150 likes | 272 Views
September 25th 2006. The WFD and its economic elements. Arnaud Courtecuisse – Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie. 1. WFD & Economic Analysis. 1. WFD & Economic Analysis. River Basin Management Plan Derogation (disproportionate cost) Heavily modified water bodies. Programme of Measures
E N D
September 25th 2006 The WFD and its economic elements Arnaud Courtecuisse – Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie
1. WFD & Economic Analysis • River Basin Management Plan • Derogation (disproportionate cost) • Heavily modified water bodies
Programme of Measures • cost-effectiveness analysis in order to select the most cost-effective set of measures
Economic analysis : To do what ? to identify and analyse the context to set « realistic » objective to set priorities (identify the most cost-effective measures) to help to achieve the environmental objectives • Tools to support decision making process • tools for action
2015 2004 Risk ++++++ ++++++ Risk derogation Characterisation River Basin Management Plan Programme of measures Objectives ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
What are the main water uses? Which economic figures ? • identify the main activities using water • Provide figures on abstraction, discharges, turnover, employement,…. The characterisation of the District (art. 5 DCE ; art. 3 décret 2005-475)
2. The context of the Artois-Picardie Basin Rivers quality assessment • 20 000 Km2 • 4,7 Millions inhabitants • GDP: 98 billions € • GPD/inhabitant: 21 107 € • GPD/inh France: 25 978 € • Unemployment rate: 12,7% • France: 9,9 % • 96% of drinkable water come from groundwater
Basin Artois-Picardie – Added value Breakdown per main industrial activities
Baseline scenario 2015 • Objectives : • Provide trends for the main water uses • Assess the pressures level for 2015 • Risk assessment of water bodies which may not achieve good status in 2015
Approach adpoted for the development of the baseline scenario April 2003 June 2003 December 2003 2015 Forecast System building Phase 1: System Characterisation Phase 2: Trends analysis Phase 3: Scenarios building Phase 4: Impact assessment Phase 5: Identification of water bodies with risk Contacts experts Local stakeholders meeting Contacts experts Local Stakeholders meeting • Past analysis of the key elements evolution and 2015 forecats • Exepected evolution analysis • Planning documents analysis • Baseline scenario buiding • Two alternative scenario building (optmistic/pessimistic) • Pressures and impacts analysis • Revision of the results by experts • Documentation analysis • Existing surveys analysis • Definition of the basin’s system • Identification of key elements • Risk assessment for each water body • Final documents redaction
Trends for Organic Matter 2015 2000
Take into account Upstream/downstream effect Masse d’eau Aval M2 Masse d’eau Amont M1 P2: Pressions générées Sur la masse d’eau pression transférée en aval : P’2 = (1-C1)x P1 P1: Pressions générées Sur la masse d’eau P’2: Pressions transférées de la masse d’eau M1 C2: Auto-épuration C1: Auto-épuration C2x (P2+ P’2) : pression auto-épurée C1x P1: pression auto-épurée