates provided
MOR indicated numbers of patients with AST/ALT elevations, but not if same patients
per MOR “no clinically meaningful changes in hematologic laboratory parameters”
per MOR 75% “clinically significant labs”
per MOR “14/137 liver enzyme abnormalities”
17. 5 February 2004 17 Hep Tx Steering Committee Unclear Documentation; Common Themes - 2 per MOR “clinically meaningful elevations in serum enzymes which assess liver function”
Unclear what criteria were used to make these assessments, and obviously not the same for all MOs
18. 5 February 2004 18 Hep Tx Steering Committee Perhexilene:An Interesting Case no ISS (before requirement)
65/872 “clinically meaningful elevations in serum enzymes which assess liver function”
22/872 “clinically important drug-related changes in serum enzyme values (SGOT and SGPT)
per MOR “In summary, perhexilene causes significant enzyme elevations (SGOT and SGPT) in approximately 9% of patients at 400 mg/day”
NO documentation of Hy’s law cases
original proposed labeling prior to WD before action:
“perhexilene should be administered with caution to patients with a history of liver disease. . .”
19. 5 February 2004 19 Hep Tx Steering Committee Conclusions Inconsistent documentation of AST, ALT and Hy’s Law cases in both ISS and MOR
More recent applications (late 90’s) have more complete documentation
Measures are being taken to improve consistency of use:
DRAFT safety review document includes use of these variables
Revised clinical template includes use of these variables (refers to safety document)