1 / 2

Bibliografía

Bibliografía. 1)Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screeningand diagnosis. Fourth edition . Luxembourg : Office for Official Publicationsof the European Communities ; 2006.

salome
Download Presentation

Bibliografía

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bibliografía 1)Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. Europeanguidelinesforqualityassurance in breastcancerscreeningand diagnosis. Fourthedition. Luxembourg: Office forOfficialPublicationsoftheEuropeanCommunities; 2006. 2)Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, Sisney GA, Kuni CC, CutterGR.Comparison of full-field digital mammographywithscreen-film mammographyforcancerdetection: results of 4,945 pairedexaminations.Radiology. 2001 ;218(3):873-80. 3)John M. Lewin, Carl J. D'Orsi R. Edward Hendrick, Lawrence J. Moss, Pamela K. Isaacs, Andrew Karellas and Gary R. Cutter. Clinicalcomparison of full-field digital mammography and screenfilm mammographyfordetection of breastcancer. AJR.2002;179:671-7. 4)Skaane P, Young K, SkjennaldAPopulation-basedmammographyscreening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammographywithsoft-copyreading--Oslo I study. Radiology. 2003 (3):877-884 5)Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus full-fielddigitalmammographywithsoft-copyreading: randomized trial in apopulation-basedscreeningprogram--the Oslo II Study. Radiology. 2004;232(1):197-204. 6)Skaane P, Hofvind S, SkjennaldA.Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammographywithsoft-copyreading in population-basedscreeningprogram: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology. 2007;244(3):708-717 7)Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammographyforbreast-cancerscreening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1773-83. 8)Rebecca Smith-Bindman , Philip Chu , Diana L. Miglioretti , Chris Quale , Robert D. Rosenberg , Gary Cutter , Berta Geller , Peter Bacchetti , Edward A. Sickles , Karla KerlikowskePhysicianpredictors of mammographicaccuracy. J NatlCancerInst. 2005;97(5):358-67. 9) Smith-Bindman R, Ballard-Barbash R, Miglioretti DL, Patnick J, KerlikowskeK. Comparingthe performance of mammographyscreeninginthe USA and the UK. J MedScreen. 2005;12:50-4. 10) Castells X, Molins E, Macià F. Cumulative false positive recallrateandassociationwithparticipantrelatedfactors in a populationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme. J EpidemiolCommunityHealth. 2006; 60:316-21.

  2. Bibliografía 11)Sala M, Comas M, Macià F, Martinez J, Casamitjana M, Castells X. Implementation of digital mammography in apopulation-based breast cancer screeningprogram: effect of screening round on recall rateand cancer detection .Radiology. 2009 252(1):31-9. 12)Michael J. Schell, PhDBonnie C. Yankaskas, PhDRachel Ballard-Barbash, MD, MPHBahjat F. Qaqish, PhD,MDWilliam E. Barlow, PhDRobert D. Rosenberg,MDRebecca Smith-Bindman,MD. Evidence-based Target Recall Rates for Screening Mammography. Radiology. 2007 243(3):681-689. 13)Programa de detección precoz del cáncer de mama de Tarragona –Terre de l´Ebre. Marzo 2009. Nº 16 14) Laia Domingo • Maria Sala • Sonia Servitja • Josep Maria Corominas •Francisco Ferrer • Juan Martínez • Francesc Macia Maria Jesu s Quintana • Joan Albanell • Xavier Castells. Phenotypic characterization and risk factors for interval breast cancers in a population-based breast cancer screening program in Barcelona, Spain. Cancer Causes Contro lDOI 10.1007/s10552-010-9541-6 15)Chevalier, M, Moran P, Ten J.I. Fernández Soto M, Cepeda T Vañó E. Patien dose in digital mammography. Med Phys 31(9) 2471-8. 16)Pisano ED, Gatsonis CA, Yaffe MJ, Hendrick RE, Tosteson AN, Fryback DG, Bassett LW, Baum JK, Conant EF, Jong RA, Rebner M, D'Orsi CJ. AmericanCollege of Radiology Imaging Network DigitalMammographic Imaging Screening Trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology 2005; 236: 404–412 17) Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Averbukh A, Moran C, Berns EA, Yaffe MJ, Herman B, Acharyya S, Gatsonis C. Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trialAJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(2):362-9 18) Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, McGee MA, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom.National Breast Screening Program. Radiology 2006;241:47-53. 19). Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Maureen GC et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Eng J Med 2008; 359,16 :1675-1684

More Related