230 likes | 497 Views
Part of Speech Tagging. Importance Resolving ambiguities by assigning lower probabilities to words that don’t fit Applying to language grammatical rules to parse meanings of sentences and phrases. Part of Speech Tagging. Determine a word’s lexical class based on context.
E N D
Part of Speech Tagging Importance Resolving ambiguities by assigning lower probabilities to words that don’t fit Applying to language grammatical rules to parse meanings of sentences and phrases
Part of Speech Tagging Determine a word’s lexical class based on context Approaches to POS Tagging
Approaches to POS Tagging • Initialize and maintain tagging criteria • Supervised: uses pre-tagged corpora • Unsupervised: Automatically induce classes by probability and learning algorithms • Partially supervised: combines the above approaches • Algorithms • Rule based: Use pre-defined grammatical rules • Stochastic: use HMM and other probabilistic algorithms • Neural: Use neural nets to learn the probabilities
Example The man ate the fish on the boat in the morning
Word Class Categories Note: Personal pronoun often PRP, Possessive Pronoun often PRP$
Word Classes • Open (Classes that frequently spawn new words) • Common Nouns, Verbs, Adjectives, Adverbs. • Closed (Classes that don’t often spawn new words): • prepositions: on, under, over, … • particles: up, down, on, off, … • determiners: a, an, the, … • pronouns: she, he, I, who, ... • conjunctions: and, but, or, … • auxiliary verbs: can, may should, … • numerals: one, two, three, third, … Particle: An uninflected item with a grammatical function but withoutclearly belonging to a major part of speech. Example: He looked up the word.
Words often are in multiple classes. Example: this This is a nice day = preposition This day is nice = determiner You can go this far = adverb Accuracy 96 – 97% is a baseline for new algorithms 100% impossible even for human annotators Unambiguous: 35,340 The Linguistics Problem (Derose, 1988)
Rule-Based Tagging • Basic Idea: • Assign all possible tags to words • Remove tags according to a set of rules • Example rule:IF word+1 is adjective, adverb, or quantifier ending a sentence IF word-1 is not a verb like “consider” THEN eliminate non-adverb ELSE eliminate adverb • There are more than 1000 hand-written rules
Stage 1: Rule-based tagging • First Stage: FOR each word Get all possible parts of speech using a morphological analysis algorithm • Example NN RB VBNJJ VB PRP VBD TO VB DT NN She promised to back the bill
Stage 2: Rule-based Tagging • Apply rules to remove possibilities • Example Rule:IF VBD is an option and VBN|VBD follows “<start>PRP”THEN Eliminate VBN NN RB VBNJJ VB PRP VBD TO VB DT NN She promised to back the bill
Stochastic Tagging • Use probability of certain tag occurring given various possibilities • Requires a training corpus • Problems to overcome • Algorithm to assign type for words that are not in corpus • Naive Method • Choose most frequent tag in training text for each word! • Result: 90% accuracy
HMM Stochastic Tagging • Intuition: Pick the most likely tag based on context • Maximize the formula using a HMM • P(word|tag) × P(tag|previous n tags) • Observe: W = w1, w2, …, wn • Hidden: T = t1,t2,…,tn • Goal: Find the part of speech that most likely generate a sequence of words
Transformation-Based Tagging (TBL) (Brill Tagging) • Combine Rule-based and stochastic tagging approaches • Uses rules to guess at tags • machine learning using a tagged corpus as input • Basic Idea: Later rules correct errors made by earlier rules • Set the most probable tag for each word as a start value • Change tags according to rules of type:IF word-1 is a determiner and word is a verb THEN change the tag to noun • Training uses a tagged corpus • Step 1: Write a set of rule templates • Step 2: Order the rules based on corpus accuracy
TBL: The Algorithm • Step 1: Use dictionary to label every word with the most likely tag • Step 2: Select the transformation rule which most improves tagging • Step 3: Re-tag corpus applying the rules • Repeat 2-3 until accuracy reaches threshold • RESULT: Sequence of transformation rules
TBL: Problems • Problems • Infinite loops and rules may interact • The training algorithm and execution speed is slower than HMM • Advantages • It is possible to constrain the set of transformations with “templates”IF tag Z or word W is in position *-kTHEN replace tag X with tag • Learns a small number of simple, non-stochastic rules • Speed optimizations are possible using finite state transducers • TBL is the best performing algorithm on unknown words • The Rules are compact and can be inspected by humans • Accuracy • First 100 rules achieve 96.8% accuracyFirst 200 rules achieve 97.0% accuracy
Neural Network Digital approximation of biological neurons
W Neuron INPUTS W Outputs Σ f(n) W Activation Function W W=Weight Digital Neuron
1 Output 0 Input Transfer Functions
Networks without feedback Multiple Inputs and Single Layer Multiple Inputs and layers
Feedback (Recurrent Networks) Feedback
Expected Output Inputs from the environment Actual System Actual Output + Σ Neural Network - Error Supervised Learning Training Run a set of training data through the network and compare the outputs to expected results. Back propagate the errors to update the neural weights, until the outputs match what is expected
Output Layer Inputs First Hidden layer Second Hidden Layer Multilayer Perceptron Definition:Anetworkof neurons in which the output(s)ofsome neurons are connectedthroughweightedconnections to theinput(s) of other neurons.
Function Signals Error Signals Backpropagation of Errors