1 / 38

The Eye of the Storm or the Eye of the Needle: The Challenge of Climate Change

The Eye of the Storm or the Eye of the Needle: The Challenge of Climate Change. Energy Star ® Participants Meeting Toronto, May 4, 2006 Ralph Torrie Vice President, ICF International Toronto, May 2006 rtorrie@icfi.com. Five warmest years of the past century

salaam
Download Presentation

The Eye of the Storm or the Eye of the Needle: The Challenge of Climate Change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Eye of the Storm or the Eye of the Needle: The Challenge of Climate Change Energy Star® Participants MeetingToronto, May 4, 2006Ralph TorrieVice President, ICF InternationalToronto, May 2006rtorrie@icfi.com

  2. Five warmest years of the past century have all occurred in the past decade First 8 months of 2005 Source: NOAA at ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/anomalies

  3. Models can also be tested for their ability to realistically simulate past climate behaviour Source: IPCC 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes [Houghton, J.T., et al. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.p 11.

  4. IPCC projects that the world will become MUCH, MUCH warmer Source: IPCC 2001. Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Watson,R.T et al. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. p 140.

  5. Probabilistic approach suggests sensitivity near 3.2°C Source: Murphy et al. 2004 Nature 430:768-772 (also Science 305:933)

  6. How long have we got? We have to stabilize emissions of carbon dioxide within a decade, or temperatures will warm by more than one degree. That will be warmer than it has been for half a million years, and many things could become unstoppable. If we are to stop that, we cannot wait for new technologies like capturing emissions from burning coal. We have to act with what we have. This decade, that means focusing on energy efficiency and renewable sources of energy that do not burn carbon. We don't have much time left. Jim Hansen NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, February 2006

  7. How do we defend ourselves against climate change?....

  8. Start by remembering the basic “house rules” for Planet Earth… • Everything goes somewhere. • Everything is connected. (You cannot do just one thing.) • Nature is an independent power, and does not negotiate.

  9. Society Economy Environment

  10. Stabilization Targets Global greenhouse gas emission scenarios corresponding to different stabilization levels

  11. Low Emission Futures – Context for a “Made in Canada” Approach • Ongoing population growth • A large and growing fossil fuel production sector oriented to export markets • Energy intensive industries (paper, metals, steel, industrial chemicals) important to Canadian economy, although in relative decline and also climbing value added curve in globalized market • Fuel and electricity relatively inexpensive

  12. Long term and deep emission reduction scenarios take us outside the climate change policy box, supports a “fresh look” at strategies and options

  13. Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Canada(full cycle emission allocation)

  14. Beyond Kyoto – A Low Emissions Path for Canada

  15. Source: R. Torrie, “Low Emission Scenarios in an Expanding, Industrialized, Oil Exporting Economy: The Case of Canada”. http://2050.nies.go.jp/2050sympo/cop11_side/Torrie_COP11.pdf

  16. JAPAN Source: Dr. Junichi Fujino, “Development of Japan Low Carbon Society Japan Low Carbon Society Scenarios toward 2050 Scenarios toward 2050”. http://2050.nies.go.jp/2050sympo/cop11_side/Fujino_COP11.pdf

  17. GERMANY Source: Martin Weiss, “Long Term Climate Policy Scenarios for Germany”. http://2050.nies.go.jp/2050sympo/cop11_side/Weiss_COP11.pdf

  18. AUSTRALIA Source: Hugh Saddler et al., “A Clean Energy Future for Australia”. http://www.enerstrat.com.au/publications.html

  19. AUSTRALIA -- ELECTRICITY FUEL MIX IN 2001, 2040 BASELINE, & 2040 SCENARIO 2 Source: Hugh Saddler et al., “A Clean Energy Future for Australia”. http://www.enerstrat.com.au/publications.html

  20. INDIA Source: PR. Shukla, “Low Carbon scenarios for India to 2050”. http://2050.nies.go.jp/2050sympo/cop11_side/Shukla_COP11.pdf

  21. A Possible “Made in Canada” Low Emission FutureFIVE PRIORITIES • Continued improvements in energy productivity of economy, including Factor Four Efficiency gain • Cogeneration of electricity • Biofuels • Carbon sequestration • Decarbonize electricity generation

  22. Collateral Benefits • Co-benefits of emission reduction will be critical to success: • Reduced air pollution and improved public health • Higher performance buildings • Economic competitiveness in global market • Enhanced urban environments • Employment generation across a broad spectrum of skills and professions • Technological advancement

  23. Synergies • Emission reductions are consistent with some exogenous trends in Canadian society – these synergies can be exploited to promote lower emissions (urban redensification, refurbishment of post-War infrastructure, higher value added industrial production)

  24. Implementing Low Emission Futures – The Eye of the Needle • Low emission futures have policy implications well beyond conventional energy policy. They must be developed in a broader context of sustainable development • Energy price based strategies perhaps necessary but not sufficient • Technology deployment fundamentally economic, but constrained by underdeveloped organizational and financial infrastructure, entrenched advantage of commodity suppliers, and externalization of environmental costs. • Global marketing, rapid deployment will characterize demand side developments. • Local authorities must engage; community transformation • Climatic conditions will deteriorate for decades, regardless of mitigation effort

  25. Economic, Energy and Emissions Growth in Canada, 1970-1998

  26. Energy Growth in Canada, 1970-1998

  27. Thank you! Ralph D. Torrie rtorrie@icfi.com

More Related