1 / 28

James C. Renick School of Education

James C. Renick School of Education. North Carolina A&T State University - Greensboro. PSU AE Senior Thesis 2006 Mick Leso - Structural. Location Existing Conditions Structural System Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions. Introduction.

ryder
Download Presentation

James C. Renick School of Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. James C. Renick School of Education North Carolina A&T State University - Greensboro PSU AE Senior Thesis 2006 Mick Leso - Structural

  2. Location Existing Conditions Structural System Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Introduction PROJECT TEAM • Owner North Carolina A&T State University • Architect The Freelon Group • Structural Stewart Engineering, Inc. • MEP RMF Engineering, Inc. • LArch Sasaki Associates, Inc. • Lighting Light Defines Form AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  3. Location Existing Conditions Structural System Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Introduction BUILDING STATISTICS • 64,000 sq. ft. • Education/Administrative Use • 3 Stories Above Grade • Total Height: 48’-2” • Predicted Cost: $14 million • Construction: Summer ’06-Fall ’07 • 2 Boilers running at 60% • 250 Ton, Water-Cooled, Rotary Screw Chiller • (2) 2000 kVA transformers • 750 kW Standby Diesel Generator AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  4. Location Introduction Structural System Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Existing Conditions ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES • 52’-6” Long, 40’ Wide Cantilever • 2 Stories w/ Varying Floor-to-Floor Height • 13’-4” Pedestrian Clearance 12’-6” 14’-2” 17’ AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  5. Location Introduction Structural System Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Existing Conditions ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES • Exterior Façades Aluminum Mesh Sunscreen Fins Glazed Curtain Wall Concrete Panels w/ Exposed Rivets Steel Cantilever Truss Classroom Ribbon Windows Norman Brick Slate Panels AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  6. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System OVERVIEW • Steel Braced Frame on Shallow Foundation • Expansion Joint • Seismic Loads Control South Bldg. North Bldg. AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  7. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System WIDE FLANGE CANTILEVER TRUSSES • Preassembled for Speed Construction • Splices for Easy Transportation Splice Locations Splice Locations AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  8. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System WIDE FLANGE CANTILEVER TRUSSES • Continuous Span W14x211 & W14x90 Girders AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  9. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System WIDE FLANGE CANTILEVER TRUSSES • Columns Spliced Each Floor Level W14x43 Columns AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  10. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System WIDE FLANGE CANTILEVER TRUSSES W14x132 Main Columns AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  11. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System WIDE FLANGE CANTILEVER TRUSSES • Steel Strong in Tension W14x43 Truss Webs AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  12. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System WIDE FLANGE CANTILEVER TRUSSES • Additional Members in Compression W14x90 Truss Webs AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  13. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System TRUSS CONNECTIONS • Braces • Cap/Base Plates • Stiffener Plates • Gusset Plates • Assorted Angles • # of Bolts Varies • Splices • 88 Bolts (1” Diameter) • 1½” Thick Plates AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  14. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System HSS RECTANGULAR TUBE BRACING 6”x6”x½” Vertical Chevron Braces 8”x8”x¼” Horizontal Tubes Below Each Floor Slab AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  15. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS • Two 12” Thick Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls • Composite Floor System • 3¼” Lightweight Concrete on 2” Metal Deck • 4” Shear Studs • Typical Beams: W21x44 & W24x55 • Shallow Foundation • 3000 psi, Normal Weight Concrete • Range From 1’-6” to 2’-6” Depth • Seven Cylinder-shaped Concrete Caissons • 6’ Diameter, Typically 12’ Deep • Supports Cantilever Columns AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  16. Location Introduction Existing Conditions Research Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural System CANTILEVER STRUCTURE AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  17. Introduction Existing Conditions Structural System Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Research CANTILEVERS • Examples • Diving Platforms • Cranes • Cantilever Bridges • Balance AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  18. Introduction Existing Conditions Structural System Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Research FALLINGWATER • Reinforced Concrete • Dangerous Deflections • Post-Tensioning AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  19. Introduction Existing Conditions Structural System Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Research CHONGQING PUBLIC LIBRARY • Reinforced Concrete • 80’ Wide, 54’ Long Cantilever Section • Concrete Truss System (dimensions in mm.) AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  20. Existing Conditions Structural System Research Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Proposal SUPERSTRUCTURE CONSIDERATIONS • It is reasonable to build? • Advantages/Disadvantages? • Cost Comparison? Tension Reinforcement Balancing Weight Compression Reinforcement AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  21. Structural System Research Proposal Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural Depth CONCRETE TRUSS • Four Design Options • 25’ Column Spacing • Same Floor-Floor Heights AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  22. Structural System Research Proposal Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural Depth CONCRETE TRUSS • Similar to Cantilever Bridge w/ No Tension Members • 24”x40” Truss Web Members 30”x36” Main Column 24”x24” Girders 12”x16” Beams 12”x12” Columns AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  23. Structural System Research Proposal Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions Structural Depth EFFECTS ON LATERAL SYSTEM • Concrete Trusses • Act as Lateral Braces • Incredibly Rigid * Larger Building Weight Increases Seismic Loads * Requires Additional Shear Walls in ⊥Direction * Greater Building Weight Means Larger Foundation AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  24. Research Proposal Structural Depth Conclusions Questions Cost Analysis CONCRETE TRUSS SYSTEM Values for Greensboro (R.S. Means 2005) AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  25. Research Proposal Structural Depth Conclusions Questions Cost Analysis COMPARISON * Total Building Cost: $14,000,000 Values for Greensboro (R.S. Means 2005) AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  26. Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Questions Conclusions • Steel Braced Frame • Cheaper • Faster, More Precise Construction • Expansion Joint • Use of Composite Floor System • Lighter Superstructure • Seismic Conditions • Smaller Foundation AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  27. Proposal Structural Depth Cost Analysis Questions Conclusions • Compare Cantilever Designs • Proved Steel Structure is Best • Question the Signature Building AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

  28. Structural Depth Cost Analysis Conclusions Questions AE Senior Thesis ’06 Mick Leso - Structural Option

More Related