1 / 27

Frederick Groger-Roth,

Kogukondlike ühenduste võimestamine mõjusa ja strateegilise ennetuse läbiviimiseks: hooliva kogukonna mudeli väljavaated ja käsitlus Euroopas. Frederick Groger-Roth, Alam-Saksi liidumaa kuritegevuse ennetuse nõukogu/ Alam-Saksi liidumaa Justiitsministeerium.

sandersmartha
Download Presentation

Frederick Groger-Roth,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kogukondlike ühenduste võimestamine mõjusa ja strateegilise ennetuse läbiviimiseks: hooliva kogukonna mudeli väljavaated ja käsitlus Euroopas Frederick Groger-Roth, Alam-Saksi liidumaa kuritegevuse ennetuse nõukogu/ Alam-Saksi liidumaa Justiitsministeerium

  2. Empowering community coalitions for effective prevention planning: prospects of the “Communities That Care – CTC” approach in Europe „Turvaliste kogukondade Eesti“ Conference on community safety, crime prevention and networking 24th of May 2016 in Tallinn, Estonia Frederick Groeger-Roth Crime Prevention Council of Lower Saxony / Ministry of Justice of Lower Saxony, Germany frederick.groeger-roth@mj.niedersachsen.de

  3. AGENDA 1. 2. 3.

  4. Whyusing a communityplanningsystem? • seldomcomprehensivepreventionstrategies on locallevel, moreoftenlooseconnectedsingleapproaches • needforinfrastructurandsupportsystemsformainstreamingofpreventionmeasures • incidentalchoiceofprovenpreventionprogrammes, rarelycoherentstrategiesforscaling-upeffectiveprogrammes • localpartnershipsandcommunity-basednetworksare essential, but theyneedsystematicalsupportforeffectiveworkingmethods

  5. Communities That Care: • is a testedcommunityplanningsystem • toprevent multiple problembehaviours in youth (violence, delinquency, substanceabuse, schoolfailureanddepression / anxiety) • bytacklingcommonunderlyingriskandprotectivefactors • throughcommunitycoalitionsandevidence-basedprogrammes(Hawkins, Catalano et al. 1992, Hawkins et al. 2002) • implementationmodel: • providinginstruments, trainingandtechnicalassistanceforcommunity • preventioncoalitionstoadopt a preventionscienceapproach

  6. CTC – implementationstrategy: • mobilizingcommunitystakeholdersandempoweringcommunitycoalitionsforstrategicpreventionplanning (Phase 1 and 2) • needandressourceassesment: measuringprofilesofriskandprotection at communitylevel (CTC - Youth Survey), focus on the • mostpressing r/p factorsandassessmentofexistingressourcesandservices (Phase 3) • matchingofeffectivepreventionprogrammestocommunityneeds, developingmeasurablegoals, communityaction plan (Phase 4) • monitoringandevaluationofresultsofprogrammeimplementation, adjustmentofaction plan (Phase 5)

  7. Key Leader and Community Board Training Science-based Prevention Planning on Community Level Action Plan Implementation Training Risk Analysis Training Umsetzung in der Kommune Community Action Plan Training Ressource Analysis Training

  8. Risk and Protective Factors Riskfactors like „family conflict“ are predictive for later problem behaviours Protective Factors like „family bonding“ are buffering the impact of risk fators and are predictive for less problem behaviours

  9. Social Development Strategy: Enhancing common protective factors in all socialising units (Hawkins / Catalano1996)

  10. Communities are facing different profiles of risk and protection:

  11. Example of CTC Youth Survey results, family risk domain:

  12. Menu of Proven Effective Programmes

  13. 14

  14. 15 16

  15. AGENDA 1. 2. 3.

  16. Community Crime Prevention in Germany • Core elementsoflocalcrimepreventionbodies (in theory): • facingthelocalconditions • multi-agencyorientation, broadnetworking • involvementofactivecitizens • But… • lack of strategic partnerships among different agencies - mainly project-oriented networking • mostly “model / pilot-project” efforts - difficulties in mainstreaming of successful approaches in social services delivery • lack of evidence-base for many local activities • despite of an increasing number of proven prevention programmes: no large-scale dissemination

  17. Lower Saxony: • State Capital: Hannover • Size: 47,624.22 km² • Population: 7,973,800 State of Lower Saxony

  18. ~ 200 Local Crime Prevention Bodies in Lower Saxony

  19. Current CTC Status in Germany • pilot project in 3 communities (2009 – 2012): CTC – process was feasible (process evaluation: Schubert et al. 2013) • CTC – Youth Survey: adapted and state-wide use in Lower Saxony 2013 + 2015 ff. • online - database of effective and promising prevention programmes was developed (“Green List Prevention”, www.gruene-liste-praevention.de) • new CTC – sites in urban and rural settings in Lower Saxony since 2013 • second evaluation study shows promising results (Jonkman 2015) • transfer to other states (Saxony) and cities (Augsburg) in Germany

  20. AGENDA 1. 2. 3.

  21. Main issuesfortransferofCTC in the European context • generalizabilityoftheunderlyingr / p factor- model • numberandqualityofpreventionprogrammeevaluations, availabilityofmenusanddatabasesabouteffectiveprogrammes • legal, politicalandstructuraldifferences, e.g. preventionserviceplanninganddelivery

  22. Addressing this issues: EU-funded project „Making CTC work at the European level“ (2013 – 2015): Partners from Austria, Croatia, Cyprus, Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden and United Kingdom 1) cross-national comparison of CTC – Survey results 2) building up a European databank of effective and promising prevention programmes 3) comparison of CTC evaluation results - developing a European CTC implementation guide

  23. Project Partners: Austria: Institute for the Prevention of Addiction and Drug Abuse Croatia: University of Zagreb Cyprus: University of Cyprus Germany: Crime Prevention Council of Lower Saxony The Netherlands: Verwey-Jonker Institute, Seinpost Adviesbureau, University of Leiden Sweden: City of Malmö UK: Dartington Social Research Unit Chair of the Advisory Board: David Farrington, UK Funding: With the financial support of the Prevention of and Fight Against Crime Programme, European Commission - Directorate-General Home Affairs

  24. Working Structure and Results

  25. Thank you very much for your attention! www.ctc-network.eu

More Related