240 likes | 406 Views
Retail Market Assurance Services for the Irish Electricity Market. Anna Anderson Loughlin IGG 26 th August 2010 anna.anderson@gemserv.com. Agenda. Assurance activities MCR 0161 & Defect 8455 Update June 2010 Feedback / Lessons Learned Review November 2010 MDU. Assurance Activities.
E N D
Retail Market Assurance Services for the Irish Electricity Market Anna Anderson Loughlin IGG 26th August 2010 anna.anderson@gemserv.com
Agenda • Assurance activities • MCR 0161 & Defect 8455 Update • June 2010 Feedback / Lessons Learned Review • November 2010 MDU
Assurance Activities • Conducted project closure for June 2010 MDU • Lessons learned review carried out with RMDS • Obtained Market Participant feedback for June 2010 MDU • Two new Suppliers currently undergoing market entry • Preparation for MCR 0161 & Defect 8455 IPTs • Initial preparation for the November 2010 MDU assurance activities
MCR 0161 & Defect 8455 Update • MCR 0161 – Change from MIC to connection voltage as threshold for connection agreement return • New threshold to be medium voltage or higher • IPTs are scheduled for September 6th, 2010. • Go Live is planned for 18th September, 2010. • IPTs will be run by ESB CS
MCR 0161 & Defect 8455 Update • Defect 8455 to be included with MCR 0161 • Defect fix will resolve the bug in the following instances: • Where a reduction in the MIC has been requested • Existing CA request (in process) not recognised • Incorrectly triggers 102P • Incorrectly triggers duplicate CA
Market Participant Feedback from June 2010 Market Design Update • The approach was to contact all market participants for feedback • The information collated was categorised by: • Preparation • Documentation (RMDS and Gemserv) • IPT • Cut-over • Communication • Areas for future improvement
Preparation • Expected timescales on Project roadmap were met. • Relevant documentation was provided in a timely manner to set the expectations required for each market participant. • The tiered Assurance approach was appropriate for all market participants. • Greater consultation required for significant dates e.g. • Go-live date , schema release, IPT window
Documentation • Market documentation was comprehensive and straight forward to complete. • Request for the test scripts to be more descriptive for testing requirements.
IPT • A higher number of incorrect market messages were sent into Networks compared to previous MDU’s. • Networks were unable to receive/send messages for a period of time due to the test hub being down. • Most market participants kept to the agreed IPT schedule but there were some significant deviations which resulted in the re-scheduling of timeslots for some suppliers. • Some market participant evidence submissions were not provided in a timely manner.
Cut-over RMDS/ESBN were co-located for cut-over and this was found to be beneficial. RMDS staff commended for their assistance and support during this phase.
Communication All market participants thought communication with RMDS & Networks was very good particularly during cut-over. Market participants were happy with communication with Gemserv. Market participants were aware of all fixed dates for this MDU. Update e-mails from RMDS re: hub issues are favoured.
Areas for future improvement Future Market Design Updates for gas and electricity should not coincide as this puts a strain on internal IT resources (Supplier x 1). The format of market messages to be strictly adhered to in testing (Networks). Suppliers would like the technical instructions for future MPCC upgrades to be clearer (Supplier x 2). More robust controls should be in place for future MPCC upgrades (Supplier x 1).
Areas for future improvement More testing is executed prior to any future MPCC upgrade (Supplier x 1). Step by step instructions to be provided with test scripts (Supplier x 1). Market participants to have greater input into the prioritisation of market change requests (Supplier x 1). Suppliers would like future MPCC cut-overs to occur either out of hours or at weekends (Supplier x 2).
Areas for future improvement • Cut-over should not happen at the end of the month as it clashes with suppliers invoicing cycles (Supplier x 1).
Overall • Overall methodology for the June 2010 Market Design Update Programme was deemed suitable. • Some improvements have been identified.
Recommendations • Obtain “implementation specification” for MCRs’ to be delivered from Networks • Implementation specification to be circulated to IGG members • Gemserv, RMDS and ESB Networks to formulate joint project team to deliver future Market Design Updates • Market Participants to use operational staff to conduct future IPT’s
November 2010 MDU • MCR 0081 and MCR 0177 to be delivered • IPTs are scheduled for October 11th – 1st November, 2010. • Go Live is planned for 19th November, 2010. • IPTs will be run only by the Market Participants who operate in the Unmetered segment of the market.
November 2010 MDU • Participant Questionnaire will be sent to Market Participants on the 13th September, 2010. • Market Participants will have 4 weeks to complete and return the questionnaire. • Questionnaire to be submitted by October 11th, 2010.