120 likes | 283 Views
HIP-RG meeting, IETF 65 March 24, 2006. Andrei Gurtov and Tom Henderson {gurtov@hiit.fi; thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com}. Agenda. HIPRG agenda (draft) Friday, March 24, 2006, 1130-1400, Monet meeting room ------ 1. Administrative and agenda discussion
E N D
HIP-RG meeting, IETF 65 March 24, 2006 Andrei Gurtov and Tom Henderson {gurtov@hiit.fi; thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com}
Agenda HIPRG agenda (draft) Friday, March 24, 2006, 1130-1400, Monet meeting room ------ 1. Administrative and agenda discussion - draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01.txt status and IRTF review process 2. Drafts Experiment report status - draft-irtf-hip-experiment-02.txt (update) Opportunistic mode with TCP option - draft-lindqvist-hip-opportunistic-01.txt (update) Host Identity Protocol Location Privacy Extensions - draft-matos-hip-privacy-extensions-01.txt (update) SIP and HIP - draft-tschofenig-hiprg-hip-srtp-02.txt (update) - draft-tschofenig-hiprg-host-identities-03.txt (update) Advanced NAT/middlebox traversal; problem statement (Tschofenig) - draft-tschofenig-hiprg-hip-natfw-traversal-04.txt (update) 3. Software Status update of experimental implementations, and demos - HIP for inter.net (SPINAT demo) - InfraHIP (HIP-enabled firewall management interface) - OpenHIP (TBD)
RG status update • Mailing list: • http://honor.trusecure.com/mailman/listinfo/hipsec-rg • Supplemental web page: • http://www.openhip.org/irtf/wiki • Charter • Evaluate benefit/impact of deploying HIP • Experiment with HIP software • Analyze HIP in context of real networks • Prepare report to IESG new wiki
wiki input needed • Please contribute research papers and project links • http://www.openhip.org/irtf/wiki/
Experiment report draft-irtf-hip-experiment-02.txt • Our main RG deliverable • Intended to capture consensus for the IESG: • What are benefits and consequences of deploying HIP, or other ID/locator split? • What modifications to HIP are recommended? • Update to be discussed below
draft-irtf-hiprg-nat-01 status “Problem statement for Legacy NAT and Middlebox traversal” by Stiemerling et al. • RG agreed to move forward as an independent submission (old procedures) • in current RFC editor’s queue • Recently, new IRTF review process established • IRSG review to accelerate the draft • This draft one of three trying the new process (would be removed from current queue)
draft-irtf-hip-experiment-02 Draft reorganized and updated in four areas: • Host stack implications • Infrastructure implications • Application implications • Network operator’s perspective • More inputs needed from experimenters and early adopters • Initial version (for IAB socialization) by end of year?
Software sites • Three public implementations of HIP available: • HIPL (HIP for Linux) (Helsinki HIIT) • http://infrahip.hiit.fi • HIP4BSD/HIPE (Ericsson NomadicLab) • http://hip4inter.net • OpenHIP • http://www.openhip.org • Three test servers: • http://hipserver.mct.phantomworks.org • http://woodstock{4|6}.hip4inter.net • http://hipserver.hiit.fi
Software status • Current status and plans for HIP software
Demos • OpenHIP • HIPL (GUI support for firewall configuration) • HIPE (SPINAT)