1 / 13

BR( f  h g ) with p + p - 7 g

20/02/2004. BR( f  h g ) with p + p - 7 g. Camilla Di Donato INFN Napoli. BR( f  h g ) measurement. BR( f  h  g ) measured on 2000 data p + p - 3 g : Phys. Lett. B541 (2002) p + p - 7 g : km 268 and analysis update with referee suggestions

Download Presentation

BR( f  h g ) with p + p - 7 g

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 20/02/2004 BR(fhg) with p+p- 7g Camilla Di Donato INFN Napoli

  2. BR(fhg) measurement BR(fhg) measured on 2000 data • p+p-3g : Phys. Lett. B541 (2002) • p+p-7g : km 268 and analysis update with referee suggestions • crg h hp+p-andh p0p0p0 • ntr h hp0p0andh p+p-p0 BR(fhg) and P evaluation on 2001- 2002 data; Lint =449 pb-1 Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  3. BR(fhg) measurement Update the old analysis • Analysed 449pb-1 from 2001-2002 data collection • time window = min(5st,2ns) • EMC-MC threshold • accidentals in DC • input kin.fit: pull • cut on cosqpp<-0.9 and on Ep+p-removed • Analysis of background cosqpp 1 with didone • Systematic error evaluation completed (excluding VTX) Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  4. Barrel Ecap West Barrel Ecap West Ecap East Ecap East Trigger-FILFO-EVCL We check Trigger FILFO and Event Classification • Trigger: eMC(crg) = 99.7%; eMC(ntr) = 99.9% On events selected by the analysis we found eMC =100% Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  5. Trigger-FILFO-EVCL • FILFO-EVCL on triggered events: eMC(crg) = 57.88%; eMC(ntr) = 61.45% We check the efficiency mc value performing the analysis on unbiased sample (1/5 of 2002 data) in order to evaluate a systematics. We find (eMC – edata)/ eMC =2% Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  6. Topological selection • eMC(crg) = (19.61±0.05)%; eMC(ntr) = (20.56±0.08)% Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  7. 2001- 2002: Lint =449 pb-1 Nob.ev. = 3863±62 From MC study we estimated the expected background: Ks p+ p- ; Kl p0 p0 p0 Nbg1 = 64 Ks p0p0 ; Kl p+ p- p0 Nbg2 = 168 Ks p+ p- g; Kl p0 p0 p0 Nbg1 = 141 Nh’g= Nob.ev. - Nbg Nh’g = 3490±62 Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  8. Ks p+ p- Kl p0 p0 p0 Ks p+ p- g Kl p0 p0 p0 Signal Ks p0 p0 Kl p+ p- p0 Nob.ev. = 3863±62 Ep++Ep+ (MeV) c2/Ndf Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  9. Ks p+ p- Kl p0 p0 p0 Ks p+ p- g Kl p0 p0 p0 Signal Ks p0 p0 Kl p+ p- p0 Mh is obtain from the “best” 3 grad Right grad 80% Egrad(MeV) Mh(MeV) Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  10. 4% (due to BR” from PDG’02) • D(N/e)/(N/e) 1.5% • Filfo-Evcl 2% Results • Nh’g = 3490±62 • Nf = Lint•s(e+e-f)  4% • Lint= 449 pb-1 1% • s(e+e-f)=(3.340.01 0.12)mb (Kn177 Simona and Stefano) Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  11. Results • BR(fhg) = (6.04±0.10±0.36)•10-5 p+p-3g : Phys. Lett. B541 (2002) BR(fhg) = (6.10±0.61±0.43)•10-5 • R= BR(fhg)/BRPDG02(fhg)  P (Bramon) • Mixing angle evaluation Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  12. Conclusions and Outlooks • We look at the full KLOE statistic; • BR(fhg) measurement almost completed: to be check vtx effect on systematics; • Pseudoscalar mixing angle evaluated; • A Kloe Memo is in preparation (I need to discuss with Simona and Paolo, my referee) Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

  13. Unbiased sample ……… ……………for Filfo-Evcl study • 2002: done 29 pb-1 run 27000-27137 11 pb-1 (all runs) run 23557-25967 18 pb-1 (one run each ten) • 2001: to be done run 17868-23010 datarec V13  11 pb-1 run 18345-23129 datarec V14  8 pb-1 Camilla - Rad. Meeting 20-02-04

More Related