1 / 12

Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System

Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System. Informal document No . GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008 Agenda item 4(a). OICA POSITION. Summary. Data: EU, F, J. Scope and justifications for a future UNECE regulation. Requirements for AEBS.

sallylee
Download Presentation

Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Advanced Emergency Braking System/Lane Departure Warning System Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008Agenda item 4(a) OICA POSITION

  2. Summary Data: EU, F, J Scope and justifications for a future UNECE regulation Requirements for AEBS Requirements for LDWS Organization of the work

  3. Fatalities and Serious Injuriesby Vehicle Category (EU19) Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one light vehicle Light vehicles mainly collide with each other Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one heavy commercial vehicle Heavy commercial vehicles mainly collide with light vehicles When 1 HCV involved, nearly ½ of all serious injuries and fatalities occur in light vehicles. Source: CARE, EU19 in 2006 (LAB)

  4. Accidents Caused by Large Trucksby Accident Type (Japan) When 1 HCV involved, more than ½ of all accidents are rear-end accidents Source: Macro Accident Data Japan 2005

  5. Fatalities and Serious Injuriesby Accident Type (France) Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one light vehicle The part of front-rear accidents is nearly the double for HCV compared to light vehicles • Conclusions about available data: Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one heavy commercial vehicle • The efficiency of one given AEBS/LDWS varies according to the vehicle category (slide 3) • The efficiency of a system potentially preventing front-rear accidents is nearly the double on a HCV compared to a light vehicle (slides 4 & 5) Source: BAAC, France in 2007 (LAB)

  6. Current Situation forAdvanced Vehicle Systems Warning Systems Advanced Vehicle Warning Systems already exist on a few vehicles No safety need for rulemaking when voluntarily fitted Active (intervening) Systems Advanced Vehicle Active Systems already exist on a few vehicles (acting on braking or steering) Safety is ensured by CEL Annex of UNECE R13/13H and R79 With regard to existing regulations, additional rulemaking has the only purpose to align the provisions if the systems are fitted or required. 6

  7. Installation of AEBS/LDWS EU is the first region to require installation of AEBS and LDWS on some categories Scope proposed by EC: "Vehicles in Categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 shall be equipped with an AEBS/LDWS which shall meet the requirements of this Regulation." Timeframe proposed by EC: 29 October 2013 for New Types 29 October 2015 for New Registrations In order not to waste time and resources, future UNECE Regulations on AEBS and LDWS should be “if fitted” requirements based on the scope proposed by OICA and the timeframe for mandatory installation proposed by EC.

  8. 5.000.000.000 N2, 3,5t to 12t N3, > 12t 4.500.000.000 4.000.000.000 3.500.000.000 Fahrleistungen (Annahme) 3.000.000.000 > 12t 135.000 km 7 - 12t 60.000 km 2.500.000.000 < 7t 17.000 km Mileage x Number of vehicles (km) 2.000.000.000 1.500.000.000 1.000.000.000 500.000.000 0 7001 7500 7501 8000 8001 9000 3501 4000 4001 5000 5001 6000 6001 7000 bis bis bis bis bis bis bis 20000 20001 22000 22001 24000 24001 26000 18001 10000 10001 12000 12001 14000 14001 16000 16001 18000 bis bis bis bis bis bis 9001 bis bis bis Gross vehicle mass (kg) Mileage data helps defining the relevant scope Average vehicle mileage: > 12 tonnes : 135.000 km/year 7 – 12 tonnes: 60.000 km/year < 7 tonnes: 17.000 km/year Mileage x quantity of vehicles (km) Gross Vehicle Mass (kg) Source: VDA 2007

  9. Implementation of new UNECE Regulation The systems are the most efficient on the following categories: M3 Class II and III, > 12 t 4 x 2 and 6 x 2 (exception for M3G) and N3 > 16 t 4 x 2 and 6 x 2 (exception for N3G) Should the installation be unavoidable, OICA recommends to limit the scope to these categories A reasonable limitation of the scope is also necessary to respect the EU time frame 9

  10. Requirements for AEBS No need to regulate categories where system is not required Some systems already available Currently no specific regulation Avoid unnecessary packaging AEBS to be introduced into a new UNECE regulation This regulation to be separated from LDWS Keep legal flexibility for non EU CPs Aim: Collision avoidance Aim: Collision mitigation/reduction

  11. Requirements for LDWS No need to regulate categories where system is not required Some systems already available Currently no specific regulation UNECE R79 covers active systems This regulation to be separated from AEBS LDWS to be introduced into a new UNECE regulation Keep legal flexibility for non EU CPs Aim: lane keep and change assist Aim: warning only

  12. October 2013 for New Types • October 2015 for New Registration Organization of work • Time frame for development of the new regulation should be compatible with the introduction dates EU dates • Content of the regulation should be compatible with the introduction dates Time frame • One informal working group is sufficient Content Optimization of the resources

More Related