360 likes | 671 Views
Growth Mixture Modeling of Longitudinal Data. David Huang, Dr.P.H., M.P.H. UCLA, Integrated Substance Abuse Program. Longitudinal Data. Subjects have repeated measures on some characteristics over time, which could be Medical history (ex blood pressure)
E N D
Growth Mixture Modeling of Longitudinal Data David Huang, Dr.P.H., M.P.H. UCLA, Integrated Substance Abuse Program
Longitudinal Data • Subjects have repeated measures on some characteristics over time, which could be • Medical history (ex blood pressure) • Children’s learning curve (ex. math score) • Baby’s growth curve (ex. weight) • Drug use history (ex. heroin use)
Growth Curve Modeling • Level 1 represents intra-individual difference in repeated measures over time. (individual growth curve). • Level 2 represents variation in individual growth curves.
Growth Curve Model with One Class (N = 436) Days use per month Years Since The First Use
Limitation of Growth Curve Model • Assume that growth curves are a sample from a single finite population. The growth model only represents a single average growth rate.
Growth Mixture Modeling • Including latent classes into growth curve modeling. • Modeling individual variation in growth rates. • Classifying trajectories by latent class analysis.
Growth Mixture Model in Mplus Source: Terry Duncan (2002). Growth Mixture Modeling of Adolescent Alcohol Use Data. www.ori.org/methodology
Source: Terry Duncan (2002). Growth Mixture Modeling of Adolescent Alcohol Use Data. www.ori.org/methodology
Source: Terry Duncan (2002). Growth Mixture Modeling of Adolescent Alcohol Use Data. www.ori.org/methodology
Source: Terry Duncan (2002). Growth Mixture Modeling of Adolescent Alcohol Use Data. www.ori.org/methodology
Source: Terry Duncan (2002). Growth Mixture Modeling of Adolescent Alcohol Use Data. www.ori.org/methodology
Source: Terry Duncan (2002). Growth Mixture Modeling of Adolescent Alcohol Use Data. www.ori.org/methodology
This study is based on 436 male heroin addicts who were admitted to the California Civil Addict Program at 1964-1965 and were followed in the three follow-up studies conducted every ten years over 33 years.
Growth Curve Model with Two Classes (N = 436) Days use per month Years Since The First Use
Growth Curve Model with Three Classes (N = 436) Days of use per month Years Since The First Use
Growth Curve Model with Four Classes (N = 436) Days of use per month Years Since The First Use
Growth Curve Model with Five Classes (N = 436) Days of use per month Years Since The First Use
Goodness of fit • Loglikelihood • Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) • Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) • Sample-size Adjusted BIC • Entropy
Adjusted BIC Index by Latent Classes Adjusted BIC Latent Classes
Difficulties in Model fitting • EM algorithm reaches a local maxima, rather than a global maxima. • Repeat EM algorithm with different sets of initial values. • Use BIC to compare the goodness-of-fit of models
Difficulties in Model fitting • EM algorithm would NOT converge. • Start with a simple model. Set variance of intercept and slope at zero. Assume residuals are constant across the classes.
Difficulties in Model fitting • Individual classification is model dependent and initial value dependent. Individual classification could vary in different models.
References • Terry Duncan (2002). Growth Mixture Modeling of Adolescent Alcohol Use Data. www.ori.org/methodology • Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345-368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.