1 / 10

NPCA Board Resolution

NPCA Board Resolution. September 2006 – PPSI Meeting. State and Local governments requested a decision from NPCA at its March 2007 Board meeting Will the industry help finance a national post consumer paint management system?. NPCA Board Resolution.

samuru
Download Presentation

NPCA Board Resolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NPCA Board Resolution

  2. September 2006 – PPSI Meeting • State and Local governments requested a decision from NPCA at its March 2007 Board meeting • Will the industry help finance a national post consumer paint management system?

  3. NPCA Board Resolution • As per the government request – on March 21, 2007 – NPCA Board approved the “resolution” • However, NPCA was able to reach consensus by acknowledging there are “important considerations that must be addressed in a definitive way…” • These concerns can be summarized under the headings of • Funding • Roles of industry/government • Role of recycling.

  4. Important Considerations • Consumer education must be a cornerstone of the system, to reduce the volume of leftover paint and the cost of its management • Collecting or recycling latex paint in rural areas is not cost-effective • Collecting or recycling latex paint in cans less than one-third full is also not cost-effective • Oil-based paint should be collected for disposal (due to its ignitability)

  5. Important Considerations (cont.) • No mandatory “take back” at retail locations – although retailers and manufacturers may take back product voluntarily • Industry expects to partner with government to share the cost and responsibility of managing post-consumer paint • Where available, existing government collection infrastructure should be utilized • Where non-existent, industry may need to subsidize a new collection system (e.g., such as the “Product Care” system in British Columbia)

  6. Important Considerations (cont.) • Paint collection and management must be as cost-effective as possible • Costs should be fair, transparent to the consumer, and collected at retail • An industry-run organization is needed to collect and allocate funds with full accountability

  7. Pilot • A pilot project is needed to work out details of system, including: • Project funding • Scope dependent • Retailer activities • Industry/Government Roles • Build on current collection • Disposal options • Role of Recycling • Existing facilities • Viability of expansion

  8. MOU Seek NPCA Board approval July 2007 Goals/Objectives: • Continue PPSI dialogue • Pursue the development of a nationally coordinated system • Undertake a pilot project to work through critical issues and gather information

  9. Work Agreements for Pilot Project: Timeframe – 24 months (6 months to plan/develop, 12 months to execute, and six months to review results/ramp up for national promotion) Location Defined roles/responsibilities Program funding Role of recycling Goals/measurements MOU

  10. MOU Limitations: • Voluntary • NPCA to sign on behalf of industry Appendix: • Pilot Project details

More Related